We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Charging order
Comments
-
I shall keep you updated as it develops3
-
So finally after so long an answer and a solution
i contacted the treasury solicitor as mentioned previously, and they instructed a law firm to deal with the matter, i had to pay £600 to this law firm based in London and they instructed me to get the original interim restriction order from the land registry of which i managed to do for a small sum. I then forwarded it to the solicitor from the law firm who then looked at it and then told me to forward the outstanding monies owed to dorma therm international to themselves and they would then instruct the LR to remove the restriction.
After so long i cant believe it i thought i would never have a solution, thanks to all for your valuable input2 -
Thanks for taking the time to come back, I think this is very helpful for other people who may end up in the same situation.
I think the outcome at least solves your problem but isn't ideal as if I understand correctly you'd paid the amount already buy had to pay the full amount again. Did they take interest?
And it shouldn't require a solicitor, there's a form which can be filled in and the Treasury Solicitor should be able to do a letter to the LR off the back of that.0 -
Unfortunately due to the time and not being able to prove it’s paid as the business has gone ceased trading and no one or any records of their business can be found I had to pay again , but only the orginal
sum without interest1 -
Apologies , once I had paid the money the treasury solicitor who is dealing with my case has applied to the land registry to have the restriction removed as the debt is satisfied ..0
-
Thanks for the update, and glad it resolved your issue. Surprised at the treasury solicitor making you pay again for a debt which has already been paid though, they shouldn’t have done that. If they inherited a debt which has been paid they do have some duty to prove its still valid. And they should have advised that you don't need £600 for a solicitor to have them remove the charging order.0
-
My understanding is that the Treasury Solicitor can only deal with assets of the dissolved company, and if there was no longer a debt by the time the company was dissolved then there's no asset for them to deal with (so court becomes the only remedy).TomThumb2 said:Thanks for the update, and glad it resolved your issue. Surprised at the treasury solicitor making you pay again for a debt which has already been paid though, they shouldn’t have done that. If they inherited a debt which has been paid they do have some duty to prove its still valid. And they should have advised that you don't need £600 for a solicitor to have them remove the charging order.0 -
Yes, would have thought that if the debt was paid there would have been no asset remaining with the dissolved company. No proof of ownership of asset so difficult for Treasury Solicitor to say they're entitled to payment.0
-
The thing is it’s been so many years , over 20 ! I have no proof of receipt and the company has no records and no one to speak to to check it out .. so treasury say the onus is on myself to prove it or otherwise , if it can’t be proven then they want paying , I suppose I’m just glad that there is an outcome after going around in circles for months0
-
Yes, at least it resolves the situation. But I think the Tresury Sol are trying their luck saying that you need to prove payment has been made after 20 years. I would think they have a duty to prove the debt they're claiming is still owed and a charging order on its own isn't enough.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
