UKCPS and Moorside court claim.

Coupon-mad

Mir-kat said:

notice to keeper.

Right at the top of the letter it says "NON POFA" does that mean that there is no keeper liability? And so the PCN is not enforceable since my hubby never told UKCPS who was driving.

So it seems that Moorside lied to the Mediator. What bottom-feeders they are.

Either way, I hope you are both planning on lending your weight to the consumer responses to the Government in the next month, while your case is quiet but looming?

While your case is quiet, we need you:

It's very important that people like you join us to reply to the new Public Consultation, to tell the Government that:

a) you have no faith in POPLA or the IAS and that there must be the SINGLE APPEALS SERVICE that the Parking (Code of Practice) Act 2019 promised the public. As long as it is independent (and only ONE appeals service, not two involved in a race to the bottom) that will give a real option to resolve disputed cases out of court.

b).  THAT THE ENRICHMENT OF 'DEBT RECOVERY FEES' MUST BE COMPLETELY BANNED. DISPUTED CASES ARE NOT SOLVED BY A THIRD PARTY DEMANDING MORE MONEY AND OFFERING A 'PAYMENT PLAN' FOR EXTRA MONEY. THIS SHOULDN'T BE LEGAL.

c). Tell them about your experience and that your case is now at court stage, precisely because (a) and (b) above mean there is no option, no safeguard for consumers EXCEPT to defend court claims. Even though this is DEFINITELY a non-POFA case they carried on and Moorside (you say) lied to the court Mediator about keeper liability.

Responses are invited to the Consultation now:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6617396/parking-code-of-practice-consultation-8-weeks-from-11th-july-2025/p1

Do it in August pleeease! We will discuss it all in more detail in the coming weeks on that thread so do come back in a fortnight.