Martin Lewis: Car finance mis-selling update – complaint decisions delayed, redress "more likely"

MSE_Molly_G
MSE_Molly_G Posts: 169 MSE Staff
10 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
edited 17 March at 10:31AM in Reclaim car finance
The outcome of a major investigation into hidden, unfair car finance commission will be pushed back from September 2024 to May 2025, it's been announced. But the regulator behind the probe has told MoneySavingExpert.com founder Martin Lewis that payouts to drivers are now "more likely".

Read the full story:

Martin Lewis: Car finance mis-selling update – complaint decisions delayed but redress payments now "more likely"

If you haven't already, join the forum to reply.
«1

Comments

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,430 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 13,832 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Nasqueron said:
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future
    Why would that be?

  • MattMattMattUK
    MattMattMattUK Posts: 10,637 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    prowla said:
    Nasqueron said:
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future
    Why would that be?
    Specifically if the new car is bought on finance. The finance companies as part of their business model will need to increase their revenue and gross profits to cover the additional cost of payouts, which will mean higher interest rates charged on new finance products. 
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 17,192 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    prowla said:
    Nasqueron said:
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future
    Why would that be?

    Massive operational costs to process all the complaints irrespective if they are justified or not and then large amounts of formerly booked earnings having to be refunded leaves a big black hole in the accounts for the next few years. You either issue your shareholders with a profit warning or you increase your revenues to make up for the costs. Most companies are likely to do the later. 

    Hence those that take out future credit agreements are likely to pay slightly more to cover these costs
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,430 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    prowla said:
    Nasqueron said:
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future
    Why would that be?

    Car companies will want to make back any money lost out on these grifting exercises (even the admin charges for dealing with people who had no DCA, or had 0% finance etc add up). You don't think the car firms will just suck up the cost of any refunds for a practice that, while undoubtedly shady, wasn't banned at the time? It's the same as PPI, sites like this and the CMC leeches encouraged everyone and their wife to chuck in nonsense PPI complaints which companies ended up paying as it was cheaper than fighting them all, even those without merit. They make the money back by reducing benefits or increasing costs to the rest of us.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Hoenir
    Hoenir Posts: 6,583 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Add Airline compensation to the list of additional costs will be borne by the consumers using the service. 
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 17,192 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hoenir said:
    Add Airline compensation to the list of additional costs will be borne by the consumers using the service. 
    All costs of doing business are ultimately borne by the customers, voluntary and not.... uninsured drivers, shoplifters, taxes, the list is nearly endless. 
  • Hoenir
    Hoenir Posts: 6,583 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hoenir said:
    Add Airline compensation to the list of additional costs will be borne by the consumers using the service. 
    All costs of doing business are ultimately borne by the customers, voluntary and not.... uninsured drivers, shoplifters, taxes, the list is nearly endless. 
    I was merely musing about areas where the culture is increasingly for inconvenience compensation. Rather than costs that have always been costed into product and service pricing. 
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 13,832 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    prowla said:
    Nasqueron said:
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future
    Why would that be?
    Specifically if the new car is bought on finance. The finance companies as part of their business model will need to increase their revenue and gross profits to cover the additional cost of payouts, which will mean higher interest rates charged on new finance products. 

    Nasqueron said:
    prowla said:
    Nasqueron said:
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future
    Why would that be?

    Car companies will want to make back any money lost out on these grifting exercises (even the admin charges for dealing with people who had no DCA, or had 0% finance etc add up). You don't think the car firms will just suck up the cost of any refunds for a practice that, while undoubtedly shady, wasn't banned at the time? It's the same as PPI, sites like this and the CMC leeches encouraged everyone and their wife to chuck in nonsense PPI complaints which companies ended up paying as it was cheaper than fighting them all, even those without merit. They make the money back by reducing benefits or increasing costs to the rest of us.

    Well yes, but...
    Their prices still have to be competitive.
  • Hoenir
    Hoenir Posts: 6,583 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    prowla said:
    prowla said:
    Nasqueron said:
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future
    Why would that be?
    Specifically if the new car is bought on finance. The finance companies as part of their business model will need to increase their revenue and gross profits to cover the additional cost of payouts, which will mean higher interest rates charged on new finance products. 

    Nasqueron said:
    prowla said:
    Nasqueron said:
    Oh well, higher payments for the rest of us if we buy cars in the future
    Why would that be?

    Car companies will want to make back any money lost out on these grifting exercises (even the admin charges for dealing with people who had no DCA, or had 0% finance etc add up). You don't think the car firms will just suck up the cost of any refunds for a practice that, while undoubtedly shady, wasn't banned at the time? It's the same as PPI, sites like this and the CMC leeches encouraged everyone and their wife to chuck in nonsense PPI complaints which companies ended up paying as it was cheaper than fighting them all, even those without merit. They make the money back by reducing benefits or increasing costs to the rest of us.

    Well yes, but...
    Their prices still have to be competitive.
    Build them in China at a fraction of the labour cost of US and European plants. . 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.