Parking Group (The Parking People) DCB LEGAL claim 2025

Dalhousie105

OK I don't understand.  MCOL says:

Defence was struck out on 18/12/2025

Defence was struck out on 19/12/2025

A judgment was issued against you on 30/12/2025 at 19:10:41 

Says "Document Status: Rejected" when I click on "Defense" in MCOL

I had no mediation phone call which I was waiting for.  I asked for my case to be heard at a hearing as I wanted to present my photo evidence.  

Not sure I recall an Allocation Questionaire.  I sent off an N180 Form and submitted my defense on the MCOL website (checked and it is still there in full)

How can my defense just be rejected?  Here is  paragraph 3 and 3.1:

3. Referring to the POC: paragraph 1 is denied. The Defendant is
not indebted to the Claimant. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant
does not accept that a contravention occurred on 23/07/2024, as
alleged. Whilst the Defendant was the registered keeper and
driver, paragraphs 3 and 4 are denied. The Defendant is not liable
and has seen no evidence of a breach of prominent terms. The
quantum is hugely exaggerated (no PCN can be £170 on private land)
and there were no damages incurred whatsoever.

3.1 The Defendant pulled into the carpark for a short while and
did not leave the vehicle. No signage was seen or was visible. It
is maintained that no valid contract was offered and there is no
contractual relationship between the two parties. The defendant
has photographic evidence that the signage was not visible as it
pointed away from the defendant’s direction of travel and is
impossible to see on approach and on entry to the car park. The
defendant submitted an appeal but received no response and so was
denied having their case reviewed by POPLA. The defendant then
sent a letter of complaint to the claimant, asking for an appeal
rejection letter to be sent and for a valid POPLA code to be
provided. The defendant received no response to this request
either. The defendant has copies of all correspondence sent.

Or is status "Rejected" as they believe I did not respond and have ruled against me?

I need to act swiftly to avoid a CCJ but am now questioning if it is worth the gamble to pay £313 to try and have the judgement set aside.  Surely as I can prove I sent the form twice and the mistake lies with the court I can claim this back?  Is it worth fighting or do I just cut my losses?

Thanks

Gr1pr

Concentrate on the N180 DQ document stage 

You received a Letter containing the N180 DQ document on paper 

You said that you sent it back in September,  SENT IT interprets as posted 

Now you said it was emailed in September and again in October,  so how was it actually submitted. ?  In what format. ?

1) Paper. ?  POST. ?
2) Scanned Pictures ?
3) Pdf document. ?  . ( it should have been the digital N180 pdf document by email., the one with the unavailable dates. )

I suspect that you failed to use option 3 , so it wasn't logged 

Your MCOL claim history above is incomplete 

The latter information is probably due to the N180 DQ pdf document not being logged,  so the mediation stage and later hearing never got started

Dalhousie105

OK...

N180 was emailed both times to dq.cnbc@justice.gov.uk

Scanned pictures of all the pages (checked whole page was fully visable and readable)

I don't recall reading anything about a PDF document.  The N180 came in the post and the advice was to email it to dq.cnbc@justice.gov.uk.  I don't recall an electronic PDF being mentioned so I emailed it the only way I knew.  

The second time I emailed all the scanned paged in a zip file.  I also inserted all scanned pages into a word document which was also attached

This is my second email:   Surely it is reasonable to expect a reply if there was an issue?

Thanks

Gr1pr

OK, so they dont like scanned pictures in numerous previous cases on here,  hence my interrogation of the method 

The government website has pdf documents that can be filled in online and downloaded,  or downloaded and filled in, there is no government or MCOL or CNBC or MSE advice that mention pictures,  scans or zips

Your explanation confirms my suspicions 

Your complaint should focus on the lack of clarity and that you received automated replies indicating receipt of the 2 emails, and insist that they expunge the CCJ and log the DQ documents provided in good faith and within the time limits too

You can see several similar examples of this scenario on here over the last 6 months 

Definitely complain about it to HMCTS as soon as possible,  with proper explanations 

Let's see the section in your MCOL claim history before the sanctions were imposed

Car1980

Search the forum for "UNPROCESSED DOCUMENTS" for the correct email to send to them, and make a simultaneous formal complaint.

18 megs is too large for most emails though - usual is 10 or 15meg max.

Dalhousie105

will this all be turned around within the month deadline - its not worth a CCJ?

Dalhousie105

To cancel the judgment doesn't a judge have to look at it?

To do that I have to pay over £300?

Dalhousie105

Ok I need to complain/appeal

Who do I email?  dq.cnbc@justice.gov.uk?  I can't find a template anywhere.  Is there one for my situation?

Thanks

Gr1pr

Probably wont be done in a month, but your 2 complaints should be done ASAP,  following the advice i already gave you earlier 

No you don't pay, the CNBC will correct the error using their contracted judges, as they have done previously 

You can find lots of similar cases on here that you can learn from 

Dalhousie105

OK - I need to quickly complain to see if they will accept my unprocessed docs.

Who do I email?  CNB