PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

SDLT Increase

24

Comments

  • EssexHebridean
    EssexHebridean Posts: 23,904 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    They CAN - that doesn't mean they SHOULD. @TheJP was (reasonably) saying that they didn't see why this should become the seller's responsibility. 
    🎉 MORTGAGE FREE (First time!) 30/09/2016 🎉 And now we go again…New mortgage taken 01/09/23 🏡
    Balance as at 01/09/23 = £115,000.00 Balance as at 31/12/23 = £112,000.00
    Balance as at 31/08/24 = £105,400.00 Balance as at 31/12/24 = £102,500.00
    SOA CALCULATOR (for DFW newbies): SOA Calculator
    she/her
  • TheJP
    TheJP Posts: 1,879 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    mebu60 said:
    TheJP said:
    mebu60 said:
    Yes. SDLT is at completion. 

    You could try renegotiating the purchase price.
    I don't see why the seller should stump up the cash to pay for the tax the buyer has to pay. Its the buyers responsibility to pay this tax not the seller.
    The buyer would factor in SDLT at the prevailing rate when making the original offer and agreeing a price. If that goes up prior to exchange the buyer has the option of swallowing the increase or renegotiating the price. The seller does not have to accept the latter but then runs the risk of the buyer withdrawing. The original buyer would likely have made a lower offer had they known of the increased rate. Any prospective new purchaser will be factoring in the 5% rate prior to making an offer. It is the buyer's responsibility to pay it as you say but the buyer will have costed that in their calculations prior to agreeing a price. Prior to exchange the potential buyer can withdraw on a whim let alone because their costs have just increased. 
    Only prospective buyers buying a second home would be factoring in the 5%, not a FTB or a sale & purchase buyer. If a buyer said they are offering £x due to the increase in tax then id say ok thanks but no thanks, The OP will either have to swallow up the tax increase or think carefully about buying a second home.
  • Yes.  The country needs the money. 
  • mebu60
    mebu60 Posts: 1,403 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    TheJP said:
    mebu60 said:
    TheJP said:
    mebu60 said:
    Yes. SDLT is at completion. 

    You could try renegotiating the purchase price.
    I don't see why the seller should stump up the cash to pay for the tax the buyer has to pay. Its the buyers responsibility to pay this tax not the seller.
    The buyer would factor in SDLT at the prevailing rate when making the original offer and agreeing a price. If that goes up prior to exchange the buyer has the option of swallowing the increase or renegotiating the price. The seller does not have to accept the latter but then runs the risk of the buyer withdrawing. The original buyer would likely have made a lower offer had they known of the increased rate. Any prospective new purchaser will be factoring in the 5% rate prior to making an offer. It is the buyer's responsibility to pay it as you say but the buyer will have costed that in their calculations prior to agreeing a price. Prior to exchange the potential buyer can withdraw on a whim let alone because their costs have just increased. 
    Only prospective buyers buying a second home would be factoring in the 5%, not a FTB or a sale & purchase buyer. If a buyer said they are offering £x due to the increase in tax then id say ok thanks but no thanks, The OP will either have to swallow up the tax increase or think carefully about buying a second home.
    First sentence GPWM. But there's still the risk that if the current buyer suggests a reduction and the seller declines that an offer from a prospective future purchaser could still be lower whatever their status. And the time delay could risk the seller's own purchase.
  • mebu60
    mebu60 Posts: 1,403 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    They CAN - that doesn't mean they SHOULD. @TheJP was (reasonably) saying that they didn't see why this should become the seller's responsibility. 
    It's not the seller's responsibility, it is the buyer's. I was merely attempting to (reasonably) articulate that the SDLT amount that the buyer will have to pay will impact the seller in how much the buyer is willing to purchase the property for. 

    In this real life case the OP is considering withdrawing which could cost the seller more overall than a few thousand off the price. There's also the possibility that if the OP withdraws the seller might even suggest a modest reduction in an attempt to save the sale. 
  • SonnyH
    SonnyH Posts: 26 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10 Posts
    edited 30 October 2024 at 4:25PM
    TheJP said:
    mebu60 said:
    TheJP said:
    mebu60 said:
    Yes. SDLT is at completion. 

    You could try renegotiating the purchase price.
    I don't see why the seller should stump up the cash to pay for the tax the buyer has to pay. Its the buyers responsibility to pay this tax not the seller.
    The buyer would factor in SDLT at the prevailing rate when making the original offer and agreeing a price. If that goes up prior to exchange the buyer has the option of swallowing the increase or renegotiating the price. The seller does not have to accept the latter but then runs the risk of the buyer withdrawing. The original buyer would likely have made a lower offer had they known of the increased rate. Any prospective new purchaser will be factoring in the 5% rate prior to making an offer. It is the buyer's responsibility to pay it as you say but the buyer will have costed that in their calculations prior to agreeing a price. Prior to exchange the potential buyer can withdraw on a whim let alone because their costs have just increased. 
    Only prospective buyers buying a second home would be factoring in the 5%, not a FTB or a sale & purchase buyer. If a buyer said they are offering £x due to the increase in tax then id say ok thanks but no thanks, The OP will either have to swallow up the tax increase or think carefully about buying a second home.
    I guess the main frustration is the 'effective tomorrow' element. We're four months into a painfully slow buying process (the house buying/selling in England & Wales is dreadful for all parties, but that's a whole different thread and debate). To suddenly have the price changed is unreasonable (as a poster correctly pointed out, we'd factored tax costs in using the govt's own SDLT calculator). It's also very unfair to the seller if they end up back at square one if we decide not to proceed.
  • TheJP said:
    mebu60 said:
    Yes. SDLT is at completion. 

    You could try renegotiating the purchase price.
    I don't see why the seller should stump up the cash to pay for the tax the buyer has to pay. Its the buyers responsibility to pay this tax not the seller.
    It is you are correct but the buyer can legitimately reassess whether or not the purchase still makes sense.

    OP: If it was me, I think about suggesting the seller "meets me in the middle" re the extra 2%. i.e. he reduces by 1%. A risk if you're really set on the place but he has to weigh whether he really wants to go through the legals again in what might be a sinking market.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 16,713 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 30 October 2024 at 4:36PM
    SonnyH said:
    TheJP said:
    mebu60 said:
    TheJP said:
    mebu60 said:
    Yes. SDLT is at completion. 

    You could try renegotiating the purchase price.
    I don't see why the seller should stump up the cash to pay for the tax the buyer has to pay. Its the buyers responsibility to pay this tax not the seller.
    The buyer would factor in SDLT at the prevailing rate when making the original offer and agreeing a price. If that goes up prior to exchange the buyer has the option of swallowing the increase or renegotiating the price. The seller does not have to accept the latter but then runs the risk of the buyer withdrawing. The original buyer would likely have made a lower offer had they known of the increased rate. Any prospective new purchaser will be factoring in the 5% rate prior to making an offer. It is the buyer's responsibility to pay it as you say but the buyer will have costed that in their calculations prior to agreeing a price. Prior to exchange the potential buyer can withdraw on a whim let alone because their costs have just increased. 
    Only prospective buyers buying a second home would be factoring in the 5%, not a FTB or a sale & purchase buyer. If a buyer said they are offering £x due to the increase in tax then id say ok thanks but no thanks, The OP will either have to swallow up the tax increase or think carefully about buying a second home.
    To suddenly have the price changed is unreasonable 
    To be fair, that's what has always happened previously when stamp duty or other taxes increase at Budgets, so shouldn't be a massive surprise (hence the panicked attempts to conclude various transactions before lunchtime today....). There's got to be some sort of cut off date, it'll be "unfair" for somebody.
  • In some ways the OPs reaction is what the government is hoping for, either more money in SDLT for the countries coffers or another house for a person to live in rather than have as a second home.  
    Ahh but its not usually a second home. The most common use case is a second property - i.e. buy2let. So that would be one less rental on the market. The person who might have rented that property is unlikely to be able to afford to buy. So as I see it the net effect is downward pressure on property prices (good many would say) and upward pressure on rentals.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 348.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 240.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 617.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.6K Life & Family
  • 254K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.