PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Nasty letter from freeholder of retirement housing

12346

Comments

  • waribai
    waribai Posts: 157 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker



    (And/or it's also possible that if this results from another leaseholder's complaint, that leaseholder is indemnifying the freeholder's legal costs - which might make legal action less likely - which might be good for the OP.)


    Thanks for the reply. Can you just clarify the last part above in layman's terms? Thank you!
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,049 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 26 February at 4:30PM
    waribai said:



    (And/or it's also possible that if this results from another leaseholder's complaint, that leaseholder is indemnifying the freeholder's legal costs - which might make legal action less likely - which might be good for the OP.)


    Thanks for the reply. Can you just clarify the last part above in layman's terms? Thank you!

    Typically, all the leases for all the flats in the block will be identical.

    Typically, a lease will have to following covenant by the freeholder (in simplified terms)...
    • If leaseholder B complains to the Freeholder that Leaseholder A  is breaching the lease, the Freeholder promises that they will take enforcement action against Leaseholder A, to stop the breach.
    • But if it turns out that the Freeholder can't get their legal costs back any other way - Leaseholder B has to cover the Freeholder's legal costs

    in even simpler terms...
    • The freeholder would be saying to Leaseholder B "Based on your complaint, we're happy to take Leaseholder A to court for breaching their lease, but if we lose, and we can't get our legal costs back any other way - you'll have to pay our legal costs"

    That risk might be enough to make Leaseholder B withdraw the complaint about Leaseholder A.

  • Flugelhorn
    Flugelhorn Posts: 7,354 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    eddddy said:

    • If leaseholder A complains to the Freeholder that Leaseholder B is breaching the lease, the Freeholder promises that they will take enforcement action against Leaseholder A, to stop the breach.


    do you mean Leaseholder B complains to the freeholder that Leaseholder A is breaching the Lease?
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,049 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    eddddy said:

    • If leaseholder A complains to the Freeholder that Leaseholder B is breaching the lease, the Freeholder promises that they will take enforcement action against Leaseholder A, to stop the breach.


    do you mean Leaseholder B complains to the freeholder that Leaseholder A is breaching the Lease?

    Yep - I think so. I've corrected the post.
  • waribai
    waribai Posts: 157 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ok. I think I've understood it. Thanks. My guess is that they would rather make a fast buck with her moving out and any associated fees, resell etc. 
  • NameUnavailable
    NameUnavailable Posts: 3,030 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    May it be that the solicitor acting for the purchaser raised a query about the age issue during the purchase and it was agreed that the sale could continue?

    Otherwise surely the management company are at fault here for not doing their due dilligence during the sale of the flat? (although in theory they may have thought the purchaser was buying for someone else to live there).

    If there is a problem then one of the solicitors must surely be at fault here and a professional indemnity claim needs to be made!
  • Flugelhorn
    Flugelhorn Posts: 7,354 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Has your friend managed to speak to her solicitor yet or got any advice @waribai ?
  • ThisIsWeird
    ThisIsWeird Posts: 7,935 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 4 March at 10:54AM
    waribai said:
    Thanks for all the advice. Yes. She is still waiting for contact from the purchasing solicitor. We are though in the meantime contacting a leasehold specialist solicitor for some pro bono independent advice (recommended by a parliamentary campaigner on leasehold). My strong suspicion is that the freeholder is hoping for her to panic and ask for their assistance. They would then advise her to put it on the market. They will then come to the 'rescue' with a very low offer to ameliorate the situation. Once she has moved out they will then sell it an increased price on the open market or possibly rent it out. Who knows?
    I am hoping that as they are a slightly dodgy outfit anyway, they will be averse to trying to go down the legal route especially if she communicates with them via legal channels only and makes it clear that it is not her living there that is in breach of the terms but the transfer that was a breach.
    I think it's best to keep your suspicions separate, at least until you know more; certainly not let it colour the issue in any way until then.
    It is just as likely that the FH/ManCo is simply spineless and incompetent, and are reacting in a volatile and clumsy manner to their late realisation of this breach, or possibly to a complaint by another Leaseholder; they worry that they can be held liable for this seeming error, so are all guns blazing to try and intimidate and coerce your friend into selling, and hence resolving the issue for them. And, it's kind of working - your friend is understandably very concerned, even tho' legal professionals - on both sides - should have ensured this couldn't have occurred (and, I'd suggest, would be liable for any losses if it progresses). But that is pure assumption too.
    For the FH to suggest, in writing, that this seeming breach is 'unlawful', sets their incompetent tone, and I suspect won't serve them well should this matter progress; it comes across to me as intentionally coercive, especially as it's inaccurate. Crude and incompetent at best.
    I don't blame your friend for seeking specialist advice, but really this should be landed squarely on her conveyancing solicitor's lap in the first instance. I know they are on holiday, but don't let her worry about timings - they will (should) sort this on their return.
    Can you confirm - does she have LegProt? This could be important if more specialist advice is required.
    Meanwhile, ask her to gather and go through all the documents regarding the purchase, and that includes the sales particulars. If she was informed by the Estate Agent, for example, that this was 'for the over-60s', then the EA was presumably given that info from someone, and didn't just make it up. So where did that info come from? The vendor? 
    She should also have the Sellers' Pack -TA6; should this include info on what is a (very) significant and restrictive covenant? (No idea).
    It's interesting that there is seemingly no insistence that the occupants are actually 'retired', but only above a certain age? In which case, the fact she still goes off to work shouldn't be an issue? I'd have thought being 'retired' rather than 'of a certain age' would be the more significant matter to other residents?!
    Is there a nuclear option of her making a complaint about all the other young folk in this block; "are you going to apply the same conditions to them, or are you discriminating against me 'cos I is working?"

    Mil moved into a retirement village around 2 years ago, and the entry process was pretty comprehensive, including a 'cognition' interview, and checks on her physical capacity - and, yes, age. Interestingly, they have since lowered the min age requirement down to, I think, 55 or 60, in order to attract more folk, so the ManCo clearly has that right (tho' it initially applied to some new builds). Sadly, the house she bought had to be vacated by the bereaved partner of the previous owner, as he was - then - too young to qualify.




  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,918 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 10 March at 8:46PM
    If it was on rightmove, then you should be able to recover the original listing from https://www.rightmove.co.uk/house-prices.html
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.