We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Canon Camera refusing refund on defective goods due to lack of original packaging
Comments
-
Pragmatic but wouldn't work if the serial number is printed on the box, which it may well be!CardinalWolsey said:Could you afford to order another one, and then return the faulty one for a refund in your replacement's packaging?
Also technically fraud (although I could't imagine any action being taken)!1 -
Okell said:@jim30 - assuming the lens actually is faulty then within the first 30 days* after purchase you can exercise your short-term right to reject the faulty lens for a full refund. It is not necessary to have the original packaging**.
The law is in s20(1) and s22 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (legislation.gov.uk)
* The 30 day period is "paused" if you agree to a repair or replacement and only starts again once you get the repair or replacement back.
** Do Canon fully understand that you are exercising your rights under the above legislation and that you are not trying to use their own returns policy which probably requires the original packaging? You need to make it clear you are asserting your statutory rights under the above legislation.
I've repeatedly said to them that I'm trying to use the legislation - banging my head on a brick wall at the moment!0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Chargeback would fail because OP has not returned the goods.powerful_Rogue said:How id did you pay? Presuming debit card or credit card as an online purchase. Should look at chargeback/s75 if they are refusing to fulfil their legal obligations.0 -
Alderbank said:
Chargeback would fail because OP has not returned the goods.powerful_Rogue said:How id did you pay? Presuming debit card or credit card as an online purchase. Should look at chargeback/s75 if they are refusing to fulfil their legal obligations.
So chargeback, and offer to return the goods to the seller if they want them.
If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.1 -
Needs to be the other way round generally... return the goods and then do the chargeback with your evidence that they've got the goods back.Ectophile said:Alderbank said:
Chargeback would fail because OP has not returned the goods.powerful_Rogue said:How id did you pay? Presuming debit card or credit card as an online purchase. Should look at chargeback/s75 if they are refusing to fulfil their legal obligations.
So chargeback, and offer to return the goods to the seller if they want them.0 -
OP is there is not away to raise a return on the website or any kind of return label sent out inside the parcel?In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0
-
I've gone through the process of returning an unopened lens extender to Canon and even that was a faff. It involved sending an email to them, them calling me four days later going over some more details and asking me to send a whole load of photos of all sides of the product box and the original shipping label (they've have wanted photos of the item too if I'd opened it) and them then replying with a returns label and saying a collection had been arranged for the next working day.I understand that they sell some expensive items, and it did all work out for me, but it was a bit much.0
-
Which you have a legal right to do, as the lens is faulty, and I'm sure if you battle away long enough you will get a refund.jim30 said:Okell said:@jim30 - assuming the lens actually is faulty then within the first 30 days* after purchase you can exercise your short-term right to reject the faulty lens for a full refund. It is not necessary to have the original packaging**.
The law is in s20(1) and s22 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (legislation.gov.uk)
* The 30 day period is "paused" if you agree to a repair or replacement and only starts again once you get the repair or replacement back.
** Do Canon fully understand that you are exercising your rights under the above legislation and that you are not trying to use their own returns policy which probably requires the original packaging? You need to make it clear you are asserting your statutory rights under the above legislation.
I've repeatedly said to them that I'm trying to use the legislation - banging my head on a brick wall at the moment!
Yes, you should't have to, but had you kept the packaging and gone through Canon's prescribed procedure it would probably have been a whole lot easier.
Maybe a real world lesson for a easy life.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
