We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Interactive Investor - calculation of 25% tax free cash when holding Index Linked Gilts
Options
Comments
-
Lowtrawler said:Another disappointment. AJ Bell have confirmed they apply the same treatment as Interactive Investor.
The Ombudsman has confirmed my complaint and I will advise when there is any progress.I think....1 -
Further bad news. HL have also confirmed they use the clean price when it comes to the PCLS.
Charles Stanley appears to be the only area of hope although I haven't confirmed with them personally, relying on the discussion earlier in this thread. I will wait for the Ombudsman to rule before reviewing my options.
Personally, I think it's crazy the 3 biggest SIPP platforms cannot value IL gilts accurately, at least on key events like a PCLS. How they can claim the clean price is a market price when 4 IL Gilts have a dirty price more than twice the clean is quite beyond me.
It would be entirely possible for me to hold £300k of IL Gilts (when valued at the dirty price) and £100k in cash, expecting to take the £100k cash as a PCLS, only to find the gilts being valued at £150k and so finding my PCLS limited to £62.5k. Let's see what the ombudsman says.0 -
Have you pointed out to ombudsman that CS manages to value them correctly?0
-
TheGreenFrog said:Have you pointed out to ombudsman that CS manages to value them correctly?
I haven't even addressed the potential for inheritance tax planning. If the platforms do the same valuation as part of an estate, anyone with assets should probably hold T30I. The dirty price is almost 3x the clean and so remove almost 2/3rds the value for inheritance tax.1 -
I think T30I may be a bad example - that is an old gilt and they can give you a clean price which is much nearer the dirty price 337.8 vs 339.167 according to this
Gilts in Issue - giltsyield.com1 -
DRS1 said:I think T30I may be a bad example - that is an old gilt and they can give you a clean price which is much nearer the dirty price 337.8 vs 339.167 according to this
Gilts in Issue - giltsyield.com0 -
TheGreenFrog said:Have you pointed out to ombudsman that CS manages to value them correctly?
If you buy an orange it's never going to be an Apple. No amount of complaining can change rudimentary facts.
0 -
kempiejon said:michaels said:I assume no one else is thinking this sounds like a potential inheritance tax dodge....
Partially on this topic - am I correct in thinking that although II nominally split a pot into crystallised and uncrystallised components, you can not actually manage the assets in the two pots separately (for example more growth orientated in the uncrystallised, more defensive in the crystallised)? Are there platforms that separate the two pots? I currently have a mix of assets and in theory would like to crystallise some of them into a crystallised pot and leave others in an uncrystallised pot.I think....0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards