We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
IPC discussion topics - a place to share and air your views
Options
Comments
-
I've always wondered whether a well crafted complaint to the ICO after a data erasure request is refused by an operator is an avenue.
This would be after debt collector nonsense has been and gone and the operator has done nothing for say a year and maybe the appellant has invited the operator multiple times to initiate court proceedings and fully denied the debt.
I don't see how it is reasonable to hold onto data that over time will exponentially increase in the risk of being incorrect when many operators have no intent to deal with it expeditiously and some have zero intent of ever initiating a court claim.
It's mad to have such an arbitrary retention period of data linked solely to the limitation period and in some cases operators hold on to it for longer.
7
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards