We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Renting - Council Tax dispute
Comments
-
Yeah I had a feeling this would be the outcome of advice, but I've got a few friends who absolutely insist I shouldn't be paying it....and my thought process is like....hmmmm that could land me in trouble.
I'm willing to stand up for myself with the landlady, but I doubt I'd have much battle against the council themselves!0 -
Absolutely no idea why she’s saying you should be paying buildings insurance though.
It’s her property, she’s the landlady, that one is definitely her responsibility.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.2 -
Yes that's correct - OP only needs content insuranceelsien said:Absolutely no idea why she’s saying you should be paying buildings insurance though.
It’s her property, she’s the landlady, that one is definitely her responsibility.
OP is the landlady claiming single person discount on her CT? Maybe you could agree between you that you pay the CT for your property LESS the discount she gets on hers now you don't officially live with her
Also, look on the bright side - now it's officially a separate dwelling your tenancy is much more secure than when it was considered part of the landlady's house0 -
FlorayG said:Yes that's correct - OP only needs content insurance
OP is the landlady claiming single person discount on her CT? Maybe you could agree between you that you pay the CT for your property LESS the discount she gets on hers now you don't officially live with her
Also, look on the bright side - now it's officially a separate dwelling your tenancy is much more secure than when it was considered part of the landlady's houseIt's likely that the OPs house does not comply with building regulations to get its own council tax, maybe a HMO?0 -
If so that's the landlady's problem, not the OP'sBaldytyke88 said:FlorayG said:Yes that's correct - OP only needs content insurance
OP is the landlady claiming single person discount on her CT? Maybe you could agree between you that you pay the CT for your property LESS the discount she gets on hers now you don't officially live with her
Also, look on the bright side - now it's officially a separate dwelling your tenancy is much more secure than when it was considered part of the landlady's houseIt's likely that the OPs house does not comply with building regulations to get its own council tax, maybe a HMO?0 -
the bottom line is it appears you occupy a self contained dwelling - ie one that enables you to bathe and cook without you needing to use facilities the other side of the connecting door.Curls2208 said:I am as a tenant on the agreement yes, not as a lodger.
The apartment is separate but only through respect so to speak, we have an adjoining door which we don't use but in theory(and probably what the landlady has used as a loophole all these years) I could walk into her place internally, and them into mine, which of course we don't do.
Interesting to hear that the VOA are very slow, they do need to do an assessment which will likely be backdated to me then. Probably months after I move out.
I've always paid council tax on other properties, so that is why I jumped at this property when i was told all bills included, including council tax, which i specifically asked. I feel a little hard done by and wonder if the tenancy agreement is even valid and has already been broken by her. Perhaps chatting to the estate agents who set it up my be a port of call too.
on that basis your LL has been committing tax fraud for 15 years so unsurprising she is annoyed with you.
that said, legal liability for council tax follows a strict order ("Hierarchy of Liability") and a resident occupant is always first, so if you receive a council tax bill in your own name because your dwelling has now been recognised as a (council tax) "annex" then you MUST pay that bill or the council will prosecute you personally for non payment.
as for backdating then obviously you are only liable to whichever comes first. the effective date on which the council tax liability is determined to commence from, or, the date your tenancy commenced if that is after the liability date. It would be up to the council whether they chase the debt prior to your tenancy starting, legally they can, but pragmatically it may not be cost effective for them to do so.
also as others have identified, as you are a legal tenant then you may have grounds for taking legal action action against your own landlady (not the council!) if (big if) your tenancy agreement explicitly states "all bills included".
1 -
Was the property you live in part of the main house at some point? Or was it a separately built annex?
As you presumably have your own entrance then this is a completely separate dwelling that is liable for its own council tax.
If the house was one entity originally and a part has been separated off, then your LL is no doubt still trying to treat it as one property and hence paying the original council tax for it, thinking that it also covers your area. But this would only work if you were a lodger, didn't have your own entrance, and had shared areas in the house.
I can see why the LL is !!!!!! off, albeit not your fault. Are you surely not on HER council tax bill though as part of the main dwelling?Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
I love British irony. This actually made me laugh out loud...but then, I'm not the person in this mess. Best of luck OPBookworm105 said:Curls2208 said:I am as a tenant on the agreement yes, not as a lodger.
The apartment is separate but only through respect so to speak, we have an adjoining door which we don't use but in theory(and probably what the landlady has used as a loophole all these years) I could walk into her place internally, and them into mine, which of course we don't do.
Interesting to hear that the VOA are very slow, they do need to do an assessment which will likely be backdated to me then. Probably months after I move out.
I've always paid council tax on other properties, so that is why I jumped at this property when i was told all bills included, including council tax, which i specifically asked. I feel a little hard done by and wonder if the tenancy agreement is even valid and has already been broken by her. Perhaps chatting to the estate agents who set it up my be a port of call too.
on that basis your LL has been committing tax fraud for 15 years so unsurprising she is annoyed with you.0 -
There is an option you might consider - pay the council tax and deduct that amount from the rent. I think a court would find in your favour if your tenancy specifically says 'all bills'. Also your landlady could be in BIG trouble and expense over this (15 years back CT and 20% tax on the rent possibly? Did you pay a deposit and is this in a protected scheme?)), so might be very willing to negotiate with you to not have things escalate...obviously this is only a possibility, you know the details better and whether or not it could be a solution.
0 -
Most of you have got this nailed on, they'd always been paying for the 'lodger' as part of their main tax and that was how they got around it. I come along all innocent and with experience of renting in the past and see a letter from the council as no bid deal....well turns out it was. She's got her family there, so no, it's not single lodgings for her now.
I can emphasis with the fact she's !!!!!! off with the situation but at the end of the day, she has multiple houses in a posh area down south and is a rich landlady, I don't have that much sympathy for her sob story's but yes, so this forum, some of my friends and Citizens advice bureau just say pay the council tax bill.
In reality that really is the only option. She's a fault finder and will likely try to get all of my deposit when i leave for general wear and tear, so that's maybe where i put up my fight, with the deposit protection scheme, anyway...i guess that's future me's problem. I'll move out at the end of the 12 months and find somewhere a bit cheaper with a landperson who's doing everything legit.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

