We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How can 1 US company be worth more than the top 350 UK companies?
Options
Comments
-
I would say the US is a bigger country, has more talent available and way more money and innovation. That is pretty much the reason they are bigger. Also they are tech companies. The UK really can't compete at the same levels, also the fact we are a small country, without any real money and a slowly sinking economy. Then add in an anti business government and the fact we are losing all the big companies due to government policies. The list just goes on and on.I have a friend (from Uni) in the US that used to work for Nvidia. He said the competition for any job was steep. You would have 100 people, all with high end degrees, masters and possibly Ph.D level, trying to get those jobs. The company paid top notch levels for the talent and no expense was spared, because they knew keeping those employees happy meant better quality work, more innovation, good employee morale. Compare that to people working at a high end UK tech company.I admit I had to think hard and do research because I don't think we have any companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple and guess what, we don't have any top tier tech companies in this country. That's the rub I guess. We can't attract talent of that level, we have no real companies of that level (except maybe ARM) and they really aren't in the same league as say Nvidia or Apple.1
-
Pathfinder000 said:I would say the US is a bigger country, has more talent available and way more money and innovation. That is pretty much the reason they are bigger. Also they are tech companies. The UK really can't compete at the same levels, also the fact we are a small country, without any real money and a slowly sinking economy. Then add in an anti business government and the fact we are losing all the big companies due to government policies. The list just goes on and on.I have a friend (from Uni) in the US that used to work for Nvidia. He said the competition for any job was steep. You would have 100 people, all with high end degrees, masters and possibly Ph.D level, trying to get those jobs. The company paid top notch levels for the talent and no expense was spared, because they knew keeping those employees happy meant better quality work, more innovation, good employee morale. Compare that to people working at a high end UK tech company.I admit I had to think hard and do research because I don't think we have any companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple and guess what, we don't have any top tier tech companies in this country. That's the rub I guess. We can't attract talent of that level, we have no real companies of that level (except maybe ARM) and they really aren't in the same league as say Nvidia or Apple.
We have some of the best universities in the world where people flock from all over the world fighting to get a place, yet that doesn't seem to translate to tech start ups.
Why our government is so anti capitalist / anti business is baffling to me. They really should just stand back and let our businesses flourish.
The only tech company we have is ARM but once the open source free to use RISC-V architecture is fleshed out ARM will probably end up obsolete. We have a couple companies like Relx and Sage but yeah it's pretty dead on the island nowadays. Just Turkish barbers, vape shops, takeaways, nail salons, pubs and off licences.
Oh and banks, oils, insurance and pharma.
1 -
I sort of feel there is also a culture around arts and sport that trumpets the attitude - these are so important for everyon'e life, wealth and happiness and "scientists" [unspecified] are baddies that make terrible things happen in the world.Then you get what can be a particularly toxic culture in some industries whereby there is too much micromanagement, and a Government attitude of "blue sky research is useless it doesn't have any relevance to current social problems".It all adds up to many years of undermining people's attitudes to taking on risk, whether that be not supporting in-company scientific work, failing to encourage those who don't appreciate spending time in endless meetings to contribute in other ways, or generally not presenting scientific topics as interesting and worth while for everyone to understand.Without an atmosphere that encourages scientific enquiry and technical abilities generally we likely won't be able to foster the growth of even those few tech-based start ups that are successful. Then you have our ability to let any and every type of smaller UK company be sold to overseas financers because raising capital here isn't a simple process.1
-
SneakySpectator said:
0 -
masonic said:Perhaps they are overvalued.
Tesla ~ $1 tn
Ford ~ $40 bn3 -
Middle_of_the_Road said:masonic said:Perhaps they are overvalued.
Tesla ~ $1 tn
Ford ~ $40 bn1 -
Middle_of_the_Road said:masonic said:Perhaps they are overvalued.
Tesla ~ $1 tn
Ford ~ $40 bn1 -
Middle_of_the_Road said:masonic said:Perhaps they are overvalued.
Tesla ~ $1 tn
Ford ~ $40 bn
One is wondering how to stay relevant in a rapidly evolving marketplace (and they are far from alone).2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards