We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

I got a CIFAS for receiving £85 for jackets

Options
145791013

Comments

  • mintyjelly447
    mintyjelly447 Posts: 35 Forumite
    10 Posts
    Ayr_Rage said:
    Yeah because I didn't actually do anything fraudulent. He was supposed to be my friend of whom I helped very much along the years so I did not think much of anything and I just trusted him. I see now that this has landed me in a hot mess
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81409709/#Comment_81409709

    Then you say people are misunderstanding ?

    You contested as you did not get the goods.
    Then proceeded to take a payment for him, as his account had been closed due to your actions. & send the money to them. How if their account was closed.

    I think you need to step back think about what you are saying. As that hole is getting deeper with each post..
    Th OP stated, somewhere, that his friend opened a new account and then sent the £80/85 to that new account.
    Yes this is what happened he opened a new account to which I sent it to
  • ChirpyChicken
    ChirpyChicken Posts: 1,476 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    When are you going to have a face 2 face discussion with your friend over this issue.
  • Desmond_Hume
    Desmond_Hume Posts: 275 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    I - for one - can’t understand why Monzo thought any of this was sus.
  • GeoffTF
    GeoffTF Posts: 2,023 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 20 April at 7:01PM
    What seems to have happened here is that the OP was caught acting as a money mule, but is unrepentant and claims that he has done nothing wrong. That is not a good plea for clemency. Nonetheless, I believe that locking him out of the banking system entirely is unnecessarily harsh.
    Perhaps the solution is to have special money launderer's accounts. These accounts should not allow cash to be deposited. They should allow the accounts holder's salaries, pensions and benefits to be credited. They should also allow credits from the account holder's savings and investment accounts. All other credits should be blocked. Some other European countries have a right to a bank account. Surely, they must have a way of dealing with this.
  • ChirpyChicken
    ChirpyChicken Posts: 1,476 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    GeoffTF said:
    What seems to have happened here is that the OP was caught acting as a money mule, but is unrepentant and claims that he has done nothing wrong. That is not a good plea for clemency. Nonetheless, I believe that locking him out of the banking system entirely is unnecessarily harsh.
    Perhaps the solution is to have special money launderer's accounts. These accounts should not allow cash to be deposited. They should allow the accounts holder's salaries, pensions and benefits to be credited. They should also allow credits from the account holder's savings and investment accounts. All other credits should be blocked. Some other European countries have a right to a bank account. Surely, they must have a way of dealing with this.
    He can get a passbook building society account without a problem
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,373 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Ayr_Rage said:
    Yeah because I didn't actually do anything fraudulent. He was supposed to be my friend of whom I helped very much along the years so I did not think much of anything and I just trusted him. I see now that this has landed me in a hot mess
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81409709/#Comment_81409709

    Then you say people are misunderstanding ?

    You contested as you did not get the goods.
    Then proceeded to take a payment for him, as his account had been closed due to your actions. & send the money to them. How if their account was closed.

    I think you need to step back think about what you are saying. As that hole is getting deeper with each post..
    Th OP stated, somewhere, that his friend opened a new account and then sent the £80/85 to that new account.
    Yes this is what happened he opened a new account to which I sent it to
    So back to the why did they not use that account for the payment?

    Sadly you have been caught out as a mule.... Plain & simple 🤷‍♀️
    Life in the slow lane
  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 6,053 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    edited 21 April at 9:57PM
    GeoffTF said:
    What seems to have happened here is that the OP was caught acting as a money mule, but is unrepentant and claims that he has done nothing wrong. That is not a good plea for clemency. Nonetheless, I believe that locking him out of the banking system entirely is unnecessarily harsh.
    Perhaps the solution is to have special money launderer's accounts. These accounts should not allow cash to be deposited. They should allow the accounts holder's salaries, pensions and benefits to be credited. They should also allow credits from the account holder's savings and investment accounts. All other credits should be blocked. Some other European countries have a right to a bank account. Surely, they must have a way of dealing with this.
    It is a bit illogical, get a marker as someone has paid money that doesn't belong to you into your account, get de-banked thereby  making someone else having money paid into their account that doesn't belong to them
    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • mintyjelly447
    mintyjelly447 Posts: 35 Forumite
    10 Posts
    Ayr_Rage said:
    Yeah because I didn't actually do anything fraudulent. He was supposed to be my friend of whom I helped very much along the years so I did not think much of anything and I just trusted him. I see now that this has landed me in a hot mess
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81409709/#Comment_81409709

    Then you say people are misunderstanding ?

    You contested as you did not get the goods.
    Then proceeded to take a payment for him, as his account had been closed due to your actions. & send the money to them. How if their account was closed.

    I think you need to step back think about what you are saying. As that hole is getting deeper with each post..
    Th OP stated, somewhere, that his friend opened a new account and then sent the £80/85 to that new account.
    Yes this is what happened he opened a new account to which I sent it to
    So back to the why did they not use that account for the payment?

    Sadly you have been caught out as a mule.... Plain & simple 🤷‍♀️
    I thought money mules from what I've seen and heard have £1000s of pounds put into their account. I was sent £85 with the reference referring to the jacket 'uniqlo' so I do not understand how I could have possibly been seen as a money mule and this leading to a misuse of facility marker. Then again I am a young person and I assume you are much older and so know the banking system better than I do but I feel like it is unfair.
  • lr1277
    lr1277 Posts: 2,138 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 22 April at 12:57AM
    Because you received £85 from somebody who was expecting a jacket and never received it. I assume they did to you what you did to your former friend i.e. put in a complaint to their bank about the receiving account. That is why you received the misuse of facility marker.
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,373 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Ayr_Rage said:
    Yeah because I didn't actually do anything fraudulent. He was supposed to be my friend of whom I helped very much along the years so I did not think much of anything and I just trusted him. I see now that this has landed me in a hot mess
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81409709/#Comment_81409709

    Then you say people are misunderstanding ?

    You contested as you did not get the goods.
    Then proceeded to take a payment for him, as his account had been closed due to your actions. & send the money to them. How if their account was closed.

    I think you need to step back think about what you are saying. As that hole is getting deeper with each post..
    Th OP stated, somewhere, that his friend opened a new account and then sent the £80/85 to that new account.
    Yes this is what happened he opened a new account to which I sent it to
    So back to the why did they not use that account for the payment?

    Sadly you have been caught out as a mule.... Plain & simple 🤷‍♀️
    I thought money mules from what I've seen and heard have £1000s of pounds put into their account. I was sent £85 with the reference referring to the jacket 'uniqlo' so I do not understand how I could have possibly been seen as a money mule and this leading to a misuse of facility marker. Then again I am a young person and I assume you are much older and so know the banking system better than I do but I feel like it is unfair.
    No, it can be any amount. 
    Life in the slow lane
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.