PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Cost of Management Packs

Options
I am currently in the process of selling my late mother's retirement flat, a leasehold property, and was informed by my solicitor that I was required to obtain a Management Pack (MP) prior to the exchange of contracts. We only purchased the property 24 months ago and this wasn't a requirement at that time.

The property was, until recently managed, by Churchill Management and I requested the MP from them to be told that it was £395. The money was paid to them only to discover that they had resigned from the management of the property and transferred the management to First Port. The £395 was returned after 20 days sitting on my money!
First Port then quoted £440 for the MP with a 15 working days turnaround. However, this could be expedited by throwing more money at it - up to £660.

Surely these Management Packs need to be regulated?

The seller has to purchase them - but of no value to the seller - the contents are not that complex, they are only valid for 6 months and the management company can charge whatever price they can get away with.

Seems very unfair and needs more control. Who can address this problem? 

Comments

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 17,984 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    It's been addressed in the Leasehold and Freehold reform act 2024. 

    The Act allows for a cap to be put on the cost of management packs (£200+vat has been mentioned) and a time limit for producing them.

    But unfortunately, the act hasn't come into force yet. And some parts of the Act (not relating to management packs) are being challenged in court, so it's probably uncertain when this stuff will come into force.
     


    We only purchased the property 24 months ago and this wasn't a requirement at that time.


    Your solicitor would have almost certainly required the relevant information from Churchill Management.

    If you bought directly from Churchill, they probably supplied the information directly to your solicitor.

    If you bought 'second hand', the seller would have almost certainly paid for a management pack from Churchill.


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.