cyclists

DullGreyGuy

Goudy said:

Aretnap said:

XRS200 said:

facade said:

The NHS has been charging victims of an RTA for treatment where there is a realistic possibility of being paid- like if there is an identifiable insured vehicle involved, for the best part of a century.

Your insurer is anticipating paying out around £1000 for an ambulance journey and Out Patient treatment.

They won't waste time & money arguing "fault" over £1000, just pay up, hence you will have an "at fault" claim, they record it now as pending.

Wow.  Been a few years but I recall a fee of £19 or £29 - any insurer involved in an accident had to pay it if presented with it, regardless of fault from memory.

Don't forget the 41p/mile for the ambulance!

That might go up soon.

‘Haven’t they got enough money?’: Locals react as royals charge Guy’s and St Thomas’ Trust £11.4m to store ambulances on King’s land in Bermondsey – Southwark News

It already has, its £256 per casualty. The 41p/mile is for the first medical practitioner for getting to the injured person

ThorOdinson

OP, do you have legal cover on your car insurance? And do you have a dashcam?

Petriix

I'm struggling to understand the thread title. Maybe "Cyclist" would be slightly more accurate but something more informative like "Hit by cyclist - insurance implications?".

DullGreyGuy

ThorOdinson said:

OP, do you have legal cover on your car insurance? And do you have a dashcam?

Legal cover is for recovering uninsured losses from the at fault party. The OP hasn't indicated any losses let alone uninsured ones.