PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Ways of reducing the stamp duty?

Hi guys.
I currently own a property (26 years remaining on the mortgage). I currently have a consent to let on it at the moment.
That was before I got married.

I am now married. My wife is a first time buyer. We are looking into purchasing a property together but I didn’t realise how hefty the Stamp Duty would be.

Our budget is 450k. 
Based on that, the stamp duty if we were to just simply put both of our names on the deed and mortgage, would be £35k. 

I’m wondering if the stamp duty would be reduced if we do any of the following:
- I transfer my current property and the mortgage to her. I then buy the property we’re looking at with me as the sole owner and sole name on the mortgage (I’m told I’ll be able to get a mortgage with just my salary alone)
- We do a sole proprietor joint mortgage on the house we’re looking to buy.
- Sell my current house and buy one together.
- Transfer my current property to my mum but keep me in the mortgage, and then buy the other property with my wife.

Is there anything I could do to reduce the tax bill?

«1

Comments

  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,318 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 8 May at 5:51PM
    The only sensible option is to sell your existing property. The others either don't work because mortgage lenders won't cooperate, or fail because your spouse will be deemed to have a beneficial interest even if she's not an owner on paper (and the SDLT rules catch "other" properties owned by a spouse anyway).
  • housebuyer143
    housebuyer143 Posts: 4,162 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I suppose you could put the rental in a limited company but that has it's own costs. 
    Aside from that, selling it prior to buying a new one is the way to reduce it. 
  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,584 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Buy a cheaper house: Obvs.
  • saajan_12
    saajan_12 Posts: 4,785 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    tloz123 said:
    Hi guys.
    I currently own a property (26 years remaining on the mortgage). I currently have a consent to let on it at the moment.
    That was before I got married.

    I am now married. My wife is a first time buyer. We are looking into purchasing a property together but I didn’t realise how hefty the Stamp Duty would be.

    Our budget is 450k. 
    Based on that, the stamp duty if we were to just simply put both of our names on the deed and mortgage, would be £35k. 

    I’m wondering if the stamp duty would be reduced if we do any of the following:
    a) I transfer my current property and the mortgage to her. I then buy the property we’re looking at with me as the sole owner and sole name on the mortgage (I’m told I’ll be able to get a mortgage with just my salary alone) 
    b) We do a sole proprietor joint mortgage on the house we’re looking to buy.
    c) Sell my current house and buy one together.
    d) Transfer my current property to my mum but keep me in the mortgage, and then buy the other property with my wife.

    Is there anything I could do to reduce the tax bill?

    a) No. The new property will still be the 2nd property for you as a married couple, so you'd still incur the higher rate stamp duty. You could actually also incur MORE stamp duty on the 1st property if the outstanding mortgage is high enough. 

    b) No. The new property will still be the 2nd property for you as a married couple, so you'd still incur the higher rate stamp duty. 

    c) Yes. Sell first and the SDLT will drop to 12.5k. 

    d) No, its based on beneficial interest so if you remain on the mortgage you'll be seen to still effectively own the property, so the new property is a 2nd property for the couple, so higher rate SDLT. 
  • p00hsticks
    p00hsticks Posts: 14,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Also think that d) may possibly involve some CGT having to be paid ?
  • Bookworm225
    Bookworm225 Posts: 197 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 9 May at 9:55AM
    Also think that d) may possibly involve some CGT having to be paid ?
    since the property appears to be now let that is correct, CGT would be triggered on transfer (using current market value as it involves a "connected person" - mother!)
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 17,760 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 9 May at 10:53AM
    The only detail the OP does not seem to have advised is where the OP and wife live presently.

    The wife is FTB.
    The OP has a BTL.
    Do they currently live in a property that is rented, or in a property that is owned (albeit with mortgage) by the OP?
    If they currently live in a property that is owned by the OP, then selling and buying will be exempt from additional SDLT under PPR rules, despite the OP also owning the BTL.
  • tloz123
    tloz123 Posts: 11 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    Also think that d) may possibly involve some CGT having to be paid ?
    since the property appears to be now let that is correct, CGT would be triggered on transfer (using current market value as it involves a "connected person" - mother!)
    Ah interesting. So HMRC defines “connected person” as family?
  • tloz123
    tloz123 Posts: 11 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    The only detail the OP does not seem to have advised is where the OP and wife live presently.

    The wife is FTB.
    The OP has a BTL.
    Do they currently live in a property that is rented, or in a property that is owned (albeit with mortgage) by the OP?
    If they currently live in a property that is owned by the OP, then selling and buying will be exempt from additional SDLT under PPR rules, despite the OP also owning the BTL.
    Currently living in a rented flat at the moment.
  • tloz123
    tloz123 Posts: 11 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    saajan_12 said:

    d) No, its based on beneficial interest so if you remain on the mortgage you'll be seen to still effectively own the property, so the new property is a 2nd property for the couple, so higher rate SDLT. 
    But what if I have a deed of trust to explicitly show that I don’t want anything from my current property? I.e. not showing financial interest
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.