PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Cleaning after plastering/decorating - who should be paying?

Options
Hi all,

My very first post, so hoping it goes well!

My partner, her daughter and I have been living in our current rented home since last September through OpenRent.

We've had a really good relationship with our landlord thus far and he's dealt with any issues promptly and without issue, but now we're heading for our first dispute and I was hoping for some advice.

Over the winter we noticed some damp in the corner of the house and the landlord decided to get the walls damp proofed. Whilst it would inconvenience us and make around a third of the house unusable for the duration, we didn't oppose this and accepted £100 a week off the rent for the inconvenience of losing access to the main two rooms we live our lives in for a few weeks.

The issue that has emerged is who is going to pay for cleaning the place once the work is done. The landlord originally agreed to pay for this, but after we sought quotes, all of which have been in the £200-300 range, he's now saying he only think it needs a hoover and a mop, despite the professionals all saying it's going to be a big job getting all the dust and mess gone, and is only willing to contribute the £40 he thinks it should cost and that we should pay the rest as he's already given us money for the inconvenience.

So, where do we stand? In my view, if we returned the house to him in its current state, he would charge us heavily for the cost of cleaning, so it's his responsibility to get it up to the standard it was in when we moved in as he initiated these works, but it would be nice to have something we can throw at him from a legal sense.
«1

Comments

  • Emmia
    Emmia Posts: 5,521 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 July at 7:20AM
    How keen are you not to move again?

    Edit: Throwing things at your landlord in a legal sense is likely to get you your S.21 sooner rather than later, and they may drag their feet a bit on doing other fixes...
  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,633 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Really, the workmen should have left it in a reasonable clean state.  However it costs you nothing but some time and effort to do the cleaning so would be best to do it rather than get into dispute when the Landlord has already been reasonable on rent etc.  A bit of give and take.
  • Myci85
    Myci85 Posts: 393 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Just how bad have the workmen left it? Obviously the professional cleaners are going to tell you it's a big job, they're justifying their quotes being higher than you'd expect. 
    When we had a new kitchen put in our rented house, the workmen hoovered up the worst of the mess, but we then did the rest, and as the room as empty for them to install, it wasn't too time consuming. 
    There's a lot to be said for a landlord who you have a good relationship with and who gets work done when needed. A lot don't. So it might be worth saving the relationship if you plan to live there for a while. 
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 22,241 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    Some landlords would have ignored the damp.

    H e got it dealt with, gave you £100 a week for the inconvenience. Take the £40 and get your hoover and mop out or engage a local cleaning lady to clean it.
     Why does it need a professional company when the rooms had been lived in up until then?

    Did you employ a professional company to clean your house or did you do it yourself?
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,126 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 July at 8:52AM
    I’m not sure what a cleaning firm charges per hour in your area, but round here it’s £50 per hour for one off jobs. So, your £200 quote equates to maybe 4 hours work. Your landlord is offering you £10 per hour, tax free. You can watch Netflix while doing the work. 

    This is really an argument not worth having. That’s even if you don’t like the property, and intend to move out soon. If you want to stay, then it would be bananas to sour the relationship with your landlord over something so small.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Tabieth
    Tabieth Posts: 257 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I agree with the consensus. The landlord sounds like a good one and I don’t think this is worth making a fuss over. He quickly fixed the damp problem and gave a rent reduction whilst works happened. I certainly wouldn’t be throwing anything thin from a legal sense!

    (And the trades should leave the place in a reasonable state afterwards. It will probably need a clean but they should be cleaning the worst of their mess up themselves.) 
  • RHemmings
    RHemmings Posts: 4,876 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Just make sure that you keep evidence such as emails where he refuses to do the cleaning or pay a reasonable amount for it. That way if there is a deposit dispute later on, you can provide the deposit scheme with the evidence. 
  • the_lunatic_is_in_my_head
    the_lunatic_is_in_my_head Posts: 9,196 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 July at 9:59AM
    Advise landlord to find the source of damp rather than paying thousands for unnecessary work and then you won't have to clean, with all the money saved he might even keep that £100 off the rent offer. 

    Proposed work won't solve the problem, only hide it (which doesn't really affect you as it's not your property) but if the source of damp is cured then there won't be any tidying up from all the unnecessary plastering.
    In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces
  • saajan_12
    saajan_12 Posts: 4,975 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why would he be paying you to find someone? If he undertakes to do work, then that includes getting the property back into a reasonably clean and livable position. There is no specific regulation saying exactly who's cleanliness standard it has to meet. If he gets the tradespeople to do it or employs a cleaner himself then there's no question of the amount and him cheaping out or you padding the estimate. 

    Re the numbers, £200 does sound over egged if its just two rooms which are largely empty, even if there's construction dust. Can't imagine more than £20ph x 2-3 hours. I would recommend letting him sort it, but if you really want to control it, then I'd either take the £40 or negotiate it up to £60 and move on. 
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 22,241 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    Advise landlord to find the source of damp rather than paying thousands for unnecessary work and then you won't have to clean, with all the money saved he might even keep that £100 off the rent offer. 

    Proposed work won't solve the problem, only hide it (which doesn't really affect you as it's not your property) but if the source of damp is cured then there won't be any tidying up from all the unnecessary plastering.
    In my view, if we returned the house to him in its current state, he would charge us heavily for the cost of cleaning

    Sounds like the work has been done.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.