We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Appeal bc of disability rejected, now letter before court, dispute rejected - now what?
Options
Comments
-
If the CPP NtK is PoFA compliant (and given they are part of the ParkingEye setup, it probably is), there's no advantage to not revealing who the driver was. But mitigating circumstances have never helped anyone.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street1 -
As with all ParkingEye NtKs, a CPP one will not be fully compliant with all the requirements of PoFA as there will be no invitation for the Keeper to pay the charge as per 9(2)(e)(i). There can be no implied obligation.1
-
The signage was bad (there was no machine under the sign, and the actual machine I couldn't see as it was small and hidden by parked cars (it was nowhere near the sign).
Had to use app - and ADHD (registered disability) meant that I made a simple time counting error (classic ADHD issue). I chose the amount I thought was correct - but was 13 minutes out according to their "invoice". So with the ten minute grace period this is a charge for 3 minutes is it not?
1 -
I have photos of the sign and hidden machine. The apps are not difficult to use per se (mostly) - but it is very easy for someone with ADHD to get the details wrong. It's a life constant this!!
Have since found teh machine, and use that now. Have evidence of all the above.0 -
LDast said:As with all ParkingEye NtKs, a CPP one will not be fully compliant with all the requirements of PoFA as there will be no invitation for the Keeper to pay the charge as per 9(2)(e)(i). There can be no implied obligation.
please?
I attach the letter. Thank you.0 -
Coupon-mad said:muddy_gloves said:£100 for 3 minutes over0
-
muddy_gloves said:"The signage was bad (there was no machine under the sign, and the actual machine I couldn't see as it was small and hidden by parked cars (it was nowhere near the sign).
Had to use app - and have ADHD (registered disability) I want to share medical evidence"£100 for 3 minutes over the ten minutes grace.
Paid before leaving for the whole 6 hours parked, within the 6 hours:
DO NOT TALK ABOUT MAKING A MISTAKE.
State that:
- you clearly paid for the full 6 hours the car was parked and due to your medical condition you are legally entitled to more time to process written information such as reading signs and navigating complicated and flaky payment apps.
- the app record shows you paid at 4.39pm and the grace period - minimum ten minutes - allowed to then leave (having returned to the car and paid in good time) was not exceeded.
The PCN has arisen purely because the BPA & IPC Joint CoP cynically changed the 2022 statutory CoP to remove the consideration period on arrival.
That disingenuous change works against all drivers but it especially causes detriment and discrimination against people with protected characteristics such as this motorist. The PCN breaches the Equality Act 2010 and the specific BPA/IPC Joint Code clauses about disabled motorists, and as such the PCN must be cancelled.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
This is so helpful - thank you so much. I'll take out the "mistake" from my letter and add the pieces you have written. Fingers crossed (because I find it utterly ridiculous that I am charged £100 for something I can do nothing about (processing and executive function). I really appreciate your time in writing this - thank you again.
0 -
Sadly my appeal was rejected but I didn't receive notice of that rejection. This means I didn't get the chance to go to POPLA.
I have now received a Letter Before Court.
I used their form to dispute the charge citing, bad signage, being within the ten minutes grace period, and needing extra time for processing because of driver's disability.
They have replied saying that they are "unable to consider any further appeals at this stage", and that the balance remains outstanding. They say they are prepared to take legal action if necessary.
Any idea as to what I should do next?0 -
Wait for them to make a claim.Always remember to abide by Space Corps Directive 39436175880932/B:
'All nations attending the conference are only allocated one parking space.'1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards