3 parking Parking Fines - Railway Car Park + ANPR [auto-renew subscription failure]

Coupon-mad

Yep. You have summed it up

And we know (can prove from those Askews moneyclaims) that SABA have retained statute barred data then used it later for another purpose than it was supplied for (byelaws penalty only. 6 months limitation period, Magistrates Court only).

They tried to use small claims over some saved batches of these PNs years after they had expired (statute barred), so this scam quite simply isn't safe to sit outside of government regulation.

Your case is important!

Please show your evidence in your response to the Public Consultation, especially when answering the question about POPLA and the IAS. Tell the MHCLG and show them your 'Penalty Notice' and the SABA rejection letter only offering an unknown (is it BPA? Is it independent?) 'third appeals service' (whose website has a BPA member logo) and ask if they knew about it.

Given that the PN and/or SABA rejection letter and/or the sign very likely(?) carry the BPA AOS roundel logo, I'd argue this is misleading and looks like these ones will fall between the cracks in the MHCLG new Code unless they address railway byelaws PNs specifically.

You can't have signs and letters proclaiming an operator is in the BPA AOS yet not offering the Single Appeals service that the government intends to cover ALL private managed land.