We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Ingram Toft claim ref Amigo

UserNo1989
Posts: 2 Newbie

Hello,
I had a loan with Amigo back in 2018.
I had filled in a claim form with Ingram toft to seek compensation from Amigo of which was back in 2020. I am aware that the first scheme was declinded by the high courts in 2021.
I then had emails from Amigo to submit a claim and to ensure my details such as address, bank details were up to date. During this time I did get emails from Ingram toft but also from Amigo with updates on payments due and about scheme updates.
I reveived payment's from amigo of which before these I had 2 invoices from Ingram toft for payments due to them.
My question is that I signed a form in 2020 of which the scheme at the time was declinded. A new scheme was submitted to the high courts and then accepted in 2022. Should ingram toft have asked for permission to seek compensation referancing the new claim or can they continue to use my details and seek compensation without reasking my for my permission?
Thanks.
I had a loan with Amigo back in 2018.
I had filled in a claim form with Ingram toft to seek compensation from Amigo of which was back in 2020. I am aware that the first scheme was declinded by the high courts in 2021.
I then had emails from Amigo to submit a claim and to ensure my details such as address, bank details were up to date. During this time I did get emails from Ingram toft but also from Amigo with updates on payments due and about scheme updates.
I reveived payment's from amigo of which before these I had 2 invoices from Ingram toft for payments due to them.
My question is that I signed a form in 2020 of which the scheme at the time was declinded. A new scheme was submitted to the high courts and then accepted in 2022. Should ingram toft have asked for permission to seek compensation referancing the new claim or can they continue to use my details and seek compensation without reasking my for my permission?
Thanks.
0
Comments
-
In the small print that you agreed to -(Probably by pressing a button!) they have the right.
The mistake you made was going to them in the first place.0 -
Hi,
Thank you for the reply.
On the form submitted it does state this
'I hereby appoint and authorise Ingram Toft to act on mybehalf pursuant to my irresponsible and unfair lending. Inaccordance with clause DISP 2.7.2r of the FinancialConduct Authority handbook. I/We authorise Ingram Toft toaccept or reject on my/our behalf any offer and to refer thecomplaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I / Wefurther authorise my guarantor lender to provideinformation on request to my representatives Ingram Toft.'
i take the view that this is open ended so it could be argued for or against?
I do agree that in hindsight i should have not gone to them.0 -
i take the view that this is open ended so it could be argued for or against?It remains in place until you cancel it, they cancel it, or the contract is completed in its entirety.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
If its opened ended as you say - what legal reason do you have to dispute that you owe them?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards