We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

DB Pension - Options available - either take annual value or transfer to another provider

245

Comments

  • MrsWenger
    MrsWenger Posts: 416 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    MrsWenger said:
    I would be grateful for any information in relation to my enquiry please.

    I have a small DB pension from a company I worked for from 1991-1999. I have received a letter from Legal and General which gives two options; an annual pension of £945.00 or a cash sum surrender of £19,740.00. This cash sum was based on Triviality but I have other pensions so the combined value exceeds £30,000. 

    I have spoken to Legal & General who advise that as I do not meet the criteria for Triviality my only options are to see if I can transfer to my other pension provider, Aviva, or to take the pension as an annual value. My preference would be to have taken the cash surrender value. Can anyone explain why this is not possible please?
    Is £945 the annual pension when you left in 1999 or the annual pension now (it looks a bit low for 8 years service and 25 years in deferment). 
    Hi FIREDreamer, it is the annual pension now. It has increased slightly in the revised letter they emailed me after calling them yesterday, £965.28.


  • MrsWenger
    MrsWenger Posts: 416 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    cloud_dog said:
    dunstonh said:
    You may find it difficult to transfer a DB pension to another provider.   Whilst the rules say that you can transfer without advice it if its under £30k, receiving schemes often will not accept a DB transfer in, regardless of value unless an adviser is transacting it (stakeholder pensions excluded).

    When you speak to aviva, make sure you tell them that the source scheme is defined benefit.

    Remember that just because the amount is small, doesn't mean it is sensible to transfer it.  Plus, the annual income will increase.  So, it will be less than 20 years before it breaks even (assuming the £945 is the current figure that has been uprated and not the original figure when leaving)
    Anecdotally I am aware that Vanguard will (have previously) accept a DB transfer for a value less than £30k.
    Thank you cloud_dog.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,850 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 October 2024 at 8:50AM
     To start with your state pension (forgive me if this information is superfluous)


    At 6/4/16, two calculations were done to establish your starting amount for NSP as you would reach SPA in the new scheme.

    It was the higher of

    Old Rules

    NI qualifying years/30 (max) x Full Basic State Pension + ( Additional State Pension - Deduction for Contracting Out).

    New Rules

    NIQY/35 (max) x Full NSP - (Contracted Out Pension Equivalent).

    As your  latest ( I am assuming to 5/4/24) pension forecast indicates an amount in excess of the current full NSP ( £221.20 a

    week), your starting amount was also in excess of a full NSP at 6/4/16.

    That is to say it was more than £155.65.

    Since then, the £155.65 has increased to £221.20 while the balance (your "protected payment") has increased to  £17.70.

    As far as is known at the moment, the £221.20 will increase annually under the triple lock while the PP will increase by CPI.


    With regard to the DB pension, I have to agree with  a  previous poster that it does look rather low for seven/eight years

    service and 25 years in deferment.

    I wonder do you still have your statement of benefits on leaving service showing

    Post 88 GMP

    Excess over GMP?

    and a scheme guide showing how (a) the GMP and (b) the excess revalued in deferment?


    I suppose it is possible that you have a S32  (or similar) with L&G where the situation is as described here?


    https://www.financialadvice.net/s32_buy_out_plan/zone/1288

    That is to say you are receiving only your GMP revalued to age 60 and there is not enough in the policy to pay you anything above the

    GMP (SMP) or allow you to take tax free cash?

    However, you are guaranteed that your pension will receive an RPI uplift (up to 3% RPI) each April.

    This is because where a person has post 88 GMP as part of their pension, the scheme must escalate that portion by up to 3% inflation

    (usually CPI nowadays rather that RPI but this is scheme dependent).

    https://techzone.abrdn.com/public/pensions/Tech-guide-guaranteed-min-pen#:~:text=Guaranteed minimum pension, commonly known,1978 and 5 April 1997.

    You may prefer not to transfer out but keep the pension as part of your guaranteed retirement  provision?

  • Triumph13
    Triumph13 Posts: 2,073 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    edited 4 October 2024 at 8:13AM
    MrsWenger said:
    MrsWenger said:
    I would be grateful for any information in relation to my enquiry please.

    I have a small DB pension from a company I worked for from 1991-1999. I have received a letter from Legal and General which gives two options; an annual pension of £945.00 or a cash sum surrender of £19,740.00. This cash sum was based on Triviality but I have other pensions so the combined value exceeds £30,000. 

    I have spoken to Legal & General who advise that as I do not meet the criteria for Triviality my only options are to see if I can transfer to my other pension provider, Aviva, or to take the pension as an annual value. My preference would be to have taken the cash surrender value. Can anyone explain why this is not possible please?
    Is £945 the annual pension when you left in 1999 or the annual pension now (it looks a bit low for 8 years service and 25 years in deferment). 
    Hi FIREDreamer, it is the annual pension now. It has increased slightly in the revised letter they emailed me after calling them yesterday, £965.28.


    Would I be correct in my guess that this was a part time job?  It doesn't change anything, but it would explain why people were confused about it being so small :)
  • MrsWenger
    MrsWenger Posts: 416 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    xylophone said:
     To start with your state pension (forgive me if this information is superfluous)


    At 6/4/16, two calculations were done to establish your starting amount for NSP as you would reach SPA in the new scheme.

    It was the higher of

    Old Rules

    NI qualifying years/30 (max) x Full Basic State Pension + ( Additional State Pension - Deduction for Contracting Out).

    New Rules

    NIQY/35 (max) x Full NSP - (Contracted Out Pension Equivalent).

    As your  latest ( I am assuming to 5/4/24) pension forecast indicates an amount in excess of the current full NSP ( £221.20 a

    week), your starting amount was also in excess of a full NSP at 6/4/16.

    That is to say it was more than £155.65.

    Since then, the £155.65 has increased to £221.20 while the balance (your "protected payment") has increased to  £17.70.

    As far as is known at the moment, the £221.20 will increase annually under the triple lock while the PP will increase by CPI.


    With regard to the DB pension, I have to agree with  a  previous poster that it does look rather low for seven/eight years

    service and 25 years in deferment.

    I wonder do you still have your statement of benefits on leaving service showing

    Post 88 GMP

    Excess over GMP?

    and a scheme guide showing how (a) the GMP and (b) the excess revalued in deferment?  I am not sure if I have these documents, I will check over the weekend.

    I suppose it is possible that you have a S32  (or similar) with L&G where the situation is as described here? I believe you are correct when you mention receiving only the GMP valuation based on there not being enough in the pot for more. I will review the information in the links you shared. 


    https://www.financialadvice.net/s32_buy_out_plan/zone/1288

    That is to say you are receiving only your GMP revalued to age 60 and there is not enough in the policy to pay you anything above the

    GMP (SMP) or allow you to take tax free cash? Please see reply above.

    However, you are guaranteed that your pension will receive an RPI uplift (up to 3% RPI) each April.

    This is because where a person has post 88 GMP as part of their pension, the scheme must escalate that portion by up to 3% inflation

    (usually CPI nowadays rather that RPI but this is scheme dependent).

    https://techzone.abrdn.com/public/pensions/Tech-guide-guaranteed-min-pen#:~:text=Guaranteed minimum pension, commonly known,1978 and 5 April 1997.

    You may prefer not to transfer out but keep the pension as part of your guaranteed retirement  provision? Yes, I think this is something I should revisit and consider.

    Thank you again for your reply Xylophone. 

    I appreciate you explaining the state pension calculation, it is helpful to understand the methodology used.

    As before, I have added replies above.
  • MrsWenger
    MrsWenger Posts: 416 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    Triumph13 said:
    MrsWenger said:
    MrsWenger said:
    I would be grateful for any information in relation to my enquiry please.

    I have a small DB pension from a company I worked for from 1991-1999. I have received a letter from Legal and General which gives two options; an annual pension of £945.00 or a cash sum surrender of £19,740.00. This cash sum was based on Triviality but I have other pensions so the combined value exceeds £30,000. 

    I have spoken to Legal & General who advise that as I do not meet the criteria for Triviality my only options are to see if I can transfer to my other pension provider, Aviva, or to take the pension as an annual value. My preference would be to have taken the cash surrender value. Can anyone explain why this is not possible please?
    Is £945 the annual pension when you left in 1999 or the annual pension now (it looks a bit low for 8 years service and 25 years in deferment). 
    Hi FIREDreamer, it is the annual pension now. It has increased slightly in the revised letter they emailed me after calling them yesterday, £965.28.


    Would I be correct in my guess that this was a part time job?  It doesn't change anything, but it would explain why people were confused about it being so small :)
    Good thought Triumph13 but it was a full time job 🙂

    I think Xylophone’s comment about there being an insufficient pot is the likely reason. 
  • MrsWenger
    MrsWenger Posts: 416 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    Just a quick update to advise I haven’t been able to find the paperwork yet.


  • FIREDreamer
    FIREDreamer Posts: 1,198 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    MrsWenger said:
    Triumph13 said:
    MrsWenger said:
    MrsWenger said:
    I would be grateful for any information in relation to my enquiry please.

    I have a small DB pension from a company I worked for from 1991-1999. I have received a letter from Legal and General which gives two options; an annual pension of £945.00 or a cash sum surrender of £19,740.00. This cash sum was based on Triviality but I have other pensions so the combined value exceeds £30,000. 

    I have spoken to Legal & General who advise that as I do not meet the criteria for Triviality my only options are to see if I can transfer to my other pension provider, Aviva, or to take the pension as an annual value. My preference would be to have taken the cash surrender value. Can anyone explain why this is not possible please?
    Is £945 the annual pension when you left in 1999 or the annual pension now (it looks a bit low for 8 years service and 25 years in deferment). 
    Hi FIREDreamer, it is the annual pension now. It has increased slightly in the revised letter they emailed me after calling them yesterday, £965.28.


    Would I be correct in my guess that this was a part time job?  It doesn't change anything, but it would explain why people were confused about it being so small :)
    Good thought Triumph13 but it was a full time job 🙂

    I think Xylophone’s comment about there being an insufficient pot is the likely reason. 
    This is why I thought the pension was low.

    Pension now = £965
    Pension when leaving in 1999 = £965 / 1.989 = £485 (reversing out the revaluation in the table below)
    For 8 years service this is £60 per year.
    For a 1/60 pension this would suggest a pensionable salary of £3,600 pa on leaving in 1999.

    Pension = £3,600 x 8/60 = £480.00

    That seems very low for a full time salary.

    Minimum wage in 1999 was £3.60 per hour so for a 35 hour week would be £6,552 per annum.

    Something doesn’t add up here I’m afraid.


  • Shimrod
    Shimrod Posts: 1,196 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    MrsWenger said:
    Triumph13 said:
    MrsWenger said:
    MrsWenger said:
    I would be grateful for any information in relation to my enquiry please.

    I have a small DB pension from a company I worked for from 1991-1999. I have received a letter from Legal and General which gives two options; an annual pension of £945.00 or a cash sum surrender of £19,740.00. This cash sum was based on Triviality but I have other pensions so the combined value exceeds £30,000. 

    I have spoken to Legal & General who advise that as I do not meet the criteria for Triviality my only options are to see if I can transfer to my other pension provider, Aviva, or to take the pension as an annual value. My preference would be to have taken the cash surrender value. Can anyone explain why this is not possible please?
    Is £945 the annual pension when you left in 1999 or the annual pension now (it looks a bit low for 8 years service and 25 years in deferment). 
    Hi FIREDreamer, it is the annual pension now. It has increased slightly in the revised letter they emailed me after calling them yesterday, £965.28.


    Would I be correct in my guess that this was a part time job?  It doesn't change anything, but it would explain why people were confused about it being so small :)
    Good thought Triumph13 but it was a full time job 🙂

    I think Xylophone’s comment about there being an insufficient pot is the likely reason. 
    This is why I thought the pension was low.

    Pension now = £965
    Pension when leaving in 1999 = £965 / 1.989 = £485 (reversing out the revaluation in the table below)
    For 8 years service this is £60 per year.
    For a 1/60 pension this would suggest a pensionable salary of £3,600 pa on leaving in 1999.

    Pension = £3,600 x 8/60 = £480.00

    That seems very low for a full time salary.

    Minimum wage in 1999 was £3.60 per hour so for a 35 hour week would be £6,552 per annum.

    Something doesn’t add up here I’m afraid.


    It could be the definition of pensionable salary. For example mine requires the deduction of the lower earning limit from my final salary - for 1999 that's about £3500 so would fit with your calculations in this instance.


  • Shimrod said:
    MrsWenger said:
    Triumph13 said:
    MrsWenger said:
    MrsWenger said:
    I would be grateful for any information in relation to my enquiry please.

    I have a small DB pension from a company I worked for from 1991-1999. I have received a letter from Legal and General which gives two options; an annual pension of £945.00 or a cash sum surrender of £19,740.00. This cash sum was based on Triviality but I have other pensions so the combined value exceeds £30,000. 

    I have spoken to Legal & General who advise that as I do not meet the criteria for Triviality my only options are to see if I can transfer to my other pension provider, Aviva, or to take the pension as an annual value. My preference would be to have taken the cash surrender value. Can anyone explain why this is not possible please?
    Is £945 the annual pension when you left in 1999 or the annual pension now (it looks a bit low for 8 years service and 25 years in deferment). 
    Hi FIREDreamer, it is the annual pension now. It has increased slightly in the revised letter they emailed me after calling them yesterday, £965.28.


    Would I be correct in my guess that this was a part time job?  It doesn't change anything, but it would explain why people were confused about it being so small :)
    Good thought Triumph13 but it was a full time job 🙂

    I think Xylophone’s comment about there being an insufficient pot is the likely reason. 
    This is why I thought the pension was low.

    Pension now = £965
    Pension when leaving in 1999 = £965 / 1.989 = £485 (reversing out the revaluation in the table below)
    For 8 years service this is £60 per year.
    For a 1/60 pension this would suggest a pensionable salary of £3,600 pa on leaving in 1999.

    Pension = £3,600 x 8/60 = £480.00

    That seems very low for a full time salary.

    Minimum wage in 1999 was £3.60 per hour so for a 35 hour week would be £6,552 per annum.

    Something doesn’t add up here I’m afraid.


    It could be the definition of pensionable salary. For example mine requires the deduction of the lower earning limit from my final salary - for 1999 that's about £3500 so would fit with your calculations in this instance.


    That's harsh 😥
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.