PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Buying a flat with the original lease missing
mimi111
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hello,
I am 4 months into buying a flat and I've just been told that the original lease documents are missing (supposedly one from 1958 and one from 1980). We have all of the subsequent deeds of variations.
The seller has offered indemnity insurance to cover losses (minus 'adverse interest'?).
If we go ahead, I'd like to surrender the lease and regrant a new one, but I have no idea the cost or whether the other share of freeholders would be open to it.
My solicitor isn't providing any advice and I have had very mixed reviews from family friends. How common is a missing lease and how bad an idea is it to proceed?
I am 4 months into buying a flat and I've just been told that the original lease documents are missing (supposedly one from 1958 and one from 1980). We have all of the subsequent deeds of variations.
The seller has offered indemnity insurance to cover losses (minus 'adverse interest'?).
If we go ahead, I'd like to surrender the lease and regrant a new one, but I have no idea the cost or whether the other share of freeholders would be open to it.
My solicitor isn't providing any advice and I have had very mixed reviews from family friends. How common is a missing lease and how bad an idea is it to proceed?
0
Comments
-
Faced this exact same problem when buying my flat. Answer was for solicitor to get cast iron guarantee of a new lease and how much it would cost (surrender and regrant) and for the vendor to make an allowance on the purchase price to cover the cost. The leases in the building were pretty standard so creating a new one for my flat was pretty much a cut and paste job.I was a cash buyer. I’m not sure if this arrangement would have worked if a mortgage were required, or if the leases for neighbouring flats were not standardised.1
-
You are buying a defective product. You either need to be getting it at a bargain price, say 25% off, in which case it is up to you to sort out the issues. Or, if you are paying full price, the seller needs to sort out the issues, in which case Boudicca's solution sounds pretty good.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?1
-
bouicca21 said:Faced this exact same problem when buying my flat. Answer was for solicitor to get cast iron guarantee of a new lease and how much it would cost (surrender and regrant) and for the vendor to make an allowance on the purchase price to cover the cost. The leases in the building were pretty standard so creating a new one for my flat was pretty much a cut and paste job.I was a cash buyer. I’m not sure if this arrangement would have worked if a mortgage were required, or if the leases for neighbouring flats were not standardised.0
-
None of the other leaseholders were involved and I don’t understand why they would need to be. Ask your solicitor for an explanation.With hindsight I wish I’d been more hard nosed about the whole,thing and driven the price down. After all the chances of the vendor finding another buyer were pretty slim.2
-
bouicca21 said:None of the other leaseholders were involved and I don’t understand why they would need to be. Ask your solicitor for an explanation.With hindsight I wish I’d been more hard nosed about the whole,thing and driven the price down. After all the chances of the vendor finding another buyer were pretty slim.0
-
mimi111 said:bouicca21 said:None of the other leaseholders were involved and I don’t understand why they would need to be. Ask your solicitor for an explanation.With hindsight I wish I’d been more hard nosed about the whole,thing and driven the price down. After all the chances of the vendor finding another buyer were pretty slim.
Or, buy a different flat!No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
It should not be necessary for the other leases to be regranted unless you are asking for the terms to be varied. Assuming all of the lesses are meant to be the same, do the other leaseholders have a copy of their original lease from which a new lease could be drafted?0
-
mimi111 said:bouicca21 said:None of the other leaseholders were involved and I don’t understand why they would need to be. Ask your solicitor for an explanation.With hindsight I wish I’d been more hard nosed about the whole,thing and driven the price down. After all the chances of the vendor finding another buyer were pretty slim.
0 -
You mention "share of freehold" and 4 owners, so it sounds like there are 4 people jointly owning the freehold - so all 4 would need to agree and cooperate with the re-grant.
One slightly contentious issue might be that a re-granted lease will probably have to have zero ground rent - because of a change in the law. And it would be sensible to make the lease 999 years.
It's a bit of a wild guess, but could the issue be that, if you get a new lease with zero ground rent and 999 years, the other 3 people want the same, for fairness?
(It may be that ground rent isn't collected, but if it's still mentioned in the lease and is onerous, it could cause problems with mortgaging / remortgaging. The same if the length of the lease starts getting short.)
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 347.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.2K Spending & Discounts
- 240.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 616.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.4K Life & Family
- 253.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards