We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Let's enrich the IAS...
Comments
-
I think we are little late for thath2g2 said:
And so we should make appeals to gather enough evidence to demonstrate a systematic failing.ChirpyChicken said:IAS appeal results are like elections in russia0 -
Well, I'm still going to advise that the generic IAS appeal is submitted as in the vast majority of these cases, it ends up as a claim that is either struck out or discontinued, if they follow the advice and at the end of the day, it will have cost the scammer an extra £15 on top of their claim costs and anything else.Of course, if you are the kind of person who is lucky enough to find hens tooth, it will have cost them £25 for an IAS appeal win. If the operator is being mingy and doesn't want to risk further costs, they can simply concede the appeal.
It's a risk free, two minute copy and paste job that inflicts further effort for the operator to ahem to deal with. Why let them off so easily when we already know their MO. Of course Will Hurley will get richer but that is not the aim. That's the IPC AOS members problem to deal with, if they're at all bothered.2 -
It's never too late. Any time IAS reject an appeal for a case which turns out to have no legs in court we use that to pressure the government (whoever it is at the time) / DVLA to justify their use as an approved appeals service.ChirpyChicken said:
I think we are little late for thath2g2 said:
And so we should make appeals to gather enough evidence to demonstrate a systematic failing.ChirpyChicken said:IAS appeal results are like elections in russia1 -
I wish you'd given me that line a day earlier...ChirpyChicken said:IAS appeal results are like elections in russia
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD4 -
The amounts involved might be small, but it will still have some effect on their bottom line, and more appeals mean more manpower required to deal with them.
Also, according to the IAS's latest report, of the 34,383 appeals received (during the period from 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025), 7,888 were conceded by the operator before adjudication. That is very nearly 23% of them! Not quite as good as a coin flip, but I would argue it's a waste for people not to take advantage of those odds. Granted, we don't know what the ratio of decided cases is.
In comparison, according to POPLA's latest report, 23,800 cases were not contested by Operators (out of a total of 98,110). Which is just over 24% of cases, so pretty similar between the two.
64,808 appeals were adjudicated. 13,216 were allowed (approx 13.5% of the total, or 20% of those adjudicated). 51,592 were refused (approx 52.5% of the total, or nearly 80% of the total).
5 -
Only 20% of POPLA appeals are now being won which is far lower than previous years and shows the Joint Code is IMHO, massively bent in favour of the operators and POPLA are stuck with it.
The IAS is such a kangaroo court, I can't even be bothered to look at their latest joke report, but it sounds like they are still hiding the number of appeals adjudicated in favour of motorists (usually 5%).
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD4 -
It's only a short report but I couldn't see a upheld/rejected rate or figures anywhere in it!
1 -
Compare that to previous years where an average of 5% were decided in favour of the consumer.
In fact, the RAC already did:
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
What was interesting is that in the foreword of the 2025 report the new lead adjudicator David Finney stated a more in depth "narrative report will follow in due course". What that actually means and whether that will actually happen given the open ended nature of "in due course" we will have to wait and see.
3 -
"In due course" …. taking a lead from the MHCLG …. aka 'kicking the can down the road'!
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



