PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

What’s wrong with this property

Options
1242526272830»

Comments

  • ReadySteadyPop
    ReadySteadyPop Posts: 1,652 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Did the OP ever get an answer as to what was wrong with the property
    There is nothing physically wrong with the property, it is just overpriced hence the 75k asking price drop so far.
  • ReadySteadyPop
    ReadySteadyPop Posts: 1,652 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Herzlos said:
    Herzlos said:
    Herzlos said:
    Herzlos said:
    But rent also went up to cover the landlords bills, and tenants were evicted if landlords lost the houses. No-one apart from the super rich is safe from them. 

    It's all about timing which you can't predcit. If you buy right before a drop (like I did and ended up at about 110% LTV) then it can be brutal in the short term but it'll balance out over time. 

    You still need to live somewhere, right?

    It is a bit of an overgeneralization though, and verging a bit far into discussing the economy rather than houses. 
    More likely now that they will just continue to pay rent to the bank or other new owner, much harder to evict now, and even back then this happened in lots of cases, many young people will just run back to parents if the rental goes bad so that means even more supply hitting the market.

    Really? Can you cite something to support that?

    Because everything I've looked up indicates that outside a few niche cases the lender is likely to start eviction immediately in order to auction the property off. You might get a few months but you're not secure.

    And that's assuming the landlord doesn't start the eviction process themselves to try and sell before reposession. 
    I`m not clear what point you are trying to make

    I'm responding to what seems to be your claim that renting in a recession is safer than a mortgage because even if the house is reposessed you don't get evicted, but I can't find anything online to back that up and hoping you do. 
    Another poster described their memories of the 80`s housing crash, you seem to disagree with this memory or don`t like their version of reality, II am not sure which it is?

    I was responding to your claim of "More likely now that they will just continue to pay rent to the bank or other new owner" in relation to renting when the bank reposesses a rental property. 

    I have no experience of the 1980's housing crash, or the boom that immediately followed, nor do I think it's particuarly relevant given it was over 40 years ago and the world is drastically different. I was talking about a hypothetical future crash and how renting isn't more stable than owning. 
    I don`t believe repossessions or evictions are desirable now, for many reasons, the 80`s was a very different time in that respect, the PTB and banks will try to avoid this scenario at all costs because it would play really badly against the present political backdrop. The boom didn`t immediately follow, the real boom started to happen when interest rates started to be lowered in the early 2000`s and then really cut after 2008, we are now entering  a phase that is the complete opposite of that time.

     How people react in a crisis isn`t different to 40 years ago (well we don`t REALLY know because there hasn`t been a proper crisis for decades) the financial system may have evolved (for the worse many would say) but human emotions have not evolved in that time, fear and greed are the drivers in the stock and housing markets.

     If you were renting from a private landlord with no mortgage or who had borrowed sensibly and could afford their debt that would be much safer than buying one of these flats for 400k or 500k (!) and then hitting a job loss and possible higher interest rates. The OP is right to be cautious and I hope they will update us on their flat search?
  • ReadySteadyPop
    ReadySteadyPop Posts: 1,652 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Herzlos said:
    Herzlos said:
    Herzlos said:
    Herzlos said:
    But rent also went up to cover the landlords bills, and tenants were evicted if landlords lost the houses. No-one apart from the super rich is safe from them. 

    It's all about timing which you can't predcit. If you buy right before a drop (like I did and ended up at about 110% LTV) then it can be brutal in the short term but it'll balance out over time. 

    You still need to live somewhere, right?

    It is a bit of an overgeneralization though, and verging a bit far into discussing the economy rather than houses. 
    More likely now that they will just continue to pay rent to the bank or other new owner, much harder to evict now, and even back then this happened in lots of cases, many young people will just run back to parents if the rental goes bad so that means even more supply hitting the market.

    Really? Can you cite something to support that?

    Because everything I've looked up indicates that outside a few niche cases the lender is likely to start eviction immediately in order to auction the property off. You might get a few months but you're not secure.

    And that's assuming the landlord doesn't start the eviction process themselves to try and sell before reposession. 
    I`m not clear what point you are trying to make

    I'm responding to what seems to be your claim that renting in a recession is safer than a mortgage because even if the house is reposessed you don't get evicted, but I can't find anything online to back that up and hoping you do. 
    Another poster described their memories of the 80`s housing crash, you seem to disagree with this memory or don`t like their version of reality, II am not sure which it is?

    I was responding to your claim of "More likely now that they will just continue to pay rent to the bank or other new owner" in relation to renting when the bank reposesses a rental property. 

    I have no experience of the 1980's housing crash, or the boom that immediately followed, nor do I think it's particuarly relevant given it was over 40 years ago and the world is drastically different. I was talking about a hypothetical future crash and how renting isn't more stable than owning. 
    "Owning" isn`t the same as having mortgage debt, someone who owns their property doesn`t care what happens in the bond/credit markets.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,236 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Did the OP ever get an answer as to what was wrong with the property
    Yes. In amongst the bickering, there have been some nuggets of advice. :)

     
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.