We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Advice with First-Time Investing
Comments
-
justme8786 said:
It sounds good but I think my mum already has a SIPP, soon to be in my name, which mainly invests into that exact fund haha maybe not the best idea to have it twice.justme8786 said:First time investing solo. I already have some investments in an ISA but these are ones that my (wonderful) mum set up for me ages ago and I am only now starting to really look into my finances. She died recently so there is a lot to try to manage at the moment as well as starting uni.
The ones I have there are all active investments: European Assets Trust PLC, The Global Smaller etc. From the research I have done so far, a more passive approach would be preferred, with less individual funds. I am thinking of selling all the ones I have and buying an 80/20 stocks & bonds mix, just with something like HSBC All World Index plus some GILTS for a little stability.
I will be adding to this ISA as much as I can.
Would this do or is more diversification necessary? My age is 20 so hopefully I have a long horizon. Thank you
You'll be building your own SIPP and ISA from now on, for decades, perhaps revisit the inherited products in a few months or so - you've enough on just now - unless there is a pressing need to release cash. Take a breath.1 -
At your age I wouldn’t be bothering with gilts or bonds at all. I’d go 100% equity. Unless you are thinking that you will need a certain amount of money available in five years time in which case yes, keep that amount out of equities and in gilts or mmfs. Bonds imo are not for anyone who is more than ten years from retirement.4
-
Sorry to hear about your loss.
The answer to your question depends on your investment goals. Is this the beginning of your pension journey? Is the goal to save enough so that when you are in your mid-thirties you will be able to buy a home? Or perhaps you would like to go to university or take some full-time training within the next few years. Each of these goals would require a different investing approach for it to be realised.
2 -
kempiejon said:justme8786 said:
It sounds good but I think my mum already has a SIPP, soon to be in my name, which mainly invests into that exact fund haha maybe not the best idea to have it twice.justme8786 said:First time investing solo. I already have some investments in an ISA but these are ones that my (wonderful) mum set up for me ages ago and I am only now starting to really look into my finances. She died recently so there is a lot to try to manage at the moment as well as starting uni.
The ones I have there are all active investments: European Assets Trust PLC, The Global Smaller etc. From the research I have done so far, a more passive approach would be preferred, with less individual funds. I am thinking of selling all the ones I have and buying an 80/20 stocks & bonds mix, just with something like HSBC All World Index plus some GILTS for a little stability.
I will be adding to this ISA as much as I can.
Would this do or is more diversification necessary? My age is 20 so hopefully I have a long horizon. Thank you
You'll be building your own SIPP and ISA from now on, for decades, perhaps revisit the inherited products in a few months or so - you've enough on just now - unless there is a pressing need to release cash. Take a breath.
The SIPP I plan to transfer into my name and leave untouched for my pension. I have doubts about the individual funds though, I've received paperwork and it looks like some aren't doing so well. Maybe I just leave it anyway.
Regarding the ISA, there is just so much I've read about it being wise not to have actively managed funds due to the high fees and unlikeliness of 'beating the market', which is why I am considering selling.
But you're right maybe I just leave it all where it is and if I want to try the All World Index passive investment I do it with money I will earn myself. But I'm worried that this way I'd be diluting potential cumulative gains.0 -
thunderroad88 said:At your age I wouldn’t be bothering with gilts or bonds at all. I’d go 100% equity. Unless you are thinking that you will need a certain amount of money available in five years time in which case yes, keep that amount out of equities and in gilts or mmfs. Bonds imo are not for anyone who is more than ten years from retirement.0
-
Eyeful said:You are doing OK for someone of 20 years old.
The should be of interest to you. Hope it is of help to you.
1. https://www.kroijer.com/
2. https://monevator.com/passive-fund-of-funds-the-rivals/
3. https://monevator.com/best-global-tracker-funds/
4. Idea of Global Multi Asset Fund.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGQ9KyQq8Jw
0 -
justme8786 said:The SIPP I plan to transfer into my name and leave untouched for my pension. I have doubts about the individual funds though, I've received paperwork and it looks like some aren't doing so well. Maybe I just leave it anyway.
Regarding the ISA, there is just so much I've read about it being wise not to have actively managed funds due to the high fees and unlikeliness of 'beating the market', which is why I am considering selling.
But you're right maybe I just leave it all where it is and if I want to try the All World Index passive investment I do it with money I will earn myself. But I'm worried that this way I'd be diluting potential cumulative gains.
If you're interested in the opinion of faceless idiots online post a list of all the funds and percentages in each in the ISA and the SIPP I'm sure they'll be opinions.
I agree though, an all world passive tracker will collect just under market return after fees and is easy and generally actively managed funds long term don't do better than that for a larger fee.0 -
kempiejon said:justme8786 said:The SIPP I plan to transfer into my name and leave untouched for my pension. I have doubts about the individual funds though, I've received paperwork and it looks like some aren't doing so well. Maybe I just leave it anyway.
Regarding the ISA, there is just so much I've read about it being wise not to have actively managed funds due to the high fees and unlikeliness of 'beating the market', which is why I am considering selling.
But you're right maybe I just leave it all where it is and if I want to try the All World Index passive investment I do it with money I will earn myself. But I'm worried that this way I'd be diluting potential cumulative gains.
If you're interested in the opinion of faceless idiots online post a list of all the funds and percentages in each in the ISA and the SIPP I'm sure they'll be opinions.
I agree though, an all world passive tracker will collect just under market return after fees and is easy and generally actively managed funds long term don't do better than that for a larger fee.
Yes I have been toying with that idea, maybe I will. Any opinion no matter how idiotic could be of use.
Do you think there could be a benefit to having two s&s ISAs, one for actively managed funds and one for a passive All World Index investment?
And, I was thinking an 80/20 equity/bond split, I read somewhere that the general rule for % in equities is 100 - your age, but someone commented that at my age it would be wiser to just go for 100% equities. Would you agree? I have some savings too so it is not like I'd be without cash, but it is not a ton. Although I am planning to earn, and earn well.0 -
justme8786 said:kempiejon said:jjustme8786 said:The SIPP I plan to transfer into my name and leave untouched for my pension. I have doubts about the individual funds though, I've received paperwork and it looks like some aren't doing so well. Maybe I just leave it anyway.
Regarding the ISA, there is just so much I've read about it being wise not to have actively managed funds due to the high fees and unlikeliness of 'beating the market', which is why I am considering selling.
But you're right maybe I just leave it all where it is and if I want to try the All World Index passive investment I do it with money I will earn myself. But I'm worried that this way I'd be diluting potential cumulative gains.
If you're interested in the opinion of faceless idiots online post a list of all the funds and percentages in each in the ISA and the SIPP I'm sure they'll be opinions.
I agree though, an all world passive tracker will collect just under market return after fees and is easy and generally actively managed funds long term don't do better than that for a larger fee.
Yes I have been toying with that idea, maybe I will. Any opinion no matter how idiotic could be of use.
Do you think there could be a benefit to having two s&s ISAs, one for actively managed funds and one for a passive All World Index investment?
And, I was thinking an 80/20 equity/bond split, I read somewhere that the general rule for % in equities is 100 - your age, but someone commented that at my age it would be wiser to just go for 100% equities. Would you agree? I have some savings too so it is not like I'd be without cash, but it is not a ton. Although I am planning to earn, and earn well.
Ideally I think you should also hold an amount of cash in a mixture of fixed interest vehicles like mmfs, gilts or fixed term high street deposit accounts, probably laddered from 1-5 years, so you aren’t tying up all your cash for too long.
The remainder which is money you are pretty sure you won’t want for 5 years, what I’d call your investable cash, I’d put in a a global tracker. HSBC Ftse All World C is my personal favourite. You could just leave it at that for the utmost simplicity. My son who is only a few years older than you has done that, although he’s also added a slight tilt towards big tech by holding a bit in L&G Global Technology. He invests any spare cash monthly, 90% into HSBC and 10% L&G. He also has a LISA in which he holds only Royal London Short Term Fixed Income, but he is adamant he will be buying a property in the next few years, that may not be of any relevance to you. Good luck whatever path you take.1 -
justme8786 said:
Yes I have been toying with that idea, maybe I will. Any opinion no matter how idiotic could be of use.
Do you think there could be a benefit to having two s&s ISAs, one for actively managed funds and one for a passive All World Index investment?
And, I was thinking an 80/20 equity/bond split, I read somewhere that the general rule for % in equities is 100 - your age, but someone commented that at my age it would be wiser to just go for 100% equities. Would you agree? I have some savings too so it is not like I'd be without cash, but it is not a ton. Although I am planning to earn, and earn well.As mentioned, it's very rare for actively managed funds (or self picks) to beat a passive global index over the long run, but people who have an interest in finance can't resist tinkering, so one remedy is to keep 90% of the value in a simple global index tracker and allow 10% for 'other' investments, such as an active fund. The point is to make sure you always keep 90% in the tracker and you don't touch it (other than to keep paying in).Bond splits are usually to dampen volatility - in some circumstances when equities fall, bonds increase in value, so if you need to make a withdrawal before equities have recovered then the theory is the bond proportion will have increased so you don't make too much of a loss. It's all about withdrawal, so if you need to withdraw in under 10yrs then having some bonds in the mix may make sense. But if you're investing for 10+ years, less so. However it's also about your own risk tolerance - if you'll panic when you see a fall in value then you may have to give up some return in order to dial down the volatility.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards