We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Amazon ofm falsely accusing me of violating their policies and restricted account after 2 months
Comments
-
moef_17 said:
i have never returned or refunded anything on amazon in my life. ive sent them reciepts and folders to prove thismoef_17 said:
If a company holds my money, they must return it. Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, a service provider cannot withhold a consumer’s funds indefinitely without cause. Since Amazon has prevented me from spending my £50 balance, they need to process a refund. That’s not up for debate.3 -
eskbanker said:moef_17 said:
i have never returned or refunded anything on amazon in my life. ive sent them reciepts and folders to prove thisJenni x1 -
Jenni_D said:eskbanker said:moef_17 said:
i have never returned or refunded anything on amazon in my life. ive sent them reciepts and folders to prove this1 -
eskbanker said:moef_17 said:
i have never returned or refunded anything on amazon in my life. ive sent them reciepts and folders to prove thismoef_17 said:
If a company holds my money, they must return it. Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, a service provider cannot withhold a consumer’s funds indefinitely without cause. Since Amazon has prevented me from spending my £50 balance, they need to process a refund. That’s not up for debate.0 -
Jenni_D said:eskbanker said:moef_17 said:
i have never returned or refunded anything on amazon in my life. ive sent them reciepts and folders to prove this
1 -
eskbanker said:Jenni_D said:eskbanker said:moef_17 said:
i have never returned or refunded anything on amazon in my life. ive sent them reciepts and folders to prove thisthe receipts and folders I provided contain evidence that my account was wrongly restricted from purchasing physical goods. My account isn’t locked—I can still buy digital products—but Amazon has placed an unjust restriction without giving a valid reason. Despite repeated requests, they have failed to address the evidence I’ve submitted, including legal identification and transaction history proving my purchases were legitimate.
This restriction raises concerns under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015), which states that services must be provided with reasonable care and skill. Amazon’s failure to provide a clear justification or review my case properly could be seen as unfair treatment.
Additionally, under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPRs), misleading actions and omissions that cause financial harm are prohibited. Amazon restricting my ability to use my legally purchased gift card without proper justification or transparency could be seen as an unfair commercial practice.
Furthermore, if Amazon is storing my personal information related to this restriction without providing clear reasoning or responding to my data access requests, they may also be breaching my rights under the UK GDPR, which requires businesses to process data fairly and transparently.
I also have £50 in gift card balance that I cannot use as intended. Since gift cards are considered pre-paid monetary instruments, refusing to honor them for no valid reason could also raise concerns under unfair contract terms. Amazon has yet to offer any solution for this
0 -
eskbanker said:moef_17 said:
i have never returned or refunded anything on amazon in my life. ive sent them reciepts and folders to prove thismoef_17 said:
If a company holds my money, they must return it. Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, a service provider cannot withhold a consumer’s funds indefinitely without cause. Since Amazon has prevented me from spending my £50 balance, they need to process a refund. That’s not up for debate.I appreciate your response, but the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015), Section 49, states that services must be performed with reasonable care and skill. Amazon restricting my account without justification, despite my attempts to provide legitimate evidence, could be seen as a failure to meet this standard.
Additionally, the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPRs), Regulation 3, prohibits unfair commercial practices that distort consumer decision-making. Amazon sold me (or rather, my dad) a gift card with the understanding it could be used for purchases. Refusing to honor it without valid reasoning could be classified as a misleading omission under Regulation 6 if they fail to provide key information affecting my ability to use the balance.
While I agree that citing too much legislation can dilute the argument, these two laws are directly relevant. My main concern is that Amazon has not only restricted my purchases unfairly but also refuses to acknowledge the money I already have in my account.
0 -
I think it's time you took them to court. You clearly believe they've flouted various bits of legislation and no amount of opinion from others here is going to convince you otherwise.
10 -
MattMattMattUK said:
You have no right to "clarity", there is no "proper process".
If the account closure is a result of data processing decisions (which it clearly must be in this case) GDPR is clear that the company must provide details, either voluntarily or as a result of a pertinent customer enquiry. This right to be informed is in addition to the right to access. Indeed, if the closure was a result of solely automated decisions, then the customer has even more rights, and is entitled not just to an explanation, but also to a human review and a right of appeal.0 -
moef_17 said:eskbanker said:Jenni_D said:eskbanker said:moef_17 said:
i have never returned or refunded anything on amazon in my life. ive sent them reciepts and folders to prove thisthe receipts and folders I provided contain evidence that my account was wrongly restricted from purchasing physical goods. My account isn’t locked—I can still buy digital products—but Amazon has placed an unjust restriction without giving a valid reason. Despite repeated requests, they have failed to address the evidence I’ve submitted, including legal identification and transaction history proving my purchases were legitimate.
This restriction raises concerns under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015), which states that services must be provided with reasonable care and skill. Amazon’s failure to provide a clear justification or review my case properly could be seen as unfair treatment.
Additionally, under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPRs), misleading actions and omissions that cause financial harm are prohibited. Amazon restricting my ability to use my legally purchased gift card without proper justification or transparency could be seen as an unfair commercial practice.
Furthermore, if Amazon is storing my personal information related to this restriction without providing clear reasoning or responding to my data access requests, they may also be breaching my rights under the UK GDPR, which requires businesses to process data fairly and transparently.
I also have £50 in gift card balance that I cannot use as intended. Since gift cards are considered pre-paid monetary instruments, refusing to honor them for no valid reason could also raise concerns under unfair contract terms. Amazon has yet to offer any solution for this
You're picking random pieces of legislation that don't apply. Take s49 CRA you posted:Every contract to supply a service is to be treated as including a term that the trader must perform the service with reasonable care and skill.You don't have a contract with Amazon to supply you a service, so this doesn't apply.
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards