We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Tax payable on lease extension for freeholders

Tom86uk
Posts: 3 Newbie

Hello,
I can see a number of other posts on this matter but no one seems to have reached a conclusion.
We are 5 freeholders, with 90 year leasehold interests in our flats (held via a company). We wish to extend these interests to 999 years.
We have spoken to law firms and tax advisers all with very different views on the tax implications of such an extension (some not aware of any tax implications, others say CGT is due and others corporation tax).
I can see a number of other posts on this matter but no one seems to have reached a conclusion.
We are 5 freeholders, with 90 year leasehold interests in our flats (held via a company). We wish to extend these interests to 999 years.
We have spoken to law firms and tax advisers all with very different views on the tax implications of such an extension (some not aware of any tax implications, others say CGT is due and others corporation tax).
Has anyone actually extended their leasehold interest and was any tax due?
Thank you!
Thank you!
0
Comments
-
Have those that have said taxes are due explained why? Some may not be willing to give you a handheld explanation unless you are paying for their advice.
Were it an arms length contract (ie the freeholder was the typical faceless corporation) what would the sorts of values you'd be having to pay the freeholder to extend the lease?
I'm no tax expert but could see arguments either for corporation tax, ie the tax the company would have paid on the monies received to extend the leases given the general principles of arms length contracts between related parties. Possibly CGT on a personal level having received an increase in value of the property via a transaction for which no consideration was paid... though in my mind it would be the difference in value which may not be that much in a share of freehold situation.
Can't help but can bump the thread... coincidently a friend is in a similar situation also with 90 years to run now and they looked into the same a couple of years ago but were also told taxes applied and so didnt proceed.0 -
This reasin seems to be both are right! This might help
https://www.penningtonslaw.com/news-publications/latest-news/2024/how-to-handle-tax-on-residential-lease-extensions0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards