We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
I got a CIFAS for receiving £85 for jackets
Options
Comments
-
Ayr_Rage said:born_again said:mintyjelly447 said:moneytorques said:
Then you say people are misunderstanding ?
You contested as you did not get the goods.
Then proceeded to take a payment for him, as his account had been closed due to your actions. & send the money to them. How if their account was closed.
I think you need to step back think about what you are saying. As that hole is getting deeper with each post..0 -
When are you going to have a face 2 face discussion with your friend over this issue.2
-
I - for one - can’t understand why Monzo thought any of this was sus.1
-
What seems to have happened here is that the OP was caught acting as a money mule, but is unrepentant and claims that he has done nothing wrong. That is not a good plea for clemency. Nonetheless, I believe that locking him out of the banking system entirely is unnecessarily harsh.Perhaps the solution is to have special money launderer's accounts. These accounts should not allow cash to be deposited. They should allow the accounts holder's salaries, pensions and benefits to be credited. They should also allow credits from the account holder's savings and investment accounts. All other credits should be blocked. Some other European countries have a right to a bank account. Surely, they must have a way of dealing with this.3
-
GeoffTF said:What seems to have happened here is that the OP was caught acting as a money mule, but is unrepentant and claims that he has done nothing wrong. That is not a good plea for clemency. Nonetheless, I believe that locking him out of the banking system entirely is unnecessarily harsh.Perhaps the solution is to have special money launderer's accounts. These accounts should not allow cash to be deposited. They should allow the accounts holder's salaries, pensions and benefits to be credited. They should also allow credits from the account holder's savings and investment accounts. All other credits should be blocked. Some other European countries have a right to a bank account. Surely, they must have a way of dealing with this.
0 -
mintyjelly447 said:Ayr_Rage said:born_again said:mintyjelly447 said:moneytorques said:
Then you say people are misunderstanding ?
You contested as you did not get the goods.
Then proceeded to take a payment for him, as his account had been closed due to your actions. & send the money to them. How if their account was closed.
I think you need to step back think about what you are saying. As that hole is getting deeper with each post..
Sadly you have been caught out as a mule.... Plain & simple 🤷♀️Life in the slow lane4 -
GeoffTF said:What seems to have happened here is that the OP was caught acting as a money mule, but is unrepentant and claims that he has done nothing wrong. That is not a good plea for clemency. Nonetheless, I believe that locking him out of the banking system entirely is unnecessarily harsh.Perhaps the solution is to have special money launderer's accounts. These accounts should not allow cash to be deposited. They should allow the accounts holder's salaries, pensions and benefits to be credited. They should also allow credits from the account holder's savings and investment accounts. All other credits should be blocked. Some other European countries have a right to a bank account. Surely, they must have a way of dealing with this.
Let's Be Careful Out There0 -
born_again said:mintyjelly447 said:Ayr_Rage said:born_again said:mintyjelly447 said:moneytorques said:
Then you say people are misunderstanding ?
You contested as you did not get the goods.
Then proceeded to take a payment for him, as his account had been closed due to your actions. & send the money to them. How if their account was closed.
I think you need to step back think about what you are saying. As that hole is getting deeper with each post..
Sadly you have been caught out as a mule.... Plain & simple 🤷♀️0 -
Because you received £85 from somebody who was expecting a jacket and never received it. I assume they did to you what you did to your former friend i.e. put in a complaint to their bank about the receiving account. That is why you received the misuse of facility marker.4
-
mintyjelly447 said:born_again said:mintyjelly447 said:Ayr_Rage said:born_again said:mintyjelly447 said:moneytorques said:
Then you say people are misunderstanding ?
You contested as you did not get the goods.
Then proceeded to take a payment for him, as his account had been closed due to your actions. & send the money to them. How if their account was closed.
I think you need to step back think about what you are saying. As that hole is getting deeper with each post..
Sadly you have been caught out as a mule.... Plain & simple 🤷♀️Life in the slow lane0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards