We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Investing for children - taxation
Comments
-
Me personally?wmb194 said:
The problem is that in the past so many people abused it that now the government doesn't trust you.moneytroll said:
I don't think it's ambiguously worded at all. At no point did I say "I" or that the income would be for "ME". There seems to be some comprehension issues here. The children themselves cannot invest so a parent would need to do it for them and I don't understand why the government gives them a personal allowance but won't let them utilise it in any way.artyboy said:
Well for starters, the very first sentence of your first post implies that it's YOU that wants to take advantage of THEIR allowance. Obviously if that was just poorly worded and you are gifting money to your children to be invested solely for their benefit, that is absolutely fine, subject to the usual caveats/risks of having feckless and irresponsible 18 year olds...moneytroll said:
Why are you simply assuming that I would be benefitting from income? The income is to be reinvested.Keep_pedalling said:The rule is there to stop what you appear to be trying to do putting your money into there names but benefiting from the income.
Also I don't understand the logic here: it is ok for grandparents to put the money into a Bare Trust and use the income to pay for, say, private school fees, but it is not ok to do the same for the parents. I don't get it. I think the reason they encourage grand parents to do it and not the parents is because there is a bigger chance that one of them drops dead before 7 years are up.
even if that was the case, I can’t see what’s there to abuse all that much. A wealthy-ish family would put some of their money into a Bare Trust for the kids and use the income most likely to fund expensive school fees. Families that have kids don’t just have kids, keep them at home and instead use all of their income for themselves. Kids cost money no matter what. We are only talking about a personal allowance (private schools cost more than that) it’s not like they can put millions into trusts and not pay any taxes.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards