We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Court Claim Letter - Here we go again - Acknowledgement of Service



I have ignored everything, and truly cannot remember my defence - other than I either over stayed by 20 minutes, or I automatically parked in a car park 20 yards away and entered the incorrect one in the Pay App.
I assume step one is:
Acknowledgement of Claim
And (1) I Intend to defend all of this claim.
My question is: Is it now too late to ask for SAR - as I cannot recall anything, to have them reveal their evidence right?
Comments
-
Post the issue date from the claim form
Do not email a SAR at this stage, ignorance is bliss
Yes, dispute all of it, defend in full ( evidence comes at the WS stage in several months time )
Your defence rebuts the POC, so copy and adapt the paragraphs 2 & 3 from any recent thread within the last 6 weeks, posting your draft paragraphs below ( do not post the rest of the template, but you will be using all of it at submission time )
Ps, your password is unredacted2 -
So you appear to be using the alternative Chan & Akande defence template, so let's see your paragraphs 6 & 7 too
Your AOS is done online, on MCOL, following the advice in the Dropbox link in the newbies sticky thread in announcements, do that and only that for now
Your defence pdf will be emailed in a few weeks time
1 -
You need to show us the claim form.
If it's Gladstones or Moorside Legal, @troublemaker22 will assist you free of charge. He's a solicitor (someone who I know personally) who is doing strike out applications pro bono for those cases. No fees (not even the court fee to pay). All raising money for charity.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Bachelorplace, I've sent you a DM2
-
What lovely people we should all have cigars -
Defence to AOSPreliminary Matter: Application to Strike Out the Claim
-
The Particulars of Claim (POC) are vague, incoherent, and appear to be a generic cut-and-paste template. They fail to comply with Civil Procedure Rule (CPR) 16.4, and Practice Directions 16PD3 and 16PD7, as they do not state all facts necessary to disclose a complete cause of action.
-
The Defendant invites the Court to strike out the claim pursuant to CPR 3.4, on the basis that it discloses no reasonable grounds and is an abuse of process.
-
The Defendant relies on two persuasive appeal decisions where similar claims were struck out due to inadequate pleadings:
-
Civil Enforcement Ltd v Chan (15 August 2023, HHJ Murch), where the court found the POC insufficient to establish a cause of action.
-
Car Park Management Services Ltd v Akande (HHJ Evans), confirming the requirement for clear and complete particulars.
-
-
The Defendant reserves the right to amend or supplement this Defence should further particulars be served.
Substantive Defence
-
The Defendant denies that the elements necessary to establish liability, including the existence of a valid contract or a breach thereof, have been met.
-
The charge imposed is, in all the circumstances, a penalty and not enforceable. It is fully distinguished from the decision in ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67, which does not apply on the facts of this case.
-
The alleged ‘core debt’ cannot exceed £100—the statutory and industry cap for private parking charges.
-
It is denied that any ‘Debt Recovery Costs’ or damages were incurred or paid by the Claimant. No evidence has been provided, and such charges are false additions intended to inflate the claim artificially.
-
This claim is unfair and exaggerated. The Claimant routinely adds a fixed sum per PCN, despite clear Government intent to ban such practices under the Parking (Code of Practice) Act 2019, due to recognised ‘market failure’.
-
The claim is entirely denied. No sum is due in debt or damages.
Enclosing the form thing.
0 -
-
Bachelorplace said:
Date of issues 28 May 2025.
With a Claim Issue Date of 28th May, you have until Monday 16th June 2025 to file an Acknowledgment of Service('AOS'), but there is nothing to be gained by delaying it.To file an AOS, follow the guidance in the Dropbox file linked from the second post in the NEWBIES thread.Having filed an AOS in a timely manner, you have until 4pm on Monday 30th June 2025 to file a Defence.That's over four weeks away. Plenty of time to produce a Defence, but please don't leave it to the last minute.To create a Defence, and then file a Defence by email, look again at the second post on the NEWBIES thread - immediately following where you found the AOS guidance.Don't miss the deadline for filing an AOS, nor that for filing a Defence.
Do not try and file a Defence via the MoneyClaimOnline website. Once an AOS has been filed, the MCOL website should be treated as 'read only'.3 -
I don't think the Chan and Akande cases are relevant to your PoC.3
-
No, and a strike out was only suggested if it's Gladstones or Moorside Legal, but it isn't.
Just do the usual Template Defence.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
Please delete that. Let's make the thread manageable! Your thread is becoming too long, we never need to see the whole defence and we've already explained that is the WRONG START.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.2K Spending & Discounts
- 243.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards