[Deleted User] said:Ask the solicitors to explain what s22 Will Act 1837 does not apply: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Will4and1Vict/7/26/section/22 It's quite short and a straightforward read. There's also stuff here that explains in more detail: https://library.croneri.co.uk/cch_uk/ross/22-230ThisIsWeird said:Of course I'm not going to suggest the person involved acts on forum info.GDB2222 said:ThisIsWeird said:Nope. But they seemed pretty certain of their claim.GDB2222 said:These solicitors have seen all the documents, and they have been paid to consider this carefully and advise?ThisIsWeird said:Wooooo.Some solicitors have advised that the current valid - intact - will remains valid, when the subsequent will has been deliberately destroyed by the author.Does anyone on here know for certain?
You can't rely on them, then. You can't rely on this forum, either.
So, are you asking just out of interest, or are you proposing to act on this unreliable information in some way?
But when two separate probate solicitors have since told this person that the original assumed scenario was quite wrong - tearing up a later will does not render an estate intestate if there is a remaining valid will - then I'm back on here to ask if anyone knows the definitive answer with certainty.
That's all.
This person is not in a financial position to pursue this themselves, so would require a NWNF solicitor.
Once you have their answer you can make a decision as to accept it or not.
Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Will has been destroyed.
Comments
-
That’s the same section of the act that I quoted. I would indeed be interested to hear why the solicitors think it doesn’t apply.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
-
ThisIsWeird said:Thank you.It seemingly comes down to the testator's intention, and whether this can be demonstrated.I'll update if there's anything to update
I don’t think you should hold out too much hope at this stage.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
GDB2222 said:ThisIsWeird said:Thank you.It seemingly comes down to the testator's intention, and whether this can be demonstrated.I'll update if there's anything to update
I don’t think you should hold out too much hope at this stage.As I said, it comes down to the intention, and other factors. At the moment, we haven't much of an idea - folk are being cagey - but there is some 'stuff' which could shed light on it.An example: To write a legitimate Will, you need to be of sound mind, yes? And you mustn't be coerced? Well, the same applies if you later destroy a Will; if you were not, at that later tearing-up stage, of sound mind, or were coerced into doing so, the Will still stands.Ditto with intent - if it can be shown that the testator changed their mind about the new Will, and wished the old one to stand, then ditto.If the testator tore up the Will because they filled it out incorrectly, then it was never valid - so the previous one stands.So, as far as I can see, the answer to the Q, "Does tearing up a Will make the estate intestate, or does it even revert to a previous will?", is, "it depends".
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179.1K Life & Family
- 264K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
