We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
CNBC Claim defence advice needed
Options
Comments
-
Remove 'from Ashby v Tolhurst [1937]' which isn't a relevant case.
And change:
"It is also true that the Defendant was under the impression that the location at which the vehicle was pictured was an unrestricted road and adjacent pavement..."
to
It is also true that there were a lack of signs and lines, therefore the Defendant believed this was an unrestricted public road...
But hang on a minute, isn't this a Gladstones claim? Show us the POC. You should be using the linked para 3 with Chan & Akande, shown in the Template Defence.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards