We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Will recent "events" cause a rethink of DC pensions?
Options
Comments
-
Universidad said:Bostonerimus1 said:It might be a good time to research Japan's lost decade. We might not be just looking at market volatility, we might be looking at years of low growth and poor returns.
This is not borne so much out of concern for future investments as the fact that so few people have decent amounts going in to their DC pensions... But a decade of terrible performance wouldn't help.
What the Govt could do is make some kind of tweak to improve the returns on annuities. Wouldn’t that fit with the overall desire to get money into circulation? Or is that only money in savings accounts?All subject to affordability…..Fashion on the Ration
2024 - 43/66 coupons used, carry forward 23
2025 - 62/891 -
Not that it would affect me but I was hoping that they would increase the employers contribution to autoenrollment from 3% to at least 5%. It is a pity that having been set up it is leaving people thinking that their retirement will be sorted when it is obvious to many us that it will not be enough.1
-
cfw1994 said:SouthCoastBoy said:For me, I think I will stick to my current plan. I've never held bonds, just cash, and I have at least a 10 year cash buffer. 60% in equities, lost around 150k in the last 2 to 3 weeks, but hoping over the next 5 or so years that will be regained. My total portfolio in nominal terms is back to around where it was 12 to 18 mths ago.
Think the last few weeks means I will carry on working for a while yet.It’s only money….my strategy remains as it was 🤷♂️
If things are still bad later in the year I’ll pause the drawdowns and we will move to “cash” assets (mostly PBs).If you have a 10 (TEN 😜) year cash buffer, why are you still working?The way Tariff tRump behaves is erratic….his tariff wars can just as easily flip in the next 2-3 weeks.
We are fresh back from a month in Les Arcs, which beats working hands down ⛷️🤣Life is for living, & once you have a plan for how to spend time away from the shackles of work, my recommendation is to crack on 👍
Off to Wales next week with 15 pals to celebrate my significant b’day (last autumn) by having 8 of us racing headfirst across a quarry at up to 100mph. Should be a blast! If weather holds, we might get a day up Yr Wyddfa (Snowdon).This puts you in a much more relaxed position than the majority of people who have to rely solely on their DC pensions
I dont mean to say this to be unpleasant, just stating a fact. Apologies if you haven’t got a DB pension and I have the wrong person0 -
Bostonerimus1 said:Linton said:hilsea said:Yes a lot of unease across the pond in the bond market. The 30 year treasury hit 5 % this morning.. with this in the USA it’s now spreading to Europe . I’m wondering if china is withdrawing cash from the USA treasury market. So people saying bonds are doing what they are meant to do might be a bit premature. The bonds didn’t really help when we had the pandemic. I’m more concerned about the money market funds, we tend to look at these as holding cash however in these strange times I do worry that these could suddenly become more riskier than than key investor documents indicate .
But, barring the collapse of the $, short term $ bonds and MM funds should not be seriously affected.
There may also be an element of foreign investors pulling out of the US stockmarket. American companies are fearful of selling actively in case they draw Trump's anger. EU shareholders apparently hold 17% of the US market, more than the value of all the EU markets combined. Them withdrawing could account for why the US has been hit harder than most other markets.
American exceptionalism has been hit over the head repeatedly with a blunt instrument in the last few days.0 -
I am wholly reliant on DC pension and savings, so I thought I would look at my main private pension, I haven't subscribed into it since June 2023, as left my employer at that point.
The valuation for December 2023 was approx 463k, today it is currently valued around 481k, so currently back to early 2024,if it stays like that for the next couple of years and then starts edging up again, that would be good enough for me.
About a month ago it was valued at 576kIt's just my opinion and not advice.2 -
I am sitting with fingers crossed as my sons DC pension took a 10% hit between 4th & 8th April.0
-
SouthCoastBoy said:I am wholly reliant on DC pension and savings, so I thought I would look at my main private pension, I haven't subscribed into it since June 2023, as left my employer at that point.
The valuation for December 2023 was approx 463k, today it is currently valued around 481k, so currently back to early 2024,if it stays like that for the next couple of years and then starts edging up again, that would be good enough for me.0 -
I'm 39 so nowhere near retirement. I'm watching with interest but not taking any action at the moment.
I'm hopeful that when I come to retirement age I will have a sufficient pot plus non-pension savings that such volatility won't upset me. So long as it's still a tax-efficient and otherwise sensible option, I will be doing flexible drawdown. By which I mean, taking lower withdrawals (fewer luxuries) when markets are low to avoid crystalising losses any more than necessary.1 -
Nebulous2 said:Some of the clickbait press constantly reference gold-plated DB pensions. They pick their moments for it. We don't hear that so much when the stockmarket has gained 20% in a year.
While there are considerable differences between the two types, including transferring risk from the employer to the employee, what I believe is the biggest difference, for funded schemes, is the amount of money committed.
Lots of people are on the minimum 8% into DC pensions, 5% personal / 3% employer. Many public sector workers are paying more than that themselves, with the employer paying considerably more.
On the other hand I have colleagues who would prefer to sacrifice some of their employed contributions (NHS) to increase take home pay now. They accept reduced pension would result but housing and child care costs are a significant chunk of take home pay as they start out on their career.
I also know of people my wife works with who think their 8% into NEST pension is going to give them a secure retirement starting at the age of 40+. No amount of explaining would get then to voluntarily pay in more.CRV1963- Light bulb moment Sept 15- Planning the great escape- aka retirement!3 -
westv said:SouthCoastBoy said:I am wholly reliant on DC pension and savings, so I thought I would look at my main private pension, I haven't subscribed into it since June 2023, as left my employer at that point.
The valuation for December 2023 was approx 463k, today it is currently valued around 481k, so currently back to early 2024,if it stays like that for the next couple of years and then starts edging up again, that would be good enough for me.
I'm trying to be philosophical about it.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards