IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).

Charging for Blue Badge Spaces - general thoughts...

Many private car parks now charge for Blue Badge Holder [BBH] spaces. 

I think they do this for two reasons - firstly the little parking income, but secondly the parking scumcos don't have anyone on site checking the badges so they would have no way of knowing who qualifies for free parking and who doesn't since they only read number plates with cameras. So really its for ease of remote management and increased PCN income.

What challenges have there been to charging for BBH spaces?

Do the freeholders have an obligation to 'make reasonable adjustments for BBHs' ie provide the spaces in the first place? 

Is it 'a reasonable adjustment' to charge for these spaces?

Has anyone looked at what the planning permission said for the car parks wrt  an obligation to provide of 'free BHH spaces'? [Councils like to put conditions in like just that...]




Comments

  • caprikid1
    caprikid1 Posts: 2,413 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    "Is it 'a reasonable adjustment' to charge for these spaces?"

    Struggling to understand why they should get them for free, the reasonable adjustment is provisioning the space. 

    There is probably no shortage of equally deserving people in our society for free parking. Also it has to remembered that 3 disabled spaces probably take up the equivalent of 5 normal spaces, free train travel ? Free Airfares ? 
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,640 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I agree, providing the spaces is the adjustment. Some places go above and beyond because they recognise there is a higher cost to be disabled, but on the other hand there are extra benefits to support that with regards to mobility and it’s not unreasonable to expect those to be used.
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Many private car parks now charge for Blue Badge Holder [BBH] spaces. 

    I think they do this for two reasons - firstly the little parking income, but secondly the parking scumcos don't have anyone on site checking the badges so they would have no way of knowing who qualifies for free parking and who doesn't since they only read number plates with cameras. So really its for ease of remote management and increased PCN income.

    What challenges have there been to charging for BBH spaces?

    Do the freeholders have an obligation to 'make reasonable adjustments for BBHs' ie provide the spaces in the first place? 

    Is it 'a reasonable adjustment' to charge for these spaces?

    Has anyone looked at what the planning permission said for the car parks wrt  an obligation to provide of 'free BHH spaces'? [Councils like to put conditions in like just that...]





    Reading the number plate gives no indication whether anyone in the car has a blue badge so do they not need someone to check?

    As blue badges have no legal standing in private car parks then trying to make them a condition of parking in a "disabled" space could be a breach of the Equality Act.

    If companies want to charge for spaces then fair enough.
    Things that are differerent: draw & drawer, brought & bought, loose & lose, dose & does, payed & paid


  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 7,036 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Councils also charge, so I fail to see what the arguments are 

    The real argument regarding the BB spaces is about reasonable adjustments 

    Councils may provide an Extra hour free, so 60 minutes consideration period and grace period combined, private car parks don't at the moment, the argument could be said to be that the BB holder needs more time to unload and load themselves, hence the Extra 60 minutes, because they paid for the actual parking time, whereas able bodied people may need only 10 minutes either side of the paid for time , making 20 minutes for consideration time plus grace period time 

    So a bit like the Jopson case, loading and unloading is not parking ( same for deliveries or taxis , its stopping not parking, so the extra time is what should be considered here, not the charge itself. )

    Parking bays are too small in this country, as a recent study confirmed, so bigger bays should be universal, nothing to do with the BB question. I know from experience that NCP blue badge bays are not long enough to allow a BMW X1 to fit inside the lines 
  • caprikid1
    caprikid1 Posts: 2,413 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    "Parking bays are too small in this country, as a recent study confirmed, so bigger bays should be universal, nothing to do with the BB question. I know from experience that NCP blue badge bays are not long enough to allow a BMW X1 to fit inside the lines "

    Parking bays are not too small, cars have grown too big. 

    Driving older cars once considered the norm its safe to say that it is the cars that have grown to exceed the standard spaces.

    Compare a 1975 Golf and a 2024 Golf ? a 1976 VW Polo and a 2024 Polo.

    I would go as far as to say a 2024 Polo is probably as big if not bigger than a 1975 Golf.

    Whilst we can increase the size of our spaces in car parks we cannot easily increase the size of our country lanes.
  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 7,036 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Its irrelevant to the current problem and the recent study recommended that bays increase in size, not that cars should be shrunk or go back to the size of an Austin Mini 

    The fact that our roads and streets were once narrow cart tracks is no argument either, the cart tracks didnt cater for modern 52 seater coaches or articulated lorries etc

    It's called progress , you adapt to suit the modern world, some things like computer's get smaller, vehicles get bigger, unless you buy a Smart car. ( My neighbour hitches his tiny Smart car to the back of his huge camper van, so wouldn't fit in any parking spaces, with or without the car on the back. )
  • caprikid1
    caprikid1 Posts: 2,413 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 3 December 2024 at 3:27PM
    "Its irrelevant to the current problem"

    Not really the increasing size of cars manifests itself in many ways.

    1. No longer fit into standard garages :- Most garages are tied to plot size.
    2. Cars parked on roads cause both congestion and a danger to pedestrians.
    3. Larger vehicles are more of a risk in country lanes.

    and so on...

    Is it progress ? Larger heavier cars, damaging our roads, damaging property etc....

    Given the way the government taxes larger cars I don't see that it's seen as progress environmentally either.

    Fact of the matter is we have an infrastructure built around a certain size of car / cart and that won't mystically change due to globalisation of car size.

    I am not saying we should go back to driving Mini's, far too much fun for many on here !, but merely pointing out that car spaces used to be perfectly adequate, even 20 years ago.
  • Half_way
    Half_way Posts: 7,430 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If people buy cars that are bigger/wider then in my opinion thats their choice and with that choice you will have to accept any consequences ( ie vehicle to large to fit in garage/parking space etc)

    As for Disabled bays/parking etc, my base understanding is that service providers have to make adjustments for those with disabilities.
     There is nothing wrong with charging disabled people to use a service - as long as ( as with everything) this is made clear as some councils offer free disabled parking on council car parks.

    Some adjustments could be things such as disabled bays/areas with more space - not for larger vehicles but due to the simple fact a disabled person needs this extra room  - even more so if they have walking/mobility aids to sort out.
    In some cases its not practical to offer a specific disabled area, or disabled bays, or the area for such may be smaller than the demand in those cases I have directed cars to park in suitable areas as the reasonable adjustment if using a field at a country event, or in the rare case of a marked car park to park across as many marked bays as required.

    As for time limits then if you pay £1.50 for two hours parking, then extending this by 30 minutes on each hour  for disabled people would be a reasonable adjustment, likewise for ANPR tie controlled car parks, if a passenger is disabled then the vehicle should be allowed extra time for standard short term/part day parking

     If the ANPR system can not automatically identify vehicles with passengers who are disabled  aka have a protected characteristic without them having to jump through extra hoops such as registering their vehicle, then the ANPR system should not be used
    From the Plain Language Commission:

    "The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.