We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Stamp Duty with Mum paying off mortgage

Rubbishcook123
Posts: 2 Newbie

Hi All,
I've read quite a few discussions on this but it didn't quite fit our situation so would be grateful for any ideas.
It was always our plan to sell mum's house and buy a place with an annexe for the 5 of us to live in. When we offered on the property, we were told that we would only get it if we were chain free.
We were lucky that we could just about get a mortgage but because of her age (and therefore the cost of repayment) she couldn't be on the title. It was always the plan that she would own 50% and us 50%. Now she has sold and has paid off the mortgage (we do appreciate how lucky we are) and would like her name added to the title because of inheritance tax relief for owning a property.
We were told that we might have to pay Stamp Duty for "selling" the share to her. This seems mad as she's been living in the house since we moved in 3 years ago. Would the intention and the situation we were forced into be a way round the Stamp duty?
Thanks
I've read quite a few discussions on this but it didn't quite fit our situation so would be grateful for any ideas.
It was always our plan to sell mum's house and buy a place with an annexe for the 5 of us to live in. When we offered on the property, we were told that we would only get it if we were chain free.
We were lucky that we could just about get a mortgage but because of her age (and therefore the cost of repayment) she couldn't be on the title. It was always the plan that she would own 50% and us 50%. Now she has sold and has paid off the mortgage (we do appreciate how lucky we are) and would like her name added to the title because of inheritance tax relief for owning a property.
We were told that we might have to pay Stamp Duty for "selling" the share to her. This seems mad as she's been living in the house since we moved in 3 years ago. Would the intention and the situation we were forced into be a way round the Stamp duty?
Thanks
0
Comments
-
I think stamp duty is about paying tax when you exchange payment for land property of a share of same - therefore if you "sell" half of the property to your mother SHE will pay stamp duty on that half of it.2
-
The reason you want to get her on the deeds as actually not required, your mother’s estate can still clamp the residential NRB under the downsizing rules.
If she is happy to make this a gift then while she lives in the property it will not be covered by the 7 year rule so will remain part of her estate for IHT purposes. If this would leave her with little in the way of other significant assets then for her long term security she could make this an interest free loan protected by a charge on the property.1 -
you need a better understanding of inheritance tax - keep_pedalling gives you a starter.
there is nothing mad about taxing movement of wealth amongst family members, otherwise everyone would be playing games to be tax free
mother has "paid off the mortgage" (presumably on the house you now all live in)
you wish to make mother 50% owner of said house
in SDLT terms there has been an exchange of "chargeable consideration" - she paid off the mortgage and in return gets a share of ownership. SDLT would be payable on her "share" of mortgage paid off - as you state ownership is 50/50 then the chargeable consideration is the mortgage value (assuming the mortgage was in your names to start with)
see section :If you transfer or divide up jointly-owned property or land: unmarried couples and other joint owners
Stamp Duty Land Tax: transfer ownership of land or property - GOV.UK0 -
Rubbishcook123 said:Hi All,
I've read quite a few discussions on this but it didn't quite fit our situation so would be grateful for any ideas.
It was always our plan to sell mum's house and buy a place with an annexe for the 5 of us to live in. When we offered on the property, we were told that we would only get it if we were chain free.
We were lucky that we could just about get a mortgage but because of her age (and therefore the cost of repayment) she couldn't be on the title. It was always the plan that she would own 50% and us 50%. Now she has sold and has paid off the mortgage (we do appreciate how lucky we are) and would like her name added to the title because of inheritance tax relief for owning a property.
We were told that we might have to pay Stamp Duty for "selling" the share to her. This seems mad as she's been living in the house since we moved in 3 years ago. Would the intention and the situation we were forced into be a way round the Stamp duty?
Thanks
The starting point here for SDLT would be to work out who now owns the property beneficially. That might not be the same people who are registered proprietors on the registered title.
(a) Perhaps there was a declaration of trust setting out the shares?
(b) Did she put in any capital at the time of the purchase? If so, did she sign something to say it was a gift?
If she does not already have a beneficial interest in the property, then she makes an "acquisition" for SDLT purposes when you transfer her a share. The "chargeable consideration" is what she pays for it, which seems likely to include the sum for paying off the mortgage.1 -
Thanks all, the annoying part is that if we were able to sell her house and buy in a chain, we wouldn't have had this issue as we would all be on the register from day 1.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards