PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House with ransom shared access

Options
2»

Comments

  • BikingBud
    BikingBud Posts: 2,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The real distinction would be the right they have: "to pass and repass by foot" or "to pass and repass by foot and motor vehicle" Option 1 is a reasonably small footpath that might run alongside your future garage, option 2 might be to allow them to build a garage or possibly another dwelling in their back garden.

    Also I would not assume the neighbour will never need it as although they might currently be using access via the other side, plans for extension and such like on that access might cause them to revert to accessing their rear garden via this right of way.

    We hear of people extending and then having difficulty doing rear garden stuff, even emptying bins.
  • Pat38493
    Pat38493 Posts: 3,339 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    BikingBud said:
    The real distinction would be the right they have: "to pass and repass by foot" or "to pass and repass by foot and motor vehicle" Option 1 is a reasonably small footpath that might run alongside your future garage, option 2 might be to allow them to build a garage or possibly another dwelling in their back garden.

    Also I would not assume the neighbour will never need it as although they might currently be using access via the other side, plans for extension and such like on that access might cause them to revert to accessing their rear garden via this right of way.

    We hear of people extending and then having difficulty doing rear garden stuff, even emptying bins.
    Thanks good points and we will be checking that.

    If you saw the situation in real life, I think it's hard to imagine anything they would want to do that would force them to require that access again, but theoretically I take your point.
  • NameUnavailable
    NameUnavailable Posts: 3,030 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    If this driveway has a right of way for the neighbour you may not be entitled to park vehicles on it. Check exactly what the details are!
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 22,600 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    If you cannot park on the drive and ,presently , there is no available option to use it for access to a garage on your own land , what is the point of the  drive being your land?
  • Pat38493
    Pat38493 Posts: 3,339 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 29 January at 10:43AM
    sheramber said:
    If you cannot park on the drive and ,presently , there is no available option to use it for access to a garage on your own land , what is the point of the  drive being your land?
    This is to be determined when I get the deeds.  The current owner has recently planted grass across part of the access, and a gate has been installed (but was left open when we were there), plus another (vehicle) gate has been installed at the border of the neighbour's land.  Therefore you could still park there but would have to move if the neighbour asked in theory, plus if the neighbour suddenly decided to use that regularly, the grass would get chewed up.  Meantime the grass is still part of the garden of that house.

    As stated above though it's very hard to see how the neighbour would gain anything from using the access, and hard to imagine what changes they could make on their side that would render the access useful to them, unless they knock down their house and outbuildings and rebuild it blocking off the existing other access (which would make no sense for various reasons).
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.