We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Rejecting a claim

A few years ago we had difficulty with a travel insurance claim. My wife suffrede a brain bleed but the insurer queried it because we had not (inadvertently) declared a pre existing condition from a long time past which bore no relation to the brain bleed. At the time my daughter found an article by - I believe - the British Insurance Association stating that insurers must not reject a claim for a condition on the basis of a non declared pre condition unless it was relevant. We cannot find the article. Does anyone know anything helpful?

Comments

  • Annemos
    Annemos Posts: 882 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 500 Posts
    There are 40 cases in here on the FOS website. I did the search on "travel claim denied pre-existing conditions". 

    If you can take a look through some of these, it will give you an idea of how The Ombudsman views such cases. 


    https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decisions-case-studies/ombudsman-decisions/search?Keyword=travel+claim+denied+pre-existing+conditions&IndustrySectorID%5B3%5D=3&Sort=relevance
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 13,942 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    lionish said:
    A few years ago we had difficulty with a travel insurance claim. My wife suffrede a brain bleed but the insurer queried it because we had not (inadvertently) declared a pre existing condition from a long time past which bore no relation to the brain bleed. At the time my daughter found an article by - I believe - the British Insurance Association stating that insurers must not reject a claim for a condition on the basis of a non declared pre condition unless it was relevant. We cannot find the article. Does anyone know anything helpful?
    The law changed in 2012 unfortunately. The ABI isn't a regulatory body and can only provide rules for its members and not all insurers selling insurance in the UK are members. If members dont follow its rules the worst it can do is apply modest fines and revoke their membership. 

    Parliament introduced the legislation  Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 which materially changed matters. Its rules are:

    • Customer intentionally or recklessly didnt disclose something (accurately) - void the policy, avoid the claim, keep premiums
    • Customer carelessly didnt disclose something and you wouldn't have insured them had it been disclosed - cancel the policy, avoid the claim, refund premiums
    • Customer carelessly didnt disclose something and you would have insured them had it been disclosed - pay the claim but reduce settlement to reflect the proportion of under paid premium


    Ultimately it comes down to two things... do they think it was careless or worse? Would they have provided cover had it been declared? Whether the non-disclosure is related to the claim or not is no longer of any consequence under the CIDRA legislation.

    What was the condition? How long ago before you bought the policy was it? What is your explanation for why it wasnt reported?

Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 346.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 238.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 614.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 174.7K Life & Family
  • 252K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.