We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Plain English guidance on probate next steps
Options
Comments
-
Cobbler_tone said:Keep_pedalling said:Cobbler_tone said:Keep_pedalling said:If the house is in trust then he should be looking a a STEP solicitor not the Co-op. Unfortunately putting your house in trust complicates things significantly, and what should have been a simple process no longer is.I am sure after taking the appropriate advice and appropriate action it will be resolved. What I’ve learnt is that it sounds potentially complicated enough not to try and self serve, especially when grieving and trying to minimise adding unnecessary stress. TBH the financial side has been the least of our worries, hence why it has been over three months before we have tried stepping up to the inevitable act of sorting the affairs out.0
-
Keep_pedalling said:Cobbler_tone said:Keep_pedalling said:If the house is in trust then he should be looking a a STEP solicitor not the Co-op. Unfortunately putting your house in trust complicates things significantly, and what should have been a simple process no longer is.
Lots of questions and I am sure we will know exactly we need to do later, or any areas we need them to do. If it is a case of probate for her accounts I am sure we will do that ourselves, as have details in place of all of her accounts and assets. It's no issue to pay for anything where we need professional help and the main motivation is to do things right in line with the circumstances created, without creating any potential future headaches.
As I stated previously, I am sure the likes of the Co-op know what they are doing when they get the olds to part with £3k plus to do these things, although I am sure they cover themselves very robustly!0 -
Cobbler_tone said:Keep_pedalling said:Cobbler_tone said:Keep_pedalling said:If the house is in trust then he should be looking a a STEP solicitor not the Co-op. Unfortunately putting your house in trust complicates things significantly, and what should have been a simple process no longer is.
Lots of questions and I am sure we will know exactly we need to do later, or any areas we need them to do. If it is a case of probate for her accounts I am sure we will do that ourselves, as have details in place of all of her accounts and assets. It's no issue to pay for anything where we need professional help and the main motivation is to do things right in line with the circumstances created, without creating any potential future headaches.
As I stated previously, I am sure the likes of the Co-op know what they are doing when they get the olds to part with £3k plus to do these things, although I am sure they cover themselves very robustly!
These are generally considered highly inappropriate (especially for very modest sized estates) and frowned on by the majority of forum contributors here.
Make sure, Co op has dealt with registration of the Trust on HMRC's Trust register ( at some point) otherwise the children ( Trustees) maybe on the hook for non compliance penalties.
Assuming this trust was created by both parents well after March 2006, it is also potentially liable to 10 year anniversary IHT reporting obligations. So hopefully the property value is considerably below £650k in value (2 times the nil rate band) since 6% IHT charge maybe in point on the excess.
You may well have a steep learning curve with regard to the intricacies of this trust, and question exactly what benefit it was supposed to have achieved.0 -
Firstly, this was the parents doing, so had all happened before anyone was aware. Edited because a tad unfair. They did it for the right reasons to protect their assets for the children.
The (half) property and rest of the assets all go into a trust, with the children trustees.
I have just listened to the call and it sounds that complicated that you wouldn't want the stress of trying to unpick it all, dot the 'i's and cross the 't's.
Land registry, house valuations, registering trusts, probate, HMRC etc.
Helpful chap, all done for you at the bargain cost of £5k....
Time to reflect and decide whether there is a lot of smoke and mirrors and whether we can DIY. The reality is that the beneficiaries won't have the time and emotional capacity to cover everything off, which I am sure what they rely on.0 -
Cobbler_tone said:Firstly, this was the parents doing, so had all happened before anyone was aware. Edited because a tad unfair. They did it for the right reasons to protect their assets for the children.
The (half) property and rest of the assets all go into a trust, with the children trustees.
I have just listened to the call and it sounds that complicated that you wouldn't want the stress of trying to unpick it all, dot the 'i's and cross the 't's.
Land registry, house valuations, registering trusts, probate, HMRC etc.
Helpful chap, all done for you at the bargain cost of £5k....
Time to reflect and decide whether there is a lot of smoke and mirrors and whether we can DIY. The reality is that the beneficiaries won't have the time and emotional capacity to cover everything off, which I am sure what they rely on.
Frankly given that you say the children will not have the head space to operate a trust which will involve managing and investing the cash as trustees together with the ongoing annual trustee tax returns, the family should all sit down and soberly decide if they really want the bother of the trust given that its likely primary objective is potential protection from nursing home fees ( unless of course a 2nd marriage by father is also considered a possibility).
They are by no means committed to keeping it. They have ample time to execute a deed of variation of mother's will to redirect all the trust assets bound for the trust, back to father's absolute ownership. They can then help manage their father's affairs on a straight forward LOA basis, without the complexity of the trust. Alternatively they could just retain the house in trust, but all cash varied back to father's personal ownership thereby removing annual trust tax return compliance for trust income.
However if trust protection of all mother's assets is considered paramount, the £5k you quote is only the starting point of the professional fees to be levied in years to come if the children do not have the inclination to handle the annual trust work themselves.
Important to stress that as indicated above they have choices here.
1 -
poseidon1 said:Cobbler_tone said:Firstly, this was the parents doing, so had all happened before anyone was aware. Edited because a tad unfair. They did it for the right reasons to protect their assets for the children.
The (half) property and rest of the assets all go into a trust, with the children trustees.
I have just listened to the call and it sounds that complicated that you wouldn't want the stress of trying to unpick it all, dot the 'i's and cross the 't's.
Land registry, house valuations, registering trusts, probate, HMRC etc.
Helpful chap, all done for you at the bargain cost of £5k....
Time to reflect and decide whether there is a lot of smoke and mirrors and whether we can DIY. The reality is that the beneficiaries won't have the time and emotional capacity to cover everything off, which I am sure what they rely on.
Frankly given that you say the children will not have the head space to operate a trust which will involve managing and investing the cash as trustees together with the ongoing annual trustee tax returns, the family should all sit down and soberly decide if they really want the bother of the trust given that its likely primary objective is potential protection from nursing home fees ( unless of course a 2nd marriage by father is also considered a possibility).
They are by no means committed to keeping it. They have ample time to execute a deed of variation of mother's will to redirect all the trust assets bound for the trust, back to father's absolute ownership. They can then help manage their father's affairs on a straight forward LOA basis, without the complexity of the trust. Alternatively they could just retain the house in trust, but all cash varied back to father's personal ownership thereby removing annual trust tax return compliance for trust income.
However if trust protection of all mother's assets is considered paramount, the £5k you quote is only the starting point of the professional fees to be levied in years to come if the children do not have the inclination to handle the annual trust work themselves.
Important to stress that as indicated above they have choices here.
I pointed out to them the £5k is a drop in the ocean for peace of mind to get everything in place. Any annual maintenance won’t be an issue. They are very intelligent and capable people grieving their mother and sorting out 60 years worth of ‘stuff’ alongside full time careers. The OH retires next year and will be in a better position to do what needs doing. Eg part of the current process is to get two estate agents to provide valuations. Clearly possible but for £60 you let someone do it for you. Register the trust, the land registry process, apply for probate etc.
The parents priority was to ensure half the house was protected and that all monies went to the children. That will be achieved and after the initial set up I am sure can easily be maintained.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards