We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
DFS Sofa - Section 75
Comments
-
Just spoke to credit card, yes they processed £100 as chargeback. I told them I made section 75 claim for total amount. They said they will forward case to Section 75 now and should hear back soon.0
-
Hello OP
Just to clarify they only get one attempt at repair after which you may exercise the final right to reject, if you would prefer the refund stick to your guns regarding rejecting and don't allow any further repair attempts
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces2 -
Where £100 is paid on CC and the remainder on linked finance (Creation zero percent), does each credit provider remain liable for the full value of the goods?
I am certain that the OP can only recover the total of original paid, and not the full amount from both credit providers.
Are there rules or protocols as to whether the S75 should be pursued against the financier with the largest stake?0 -
If you're within 30 days of arrival you can reject the entire order under your "short term right to reject". If it's longer than 30 days since delivery, but the fault has not been satisfactorily repaired (which going off your photos, it hasn't), you can reject it as the repair has failed. You should send DFS a letter before action in writing (email or recorded post letter) that you're rejecting the order for a full refund and that you await their response to arrange the collection of the faulty goods. You can find details on how to write a letter before action on MSE - don't forget to put in that you expect a response from them within a set period of time (14 days for eg) and that you will take further action if you're unable to reach a satisfactory conclusion. After you've told them you're rejecting it, if they don't respond or they refuse, that's when you go to your finance provider and tell them you need to make a section 75 claim. At that point you can also report them to Trading Standards, although they won't do anything for you directly.
1 -
I have said to them via letter and email that I am rejecting it exactly how you said above. They are refusing to collect and refund on the basis that there is no fault. Even though I have sent them photos.sonearandyetsofa said:If you're within 30 days of arrival you can reject the entire order under your "short term right to reject". If it's longer than 30 days since delivery, but the fault has not been satisfactorily repaired (which going off your photos, it hasn't), you can reject it as the repair has failed. You should send DFS a letter before action in writing (email or recorded post letter) that you're rejecting the order for a full refund and that you await their response to arrange the collection of the faulty goods. You can find details on how to write a letter before action on MSE - don't forget to put in that you expect a response from them within a set period of time (14 days for eg) and that you will take further action if you're unable to reach a satisfactory conclusion. After you've told them you're rejecting it, if they don't respond or they refuse, that's when you go to your finance provider and tell them you need to make a section 75 claim. At that point you can also report them to Trading Standards, although they won't do anything for you directly.0 -
No they can't claim the full amount from both.Grumpy_chap said:Where £100 is paid on CC and the remainder on linked finance (Creation zero percent), does each credit provider remain liable for the full value of the goods?
I am certain that the OP can only recover the total of original paid, and not the full amount from both credit providers.
Are there rules or protocols as to whether the S75 should be pursued against the financier with the largest stake?
CC will say to go to creation as they have the larger interest. No way to avoid them knowing as they will want to know how the rest has been paid.
Which TBH is fair. Even if actually you can go after either.Life in the slow lane0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
