PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Complicated stamp duty question - becoming liable for more stamp duty if getting married

Hi all,

Complicated one for you. I will get proper advice from a solicitor, but thought I'd start here!

I have owned a house with my now ex-wife since 2014 and will do for at least another ten years. It's where my child lives and have no intention of disrupting them even if I could.

In 2024 my partner bought a house which I live in with her, and I pay half of the mortgage on it via JBSP mortgage. Doing it this way meant we could take advantage of first time buyer stamp duty and avoid the 'second property' premium. A significant saving (~£30k).

When we did this, we went into it knowing that there would be stamp duty implications if we were to marry at any point. I believe it was that I'd be liable for stamp duty (inc additional second property %) on the whole property if we got married, but that if we added me to the deeds/mortgage in advance of marriage, then I'd only pay that stamp duty + second property premium on half of the outstanding mortgage value.

Has anyone got any experience of this?

Thanks!


Comments

  • HaveIt
    HaveIt Posts: 27 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    Maybe it's not that complicated. SDLT guidance below. I guess I'd just need to factor in the second home penalty onto the chargeable consideration?

    An example of when you pay Stamp Duty Land Tax when no money changes hands

    The owner of a property valued at £700,000, with an outstanding mortgage of £600,000, transfers half the property to their partner when they marry in October 2022. Their partner takes on 50% of the mortgage (£300,000).

    HMRC charge Stamp Duty Land Tax on the amount paid for a property or the amount of ‘chargeable consideration’ given.

    By taking liability for the mortgage, the owner’s partner has given ‘chargeable consideration’ of £300,000 for their share of the property, which is £2,500 Stamp Duty Land Tax (0% of £250,000 + 5% of £50,000).

  • Bookworm105
    Bookworm105 Posts: 2,016 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 25 February at 12:50PM
    HaveIt said:
    Maybe it's not that complicated. SDLT guidance below. I guess I'd just need to factor in the second home penalty onto the chargeable consideration?
    how did you escape higher rate SDLT in the first place?
    With a JBSP mortgage in play have you given written confirmation that you will not get any money back when the property is sold ie in tax terms you have no beneficial interest?
    Joint Mortgage Sole Proprietor Stamp Duty | SAM Conveyanicng

    it is the acquisition of a beneficial interest that triggers SDLT, and in your case that means being added to the deeds and you no longer waiving your claim to a share of the property. That fact has nothing to do with whether you are married or not at the time of the addition, you are a cohabiting couple, one of whom owns another property. That other property is not your main home, is being retained by you, and thus the home you now live in is an "additional" property that you now own, so attracts the higher rate.
  • HaveIt
    HaveIt Posts: 27 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    Escaped SDLT by not being on the deeds. I'm a guarantor only with no ownership rights nor even a legal right to live in the property. But I believe as soon as we're married, I gain a beneficial interest. I suppose I'm just wondering if there's any benefit to transferring ownership before marriage but it doesn't appear to be the case.

    They really need to update the stamp duty laws to reflect the complexities of divorce and family homes as opposed to holiday homes and BTLs.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,837 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    HaveIt said:
    Hi all,

    Complicated one for you. I will get proper advice from a solicitor, but thought I'd start here!

    I have owned a house with my now ex-wife since 2014 and will do for at least another ten years. It's where my child lives and have no intention of disrupting them even if I could.

    In 2024 my partner bought a house which I live in with her, and I pay half of the mortgage on it via JBSP mortgage. Doing it this way meant we could take advantage of first time buyer stamp duty and avoid the 'second property' premium. A significant saving (~£30k).

    When we did this, we went into it knowing that there would be stamp duty implications if we were to marry at any point. I believe it was that I'd be liable for stamp duty (inc additional second property %) on the whole property if we got married, but that if we added me to the deeds/mortgage in advance of marriage, then I'd only pay that stamp duty + second property premium on half of the outstanding mortgage value.

    Has anyone got any experience of this?

    Thanks!


    Am I right in thinking that the property is in England, so the relevant stamp duty is stamp duty land tax?

    Some good points have been made in earlier replies.  Here is another point.

    Perhaps the "additional property" surcharge for SDLT is not a problem because of the nature of your ownership of the house owned with your ex-wife.  It sounds as if that might be subject to a "property adjustment order".  If so, it does not "count against you" for surcharge purposes.  There is guidance about it here: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm09797
  • HaveIt
    HaveIt Posts: 27 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    SDLT_Geek said:
    HaveIt said:
    Hi all,

    Complicated one for you. I will get proper advice from a solicitor, but thought I'd start here!

    I have owned a house with my now ex-wife since 2014 and will do for at least another ten years. It's where my child lives and have no intention of disrupting them even if I could.

    In 2024 my partner bought a house which I live in with her, and I pay half of the mortgage on it via JBSP mortgage. Doing it this way meant we could take advantage of first time buyer stamp duty and avoid the 'second property' premium. A significant saving (~£30k).

    When we did this, we went into it knowing that there would be stamp duty implications if we were to marry at any point. I believe it was that I'd be liable for stamp duty (inc additional second property %) on the whole property if we got married, but that if we added me to the deeds/mortgage in advance of marriage, then I'd only pay that stamp duty + second property premium on half of the outstanding mortgage value.

    Has anyone got any experience of this?

    Thanks!


    Am I right in thinking that the property is in England, so the relevant stamp duty is stamp duty land tax?

    Some good points have been made in earlier replies.  Here is another point.

    Perhaps the "additional property" surcharge for SDLT is not a problem because of the nature of your ownership of the house owned with your ex-wife.  It sounds as if that might be subject to a "property adjustment order".  If so, it does not "count against you" for surcharge purposes.  There is guidance about it here: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm09797
    Oh wow! Thank you. This could be an absolute gamechanger. Yes, there's a 'Mesher' order in the divorce that means my ex-wife can live there for another 10 years (at least) so I will check but I believe that would help.

    Really appreciate your help.
  • HaveIt
    HaveIt Posts: 27 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    I've checked, and yes!!! That order means I'm not subject to the higher SDLT fee which means £15,615 comes down to just £1,560!!! Incredible! Thank you.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,837 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    HaveIt said:
    I've checked, and yes!!! That order means I'm not subject to the higher SDLT fee which means £15,615 comes down to just £1,560!!! Incredible! Thank you.
    Great news.
  • Really helpful thread of information on stamp duty- thank you
  • I totally agree!
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.