📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Damaged coat

Options
Recently I visited a local store and my coat got caught on a metal rod hanging from a sweet display. The coat has torn and I have raised a complaint with the store. They've watched the CCTV footage, have the photographs I took and have my proof of purchase. They've agreed to reimburse me the cost of the coat but are now asking for the coat to be sent to them before they send payment. I have questioned why they need the coat as well and they have stated for 'auditing purposes'.

I just want to know if this is right as I feel they are inconveniencing me further...
«1

Comments

  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,128 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Recently I visited a local store and my coat got caught on a metal rod hanging from a sweet display. The coat has torn and I have raised a complaint with the store. They've watched the CCTV footage, have the photographs I took and have my proof of purchase. They've agreed to reimburse me the cost of the coat but are now asking for the coat to be sent to them before they send payment. I have questioned why they need the coat as well and they have stated for 'auditing purposes'.

    I just want to know if this is right as I feel they are inconveniencing me further...
    Do you want them to reimburse you or not? If you do then if they want to see a damaged coat to inspect it properly that is their prerogative.

    They are probably wanting to make sure there isn’t any deliberate damage.

    If it’s a local store it’s not going be a huge inconvenience to drop it in in passing is it?
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 30 January at 2:35PM
    Seems ok to me. They might be obliged to check for fraud.
    Evri do parcels for £3.20 if it's inconvenient to visit.
  • lisyloo said:

    Evri do parcels for £3.20 if it's inconvenient to visit.
    Would do RM Tracked 48 (if less than £150) with free collection/PO drop off for the extra 19 pence :) 

    https://send.royalmail.com/send/youritem?country=GBR&format&weight=&weightUnit=G

    Yes OP I guess if they are paying for the coat they can ask to have it :) 
    In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces
  • They can see from the cctv footage what happened, and have asked for it to be posted to an office, not handed in at the store. Would have been easier to do it that way! Thanks for sharing your thoughts, it's good to hear others opinions
  • screech_78
    screech_78 Posts: 622 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    They are reimbursing you for the coat, so therefore it now belongs to them. 

    Unless the coat was purchased brand new that day, you’re not even entitled to the full cost of it back. 

    I’d do what they ask before they change their mind. 
  • ButterCheese
    ButterCheese Posts: 589 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Unless the coat was purchased brand new that day, you’re not even entitled to the full cost of it back. 
    I think they are.  It's the cost of replacing it, not it's second hand value.  Otherwsie you'd have to try and find the same coat of the same age in the same condition on sale somewhere; the research into which would cost more than the coat unless it's a Prada Versace Ultra Gold Rare Edition

  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,128 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Unfortunately, people do try it on shops In any number of different ways so the retailers do tend to want to doublecheck everything when it comes to paying out, for obvious reasons. 
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • LightFlare
    LightFlare Posts: 1,469 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 30 January at 2:35PM
    Unless the coat was purchased brand new that day, you’re not even entitled to the full cost of it back. 
    I think they are.  It's the cost of replacing it, not it's second hand value.  Otherwsie you'd have to try and find the same coat of the same age in the same condition on sale somewhere; the research into which would cost more than the coat unless it's a Prada Versace Ultra Gold Rare Edition

    That would be betterment which isn't "allowed"

    Unless you have a policy that specifies new for old
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.