We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parkmaven DCB Legal court claim 2025
Comments
-
Could someone check if my 3rd paragraph is ok to use? Thanks!0
-
The defendant cannot use Chan nor Akande as the claim form pleads a breach. Just refute what it states in the POC about the non valid parking reservation and you can provide evidence that it was a valid reservation in the witness statement.3
-
Sorry I think you’re going to have to spoon feed me here. Are you referring to my 3rd paragraph? How can I prove that it was a valid reservation? I have no evidence, it’s just my word against theirsLe_Kirk said:The defendant cannot use Cha nor Akande as the claim form pleads a breach. Just refute what it states in the POC about the non valid parking reservation and you can provide evidence that it was a valid reservation in the witness statement.0 -
Yes, paragraph 3, cut out all the sentences about Chan and Akande, because your claim form specifies the alleged breach and theirs didn't ( basically you cannot use Chan and Akande in your defence )
You dont need evidence or proof at this early defence stage, you might never need it
You are making a statement under a statement of truth oath, your word is accepted, especially at this text only defence stage2 -
Great, thanks!Gr1pr said:Yes, paragraph 3, cut out all the sentences about Chan and Akande, because your claim form specifies the alleged breach and theirs didn't ( basically you cannot use Chan and Akande in your defence )
You dont need evidence or proof at this early defence stage, you might never need it
You are making a statement under a statement of truth oath, your word is accepted, especially at this text only defence stage1 -
Just checking - are you having difficulty seeing our posts?1505grandad said:
You have left the password in the highlighted "Important Note" box.1505grandad said:"Post a properly redacted picture of the claim form, after hiding 4 items below, so hide the following
Name and address
VRM details
Claim form reference number
Password
Take a picture, add it to a reply "
If you can fulfil the above post request it will be immensely helpful.
Can you state who signed the claim form - probably on the back at the top?
Can you state who signed the claim form as above - was it someone with initials S.E. - if so there may well be another para to add to the (NOT your) Defence - help the forum to help you.3 -
Hi sorry, I missed this.1505grandad said:
Just checking - are you having difficulty seeing our posts?1505grandad said:
You have left the password in the highlighted "Important Note" box.1505grandad said:"Post a properly redacted picture of the claim form, after hiding 4 items below, so hide the following
Name and address
VRM details
Claim form reference number
Password
Take a picture, add it to a reply "
If you can fulfil the above post request it will be immensely helpful.
Can you state who signed the claim form - probably on the back at the top?
Can you state who signed the claim form as above - was it someone with initials S.E. - if so there may well be another para to add to the (NOT your) Defence - help the forum to help you.
1 -
David Croot is a qualified solicitor so there's no need to add the Mazur ruling paragraphs.
Message me if you get completely stuck.Always remember to abide by Space Corps Directive 39436175880932/B:
'All nations attending the conference are only allocated one parking space.'
Genuine Independent 247 Advice: 247advice.uk4 -
As it's an (illegal data processing) DOUBLE DIP case, change:
It is neither admitted nor denied that a term was breached,
to
It is denied that a term was breached
And why aren't you counterclaiming?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Thanks!Coupon-mad said:As it's an (illegal data processing) DOUBLE DIP case, change:
It is neither admitted nor denied that a term was breached,
to
It is denied that a term was breached
And why aren't you counterclaiming?How do I counter claim?Also, apologies for a possible silly question, but do I remove the paragraph numbers when I enter my defence?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



