We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
New landlord (me) - some queries
Comments
-
Agreed. They can pay a bit for a better door if they want, but it should be clear that the door 100% belongs to the house, and they have no ownership of it.Grumpy_chap said:
Well, that seems a bit of an odd idea - I mean the T will move out, so you will have to buy their "share" of the door. The only unknown is the timing of when you have to buy that share of the door.ButterCheese said:
Yes good point. It was them who suggested paying extra for a roller door, but reading other comments it does pose a potential problem, and I also don't want to set a precedent i.e. I have no intention of improving the property out of my own pocket when I'm not living there. I will speak to them about it and suggest that we sign an agreement that I have to buy their share of the door from them if they move outRHemmings said:I wouldn't say it's unfair to ask for the additional £700, and your tenant may agree. But, I think this is the kind of thing that could cause concerns for the tenant - e.g. will you ask for other sums of money in the future.
What price will you buy that share of the door at?
The current £700?
The £700 less a proportionate depreciation based on expected life of a door?
What if the relationship is soured by the time the T leaves?
It may all be very well and good now having an agreement that says the T will pay £700 for the door and the LL will buy that door back at "X" tenths of the original value depending on how many years have passed, so "X" starts at "10" and reduces to "0" after ten years.
If the T is an awkward so-and-so when leaving and says they want the full £700 back, or gets silly and literally cuts 40% off the door to take with them, you'll be left with 60% of a door and very little you can do about it...0 -
RHemmings said:Agreed. They can pay a bit for a better door if they want, but it should be clear that the door 100% belongs to the house, and they have no ownership of it.If you were a tenant, RHemmings, and suggested to your LL you'd contribute ~70% extra towards what is clearly a more practical garage door, how would you respond to your LL's three possible options;1) No.2) Ok, but it's MY door - 100%.3) Ok, and should you leave within X years, I'd refund a diminishing proportion.Granted that 2 is fair enough, but Butter ain't yer normal LL :-)But, fair do's - option 3 is entirely, er, optional.1
-
Well they probably will leave at some point, even if its in 15 years.. would you still pay for it then?ButterCheese said:
Yes good point. It was them who suggested paying extra for a roller door, but reading other comments it does pose a potential problem, and I also don't want to set a precedent i.e. I have no intention of improving the property out of my own pocket when I'm not living there. I will speak to them about it and suggest that we sign an agreement that I have to buy their share of the door from them if they move outRHemmings said:I wouldn't say it's unfair to ask for the additional £700, and your tenant may agree. But, I think this is the kind of thing that could cause concerns for the tenant - e.g. will you ask for other sums of money in the future.
I would have suggested if the LL serves a no-fault notice in the next [2] years (or whatever) then they'll back 50% of the cost, else nothing. You don't want to incentivise the tenant choosing to leave themselves or breaching terms to push you to evict for cause. However that'll likely soon become a thing of the past anyway, so probably little point in getting into the weeds.0 -
I would think that 2 is the correct option. But, I would never ever even think of contributing £700 for a door. I did pay £9 for two apple trees from Aldi, and they fully became property of the landlord. But, that's an extremely different situation due to the cost being orders of magnitude different. When a landlord refused to replace the washing machine, I bought one. But, that's mobile and I still have it now. Again, a very different situation.ThisIsWeird said:RHemmings said:Agreed. They can pay a bit for a better door if they want, but it should be clear that the door 100% belongs to the house, and they have no ownership of it.If you were a tenant, RHemmings, and suggested to your LL you'd contribute ~70% extra towards what is clearly a more practical garage door, how would you respond to your LL's three possible options;1) No.2) Ok, but it's MY door - 100%.3) Ok, and should you leave within X years, I'd refund a diminishing proportion.Granted that 2 is fair enough, but Butter ain't yer normal LL :-)But, fair do's - option 3 is entirely, er, optional.
Personally I would not expect 3 and would be very, very, surprised if a landlord suggested it.1 -
ThisIsWeird said:
You do need to increase your rent, but it would be unfair to bring it anywhere close to 'market' in one swoop,Thanks for such an in-depth reply. This is what I was pretty much thinking (now I've slept on it). They do appreciate the chance I've given them, but they also keep the house immaculately and have made some very tasteful changes to the garden at their own expense (with my permission). So I am happy to have them as tenants, purely because they keep the house nice and they only complain when something has actually broken.But yes, it is a business not a charity. The house is mortgage free but I have a mortgage on my (larger) new house which also costs a bomb to run, and of course those costs are rising. So I will prepare some examples of similar 3 bed properties (with a driveway and garage) so they know where I'm coming from. I think a 5% increase per year (£42 this year) is quite fair.Re: the garage door, I've actually fixed it. It works (and is electric). So I don't actually have to do anything now but it does look old and could stick/break again at any point in the future. So I'll present the quote for a new like-for-like which I'm happy to pay for, and the quote for the more expensive roller door which I will invite them to pay towards if they want it. They are desperate to stay for as long as they can, so I don't think me buying back the door if they leave would be an issue, but I will take that on the chin should it occur.
2 -
Sounds like an ideal arrangement, Butter
0 -
I would be saying along the lines ofButterCheese said:ThisIsWeird said:
You do need to increase your rent, but it would be unfair to bring it anywhere close to 'market' in one swoop,Thanks for such an in-depth reply. This is what I was pretty much thinking (now I've slept on it). They do appreciate the chance I've given them, but they also keep the house immaculately and have made some very tasteful changes to the garden at their own expense (with my permission). So I am happy to have them as tenants, purely because they keep the house nice and they only complain when something has actually broken.But yes, it is a business not a charity. The house is mortgage free but I have a mortgage on my (larger) new house which also costs a bomb to run, and of course those costs are rising. So I will prepare some examples of similar 3 bed properties (with a driveway and garage) so they know where I'm coming from. I think a 5% increase per year (£42 this year) is quite fair.Re: the garage door, I've actually fixed it. It works (and is electric). So I don't actually have to do anything now but it does look old and could stick/break again at any point in the future. So I'll present the quote for a new like-for-like which I'm happy to pay for, and the quote for the more expensive roller door which I will invite them to pay towards if they want it. They are desperate to stay for as long as they can, so I don't think me buying back the door if they leave would be an issue, but I will take that on the chin should it occur.
We will install the roller garage door as requested without any contribution but we will be raising your rent to £1050 in line with the local market which will allow us to recoup the extra expense.
0 -
Yes that makes sense but for the tenants a rise of £200/month is very extreme. My plan is to slowly raise it up to market value to give them a chance to adjust their living habits accordingly. I've gone from 850 to 900 this year (and given them 3 months notice) so next year I shall do the same.blackshirtuk said:
I would be saying along the lines of
We will install the roller garage door as requested without any contribution but we will be raising your rent to £1050 in line with the local market which will allow us to recoup the extra expense.
1 -
Since you actually fixed the existing garage door, there is obviously no onus on you to act on it at all for the moment. If you wish to delay a decision on it, then you could tell them an 'upgrade' with their contribution is certainly something you'll consider when it does come to need replacing. You can add that 'finding £1k at the moment for something that isn't essential is a bit tricky....'
(Mind you, they'll probably nobble it then!)1 -
The market will also probably run away from you then by that time, so you'll always be ~£200 under market. Even if f in a few years rents don't rise, it'll be harder to justify your gradual increases even if still under market when the headlines say prices are going down.ButterCheese said:
Yes that makes sense but for the tenants a rise of £200/month is very extreme. My plan is to slowly raise it up to market value to give them a chance to adjust their living habits accordingly. I've gone from 850 to 900 this year (and given them 3 months notice) so next year I shall do the same.blackshirtuk said:
I would be saying along the lines of
We will install the roller garage door as requested without any contribution but we will be raising your rent to £1050 in line with the local market which will allow us to recoup the extra expense.
Plus its not extreme if you're including an upgrade to roller door, which is something they wanted. Can always give them the option, eg £x increase with the door as is or £y increase with the new roller door.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
