We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Santander free forever bank account changes
Options
Comments
-
Section62 said:Lightning360 said:Emmia said:singhini said:Out of curiosity, why don't Santander just notify their customers they intend to close all these types of accounts (similar to what TESCO did with their current accounts back in November 2021)?
Are Santander not allowed to do it?
Answer, yes they can. Either via notice or by declining to continue serving those businesses by closing the accounts.4 -
singhini said:
I thought the MSE moto was "ditch and switch"?
I'm assuming these people are aware other banks offer free business banking: such as Virgin Money, Monzo and Tide (looks like Tide are doing £100 and £200 cash back at the momentAre any of those other banks offering a promise of free business banking "forever"? If not, then how are they better?The MSE 'ditch and switch' would come with the caveat of not switching if the product you currently have has some advantage over anything new you could get - the premise is to move to a product which is better/cheaper, not a product which is worse/more expensive.Someone with grandfathered "free forever" rights would be ill-advised to 'ditch and switch' to a product with less advantageous terms.singhini said:Hey ho, never mind
Personally i'm gutted these people are complaining (im a Santander Shareholder............. Ive got "double digit" shares.............. Yes that's right "DOUBLE-DIGITAs a Santander shareholder myself, my main concern is about reputational harm. A bank which wants to grow in the UK by taking over another bank, and one which has recently had a very public whinge about regulation, needs to tread lightly when it comes to making changes to customer accounts which have previously proved controversial. The numbers are no doubt fewer than in 2012, but if the issue is taken up by someone effective at making a noise about bank's behaviour then the actual numbers don't really matter that much. One is enough, if enough noise is made.I'm not going to predict the outcome, but I'd suggest the idea that banks can do what they want without consequences is somewhat outdated. And poor business decisions are potentially more of a threat to shareholder value than continuing to absorb the cost of giving free business banking to a diminishing number of customers.1 -
Emmia said:Section62 said:Lightning360 said:Emmia said:singhini said:Out of curiosity, why don't Santander just notify their customers they intend to close all these types of accounts (similar to what TESCO did with their current accounts back in November 2021)?
Are Santander not allowed to do it?
Answer, yes they can. Either via notice or by declining to continue serving those businesses by closing the accounts.0 -
Emmia said:Section62 said:Lightning360 said:Emmia said:singhini said:Out of curiosity, why don't Santander just notify their customers they intend to close all these types of accounts (similar to what TESCO did with their current accounts back in November 2021)?
Are Santander not allowed to do it?
Answer, yes they can. Either via notice or by declining to continue serving those businesses by closing the accounts.Well that one has been answered by both you and Hoenir already, so I don't understand Lightning360's point, or amusement?Those complaining don't need to answer that question.0 -
Section62 said:Emmia said:Section62 said:Lightning360 said:Emmia said:singhini said:Out of curiosity, why don't Santander just notify their customers they intend to close all these types of accounts (similar to what TESCO did with their current accounts back in November 2021)?
Are Santander not allowed to do it?
Answer, yes they can. Either via notice or by declining to continue serving those businesses by closing the accounts.Well that one has been answered by both you and Hoenir already, so I don't understand Lightning360's point, or amusement?Those complaining don't need to answer that question.1 -
The Santander argument that they are no longer offering the product in an effort to impose charges is a falsity. Santander made the promise that customers would have free business banking forever and need to honour that promise. Trying to pull the wool over and claim the customers are no longer entitled to free banking by changing the account type will not work. Remember they changed the account type also in 2012 also but had to backtrack and remove the fees when the backlash from customers began. A promise is a promise and it should be honoured in full.0
-
noitsnotme said:Looks like they've made a judgement call and calculated that the amount they will have to pay out in respect of FOS complaints offset against how much they will save by closing the free banking accounts, is worth taking the risk of proceeding.
As mentioned above, I don't know why people are wasting energy over this when there are other (better?) free banking options out there.
And whilst I agree, whats the point in fighting for it, when you can simply move to another bank that offers free banking and actually wants you as a customer, I think you need to remember there is the hassle in moving everything to another bank, which will inevitably have teething problems, and also whats to stop that bank withdrawing the free service at anytime?0 -
Section62 said:singhini said:
I thought the MSE moto was "ditch and switch"?
I'm assuming these people are aware other banks offer free business banking: such as Virgin Money, Monzo and Tide (looks like Tide are doing £100 and £200 cash back at the momentAre any of those other banks offering a promise of free business banking "forever"? If not, then how are they better?The MSE 'ditch and switch' would come with the caveat of not switching if the product you currently have has some advantage over anything new you could get - the premise is to move to a product which is better/cheaper, not a product which is worse/more expensive.Someone with grandfathered "free forever" rights would be ill-advised to 'ditch and switch' to a product with less advantageous terms.singhini said:Hey ho, never mind
Personally i'm gutted these people are complaining (im a Santander Shareholder............. Ive got "double digit" shares.............. Yes that's right "DOUBLE-DIGITAs a Santander shareholder myself, my main concern is about reputational harm. A bank which wants to grow in the UK by taking over another bank, and one which has recently had a very public whinge about regulation, needs to tread lightly when it comes to making changes to customer accounts which have previously proved controversial. The numbers are no doubt fewer than in 2012, but if the issue is taken up by someone effective at making a noise about bank's behaviour then the actual numbers don't really matter that much. One is enough, if enough noise is made.I'm not going to predict the outcome, but I'd suggest the idea that banks can do what they want without consequences is somewhat outdated. And poor business decisions are potentially more of a threat to shareholder value than continuing to absorb the cost of giving free business banking to a diminishing number of customers.
Reputation -----> their a bank (they face criticism routinely).
I whinge about regulation, i still don't understand why banks are forced to provide a basic bank account for free.
I agree with "poor business decisions are potentially more of a threat to shareholder value" -----> very poor decision to offer these accounts in the first place IMHO1 -
Good luck to you all
You should fight your corner if you feel unjustly treated.
0 -
It depends on the business but changing the main bank account can be a proper pain and can cause problems for months. Most of my customers paid me by bank transfer and that usually meant they just select you on their system and enter the payment details. I changed the invoice to the new bank details, I included a covering letter with those invoices and I wrote to each customer separately to change the details on their system and I still had payments going missing for weeks and months because they were sent to the closed account. The bigger the customer, the harder it seemed yo be to update the account details!
In retrospect it would have been cheaper and less stressful to bite the bullet and run the old account and new account in parallel for five or six months, even though I would have been paying the fees.
Interestingly that 2012 Beeb article says:
"We guarantee that unless there are any changes to the law or banking regulations, or any new taxes relating to bank charges, you will benefit from free day-to-day business banking forever," one brochure seen by the BBC said.
However you look at it, the bank was proper daft for putting that in writing.
4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards