📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Skipton B.Soc Privacy policy email

124»

Comments

  • gt94sss2
    gt94sss2 Posts: 6,536
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    Has anyone approached the ICO and asked them if Skipton's actions comply with their legal requirements?
  • x44
    x44 Posts: 188
    100 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Yes, I finally got round to complaining to the ICO a while back
    Like with the Financial Ombudsman I'm not expecting a quick reply.
  • butterflymum
    butterflymum Posts: 1,049
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite

    Well done on your attempts to have this corrected. I, too, feel more companies need to comply with standards, of whichever nature and from whichever body, and think it is important to point out when they fall short (even, as often seems the case nowadays, it goes unchanged), and alert the respective body. If we all did nothing, then nothing might ever change.

    butterfly )i(
  • bubieyehyeh
    bubieyehyeh Posts: 635
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite

    Could not remember if I had already opted out, so tried and the website broken, so I've sent them a secure message.

  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 11,935
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite

    I've also found that if you change the problem site address to another alias which includes their organisation and something offensive they will then no longer attempt to sell this email address to other third parties because of the embarrassment factor - effectively poisoning the well.

    Many of the banks and building societies have updated their general T&Cs in recent years to explicitly cover the use of offensive language in things like payment references. Even if the offensive email address you give them is not explicitly covered by the T&C's, they can still use their general "we don't want to do business with you" reason for closing your accounts if a member of staff or an automated checker spots your address and considers it offensive.

    A complaint to FOS is unlikely to get a very sympathetic assessment, and there's an outside chance the bank will claim your use of their name in your email address is an attempt at impersonation as well.

    It is also probably quite likely that a database dump of customer email addresses won't be checked for offensiveness before being handed over to the third-party - so as a strategy I doubt it would be very effective, given the risk of account closure involved.

  • dcs34
    dcs34 Posts: 936
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 28 September at 12:04PM

    Just to provide an update on this, I have finally had a response from Skipton. I had (separately) complained about an error in interest payments for a closed account, which they have upheld and I will accept the proposed compensation (to also cover my time dealing with the privacy points).

    Regarding the privacy policy complaint (as per the above), their response is as follows: (bold for emphasis + [square bracket edits] added by me)

    I understand you are unhappy about our privacy policy, in particular the clause regarding us sharing your data with social media companies and that you were not notified of this change. To investigate I contacted our marketing and complaince teams to establish whether your data was shared, and the process and policy behind this sharing.

    To clarify first and foremost, your data was not shared with any social media partners.

    In July 2025 when the decision was made to begin the sharing, we chose to only include those who had consented to email marketing. As you had not consented to email marketing, you were not included within the sharing. This is also why you weren't aware of the policy change, because we only contacted those who were affected by the change.

    To be transparent, due to customer feedback, amongst other considerations, the Society has taken the decision to cease all sharing with social media partners for the foreseeable. We appreciate your further feedback as well.

    However, [the] clause is not being removed from our privacy policy as the sharing may be considered again in the future. If you would like to opt-out and ensure your data will never be shared, I suggest following the link within the privacy policy to do so. To clarify, if your data was being shared, and you opted out, any data held by our social media partners would be deleted at the end of the roling month and then never shared again.

    Overall, your data was not shared with our social media partners because you didn't meet the eligibility critiria, and this is also why you were not contacted about the policy changes. Therefore, you have not been negatively affected by the processing and I cannot uphold your complaint.

    To summarise:

    • Skipton say the sharing only took place between July 2025 until an unknown date before 17th September (I would wager the ICO involvement from previous replies on this thread may offer a clue!), and is currently no longer ongoing.
    • Only those who consented to email marketing were included in the batch of data that was shared (note they have not committed to apply this restriction in any future data-sharing).
    • If you want to opt-out and "ensure your data will never be shared", then you need to follow this link: https://www.skipton.co.uk/privacy-policy/opt-out-data-sharing

    I don't feel they even considered the fourth bullet point of my complaint, regarding their use of an 'opted-in by default' approach. My understanding of GDPR is that such extraneous use of customers' data should be undertaken following explicit (not implicit) authorisation, which can only be given by a manual 'opt-in' approach. But given they're offering compensation for the other issues I have complied with their request to use the opt-out link, and will agree to close the complaint (since if they say I was not affected, and the ICO are unlikely to make them pay out to all customers (at best it'd probably only be those included/affected), then it's not going to achieve anything else at this point).

  • fuzzzzy
    fuzzzzy Posts: 458
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite

    I seem to recall receiving a similar e-mail from VIDA recently about changes to the privacy policy regarding sharing data with social media. I messaged them and they confirmed that if I wanted to avoid this I would need to remove the permission to receive marketing information to my e-mail address from my marketing preferences.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179.1K Life & Family
  • 264K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards
Quick Search

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.