We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Government fails to act on Lifetime ISA fines

13»

Comments

  • The 450k cap applies to the total value of the property even if you are using a part buy part rent scheme. This means that in London and the SE struggling first timers who need to use such a scheme to get going at all are penalised if e.g. they buy a 25% share for 125k as that means a nominal 500k which is over the cap. 450k is not a generous amount however you look at it.
  • Kim_13
    Kim_13 Posts: 3,906 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If they even made it so that £450K could be the share of the home you were buying, it would help. If you have to use a shared ownership scheme (with the ongoing rent and potential uncertainty around that) then you are not undeserving of help. Obviously there would have to be other caveats, like you can't buy a share of a house for more than it is worth, and couples shouldn't be able to use LISAs and buy a house for £900K.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.