We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Landlord not returning deposit after not protecting it properly
Options
Comments
-
Nothing to stop the OP doing both.
Making proper efforts to regain the current deposit through the scheme doesn't preclude taking the LL to court for late registration.If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing3 -
The less stressful option would be to dispute the full amount in with the protection scheme and ask for it all back.
THEN... also write to the LL stating that unless your current deposit is returned promptly in FULL, you will be suing him for failing to protect the deposit in year 1 and year 2 of the tenancy along with failing to carry out gas safety checks, and will be asking the court for 3x the deposit which you are legally entitled to do.
Hopefully the LL will see sense and return deposits quickly in full.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
Any letter needs to be very carefully worded. Threatening adverse action if you don't get your own way can be blackmail
If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing0 -
RAS said:Nothing to stop the OP doing both.
Making proper efforts to regain the current deposit through the scheme doesn't preclude taking the LL to court for late registration.
I only ask as they have been horrific landlords and I believe they are doing this scaremongering to multiple tenants.0 -
Absolutely. Nothing to prevent you taking them to court for all three years.
Just if the court would have made them repay all three deposits plus a 1 times penalty for each, they are likely to deduct the amount you have received back from the award. Acknowledging that the LL has returned the most recent deposit in part or in total does not alter the fact that they were late registering it and failed to register previous ones. And you have shown that you have taken action to mitigate your loss.
You do need to get on with reclaiming the deposit promptly as there may be a time limit.
If you think this LL is a serial offender, you really should try speaking to the private tenancy officer at the local Council and the Health and Safety Executive. They may already know the LL but I believe they are the responsible party who prosecute for gas safety failure. If none of the tenants ever report the LL, no-one who can take action will ever know.
If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing1 -
kbubbles61 said:Hi everyone,
Hoping someone can help me as feeling overwhelmed by all the information online! I have recently moved out of a property on an AST tenancy. My landlord has responded about the deposit saying they won't be returning any of it and that we in fact owe them around £1000 on top (but kindly offered a discount if we don't dispute!).
My vote is for applying for the return of the deposit, waiting for that to complete, and then applying for the penalty for not returning the deposit. I believe that the time limit for taking action is six years from when the breach occurred. So, keep an eye on the clock. (Sorry if this has already been mentioned and is well in hand. EDIT: @RAS mentioned the six year limit.)
Also, please keep us informed as to what happens.0 -
How many deposit companies are there? And how easy is it to check 'your' deposit with them?
Could this LL be potentially liable for compensating each tenant individually?0 -
ThisIsWeird said:How many deposit companies are there? And how easy is it to check 'your' deposit with them?
Could this LL be potentially liable for compensating each tenant individually?
There are three deposit schemes in the UK, and Shelter lists the phone numbers for each. I believe there have been previous postrs where people have said that they phoned each of the schemes and found that their deposit wasn't protected by any. https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/tenancy_deposits/check_your_tenancy_deposit_is_protected
I'd like to know the answer to your (@ThisIsWeird's) last question too. I have a vague belief that it depends on the type of tenancy, and am watching for more information on that.0 -
Easy enough to check. I once did for a family member with limited on-line access.
In this case, there have been three tenancy agreements (appear to be joint) with different deposit amounts required each time.
Based on previous threads here I anticipate the LL having to return all three (even through the same money was rolled forward with an add-on each year) plus at least one times the amount each year as a penalty. Although different judges might think differently.
The fact that the LL has registered this year, albeit late, makes me wonder if they or an acquaintance have been taken to court by another tenant. Just speculation.If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing2 -
Hi everyone,
So reached out to the schemes and one has come back with the certificates for all three years so it was protected, however we never received any communication on this - which I believe they're also required to do by law? Advice on this seems a bit vague as anything I can find is about if they never protected it at all, rather than if they did but never gave any information on it.
At this point, I just want my deposit back and to not also owe them an extra £1k on top for fair wear and tear (which I would dispute in the scheme). Shelter seems to suggest I can tell them they didn't give me the information and to return my deposit in full or I could take them to court?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards