We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
SDLT on main residence when owning a rental property

richgm
Posts: 11 Forumite


My wife owns our main residence and I own a second home which I rent out. We are currently selling our main residence and purchasing a new one which will again be in my wife's name (Sale and purchase will be completed same day) . We have been advised by our solicitor that we have to pay the higher rate of SDLT but using the government web site calculator and ticking the box to say we own a second property it shows the lower rate. My question is, who's correct? It makes a £16k difference so means we have to raise more funds to complete if it's the higher amount.
0
Comments
-
If you are married or in a civil partnership the SDLT rules treat it as if you were buying the property together even if you are not. However, you (together) are replacing a sole principal private residence so ask the solicitor exactly why the standard rate does not apply.2
-
you are married, so are treated as one "unit"
that unit owns 2 properties, its main home and its BTL
single most important fact: it is selling the main home and "replacing" it with a new main home
Therefore,- if the sale completes on or before the purchase completion then only standard rate is payable (and that is your exact scenario)
- if the sale completes after the purchase then the higher rate is payable at time of purchase, but the excess can be reclaimed if the sale of ex home completes within 3 years of that new purchase.
I am frankly shocked that there still solicitors who do not know this basic stuff, there are only 4 conditions to be assessed and replacement is Condition D
SDLTM09800 - SDLT - higher rates for additional dwellings: Condition D - general - Para 3(6) Sch 4ZA FA2003 - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK
tell your solicitor to learn the examples, starting with the first example given, the married couple...
SDLTM09810 - SDLT - higher rates for additional dwellings: Condition D - further examples - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK4 -
Solicitor is wrong. Who's name each property is under is irrelevant as you're married. As a couple, you own two properties but are replacing your main residence which is being sold. If you sell then buy, then no extra SDLT due on the purchase. If you buy then sell, then HMRC don't know you will sell so the higher SDLT is charged upon purchase, but refunded upon sale.1
-
This is the second thread this evening where a Solicitor is reported to have advised individuals replacing main residence that higher rate SDLT applies.
Either there is complexity in these cases, such as timelines, or the Solicitors are woeful.1 -
Thank you for the replies. I was fairly sure I was right but you expect these people to know what they are talking about and it made me I start to doubt myself.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards