We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Planning permission with multiple "red line boundary".
lemonizer
Posts: 43 Forumite
Hi all,
I'm curious. Permission was given years ago to a project local to myself and it's now been built.
A final "non-material ammendment" was put forward to clear up all the differences between as built and as approved.
The issue is the non-material ammendment changed the "red line boundry" so now there are 2x (or maybe more) versions of this planning permission boundary approved.
One version of the planning boundrary means everyting is inside the boundary while the other means development work has been completed outside of the boundary.
I thought there "could only be on" but it appears we have 2(or more).
I'm curious. Permission was given years ago to a project local to myself and it's now been built.
A final "non-material ammendment" was put forward to clear up all the differences between as built and as approved.
The issue is the non-material ammendment changed the "red line boundry" so now there are 2x (or maybe more) versions of this planning permission boundary approved.
One version of the planning boundrary means everyting is inside the boundary while the other means development work has been completed outside of the boundary.
I thought there "could only be on" but it appears we have 2(or more).
Any ideas?
0
Comments
-
Can’t see why it matters? The permitted works are whatever the application describes.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards