📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

warning - 1st Central hike price scam

Options
2»

Comments

  • Just to clarify my previous thread …
    The single page certificate in section five stated me as the only person insured on the policy to drive the vehicle.
    It has no reference to driving other vehicles.
    I think it should state a yes you are AND a no you are not statement.
    If you watch any of the police programs, drivers are regularly caught out by assuming that they are covered 3rd party to drive other vehicles.
    Again, my fault for not ascertaining my entitlement.
    By the way .. their website has very little obvious contact detail. There is no “How to contact us” tab.

    Such is life eh!
  • cw8825
    cw8825 Posts: 618 Forumite
    500 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Just to clarify my previous thread …
    The single page certificate in section five stated me as the only person insured on the policy to drive the vehicle.
    It has no reference to driving other vehicles.
    I think it should state a yes you are AND a no you are not statement.
    If you watch any of the police programs, drivers are regularly caught out by assuming that they are covered 3rd party to drive other vehicles.
    Again, my fault for not ascertaining my entitlement.
    By the way .. their website has very little obvious contact detail. There is no “How to contact us” tab.

    Such is life eh!
    It need to state yes you or or no you are not.

    if it states it then you are covered
    With Driving other cars the general assumption it is always included but it’s down to the underwriter and is not guranteed on a normal everyday policy. 

    If you wanted it Guranteed you would need to find a policy that is not aimed at the mass market

    in terms of the cancellation fee - how often do you actually need to drive somebody else’s car?

  • stew22
    stew22 Posts: 2 Newbie
    Sixth Anniversary First Post
    I have just had a similar experience from 1st Central. I gave all correct information at time of quote, pointing out I was I employment, had 10yrs no claims discount and been involved in an accident that was not my fault. Having then being asked to provide the NCD from my previous insurer I did so. I then received a call saying that they had had to make changes to my policy as I had not disclosed things at the time. They were wanting a one off payment of over £500. I pointed out that, although on garden leave from work this still legally meant i was employed at the time of taking out the policy. I disputed their claim and told them I wanted to cancel my policy. They admitted during the call that I had not been at fault and acknowledged there was a delay in their part in processing my paperwork. They wavered the early cancellation fee of £50 and administration fee of £50 but calculated I still owed about £37 (minus the direct debit that had just come out) having added on an arrangement fee of £50 and giving me seven days to pay. I have emailed them pointing out that as there should not be an arrangement fee as no changes should have to be made to the policy that in actual fact they owe me around £25. I have requested they respond and find a way to pay me. Interestingly, after I had the telephone conversation earlier and a confirmation email stating I owed around £37 I received a further email a couple of hours later as though the telephone conversation had never taken place and asking for the £500 premium.
  • blueberrypie
    blueberrypie Posts: 2,400 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    Reporting another similiar experience with 1st Central. Policy taken out a few weeks ago, main driver + 2 named drivers. One of the named drivers (call him Fred) has his own vehicle and has insurance on that vehicle. A claim was made on Fred's insurance policy about three years ago, but Joe, not Fred, was driving. Joe was at fault but Fred's no-claims discount was unaffected.

    1st Central emailed to say that the database showed an accident on xxx date involving Fred. Letters from Fred's insurer were provided, along with an explanation. One of the letters provided was addressed to Fred saying that he had no claims, another was addressed to Joe saying he had a claim on xxx date (1st Central didn't ask for this, but it seemed sensible to provided the evidence for the claim on that date).

    1st Central then emailed again to say that as Fred was involved in an accident on xxx date, there would be an additional charge of £9.99 on the policy premium, + £50 admin fee for the change.

    A phone-call to 1st Central sorted it out in our case - the very helpful person on the phone went and perused the documents we'd provided, then agreed that they'd made an error and that there would be no amendment, no extra premium and no admin fee. But it does sound like this is becoming a habit with them.


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.