PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Ground rent and service charge.

Sorry if this seems like a silly question but my partner bought my flat from me recently and a property developer has bought the flat upstairs and the freehold. There are two flats in total in the building. 

I extended the lease about 7 years ago and the ground rent was peppercorned. There is no service charge. 

Can the new freeholder decided to charge service charge and ground rent? Does my partner have a right to a share of the freehold? 

Comments

  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,597 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The freehold has been purchased already so there is no right to buy a share.
    The Ground rent and Service Charge provisions are outlined in the Lease.  
    If the rent has been peppercorned at renewal then that cannot be changed.  There will be provissions in the Lease as to what contributions need to be made for maintenance etc and these will amount to a service charge.  The developer cannot charge for items beyond what is already specified in the Lease.
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 17,802 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 28 January at 7:07PM

    Can the new freeholder decided to charge service charge...

    Service Charges work like this...

    It's very likely that your partner's lease is structured as follows (because most leases are)...
    • The freeholder must insure the building, and also maintain and repair the building (and maybe the garden)
    • The freeholder has to pay all those bills, and your partner has to pay the freeholder 50% of those bills (and the other flat owner has to pay the other 50%)
    • That 50% that your partner has to pay is called their Service Charge 

    The freeholder can (probably) collect the Service Charge in 2 ways...
    • 1) Each time there is a bill (e.g. for buildings insurance, or for repairing the guttering, etc), the Freeholder can ask your partner to pay 50% of the bill
    • 2) The freeholder can estimate all the costs for the whole year (insurance, gutter repairs, etc), and ask your partner to pay 50% of that estimated amount at the beginning of the year. Then it will be adjusted at the end of the year - if the actual bills turn out to be higher or lower than the estimate

    I'm guessing that the old freeholder did option 1. The new freeholder might stick with option 1, or might switch to option 2.


    ... and ground rent?

    The new freeholder cannot change the ground rent.



    Does my partner have a right to a share of the freehold? 

    That depends on a number of factors - but I'm guessing probably not.


    When the freehold of a building containing 2 or more flats is sold - the leaseholders (flat owners) usually get the right of first refusal to buy the freehold.

    But the Right of First Refusal doesn't apply to...

    ...resident landlords who live in the building where the following two conditions apply:
    • the building is not a purpose-built block of flats, that is, it must be a property, a house for example, which has been converted into flats since its original construction; and
    • the landlord genuinely lives in the building as his only or principal residence and has done so for more than 12 months.
    Link: https://www.lease-advice.org/advice-guide/right-first-refusal/

    So I suspect you had a resident landlord.

    But even if the Right of First Refusal did apply, both leaseholders (flat owners) would need to cooperate to jointly buy the freehold. And in this case, I imagine the owner of the other flat wouldn't cooperate.



Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.