PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Restriction preventing refinance.

In 2011 I bought a property which was an estate repossession, I took out a mortgage with the mortgage works.

The following restrictions were put on the title documents.

#3 (12.12.2011) RESTRICTION: Until 23 March 2012 no disposition of the
registered estate (other than a charge) by the proprietor of the
registered estate is to be registered without a certificate signed by
Southern Pacific Mortgage Limited (Co. Regn No. 3266119) of St Johns
Place, Easton Street, High Wycombe HP11 1NL that the provisions of
clause 12.1 of the Transfer dated 23 November 2011 and made between (1)
Southern Pacific Mortages Limited and (2) Myself **** and My-Wife ******* have been complied with.

#4 (12.12.2011) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the registered estate by
the proprietor of the registered estate is to be registered without a
written consent signed by the proprietor for the time being of the
Charge dated 23 November 2011 in favour of The Mortgage Works (UK) PLC
referred to in the Charges Register.

I paid off the mortgage a few years later and restriction #4 and the associated charge were both removed.

I don't understand why I have restriction #3, I've never heard of Southern Pacific Mortgage Limited, this restriction is still on the title and my conveyance solicitor is holding up the refinance of the property due to this.

This company doesn't seem to exist anymore, I don't know what to do.
«1

Comments

  • Rodders53
    Rodders53 Posts: 2,589 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    This company doesn't seem to exist anymore, I don't know what to do.
    Companies House seems to think differently...

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03266119

    Your conveyancing firm are useless if they cannot find that information as easily as I can... from the Company number in the restriction.

    Which seems to be 'timed out' ("Until 23 March 2012") so no longer applies anyway?


  • If you look through the company accounts it only exists as a zombie company, owned by another company that is in administration.
  • GrumpyDil
    GrumpyDil Posts: 1,982 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    But the main point is to ask your conveyancer why he thinks it is outstanding considering it says Until 23 March 2012 so appears to have expired. 
  • penners324
    penners324 Posts: 3,464 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Southern Pacific were a sub prime mortgage lender.

    Thought they'd gone bust years ago.
  • propertyrental
    propertyrental Posts: 3,391 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper


    #3 (12.12.2011) RESTRICTION: Until 23 March 2012 no disposition of the
    registered estate (other than a charge) by the proprietor of the
    registered estate is to be registered without a certificate signed by
    Southern Pacific Mortgage Limited (Co. Regn No. 3266119) of St Johns
    Place, Easton Street, High Wycombe HP11 1NL that the provisions of
    clause 12.1 of the Transfer dated 23 November 2011 and made between (1)
    Southern Pacific Mortages Limited and (2) Myself **** and My-Wife ******* have been complied with.



    Don't 'do' anything. I don't understand the problem?
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    It looks like Mortgage Works arranged some finance through Southern Pacific Mortgages.

    What does clause 12.1 say?

     that the provisions of
    clause 12.1 of the Transfer dated 23 November 2011 and made between (1)
    Southern Pacific Mortages Limited and (2) Myself **** and My-Wife ******* have been complied with.
  • sheramber said:
    It looks like Mortgage Works arranged some finance through Southern Pacific Mortgages.

    What does clause 12.1 say?

     that the provisions of
    clause 12.1 of the Transfer dated 23 November 2011 and made between (1)
    Southern Pacific Mortages Limited and (2) Myself **** and My-Wife ******* have been complied with.


    I don't know, this is the first I have heard of them, I don't remember signing anything and don't have any paperwork as I paid this off in 2018.

     penners324 said:
    Southern Pacific were a sub prime mortgage lender.

    Thought they'd gone bust years ago.
    I'm pretty sure they stopped selling mortgages in 2008.

    I wondered if this was anything to do with the previous owner of the property, she had a sub prime mortgage and was in negative equity when she died, we bought it as a repossession from the estate.


  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    But your link shows you and your wife's names on the restriction.

    Southern Pacific Mortgages are now operated by by Acenden.  Maybe they can provide some information about the restriction.
  • propertyrental
    propertyrental Posts: 3,391 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    RESTRICTION: Until 23 March 2012

    I still don't understand the problem. Can someone explain?
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,310 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    I think we've heard about this sort of restriction before in repossessions, and it's designed to stop the lender being embarrassed (and face a claim by their borrower) by the buyer immediately flipping the property. So the buyer can't sell for a certain period after completion.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.